home › Miscellaneous › Life principles ideals morality famusova. The moral character and life ideals of the Famus society

Life principles ideals morality famusova. The moral character and life ideals of the Famus society

Ideals and views of Chatsky (Griboyedov)

The action of A. S. Griboyedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit” takes place in those years when the split in the noble environment is becoming more and more obvious. It was the beginning of the 20s of the XIX century.

The influence of the ideas of the French enlighteners, the growth of Russian national identity after the war of 1812 and foreign campaigns united many young noblemen in an effort to change society.

But most of the Russian nobility remained deaf or hostile to the new trends. It is this situation, this conflict that Griboyedov captured in his work.

note

The main conflict of comedy is the conflict of two worldviews, the clash of the "current century" with the "past century".

There is also a second conflict in the comedy - a love one (there is even a classic love triangle: Chatsky - Sofya - Molcha-lin), but it is not the main one, although both conflicts are closely intertwined and complement each other, both of them find their resolution at the end of the play.

The bearer of new, progressive ideas is Alexander Chatsky, his ideological opponent in comedy is the entire Famus society. Why was their clash inevitable? Because Ideals and views of Chatsky did not and could not coincide with the views and ideals of Famusov.

First of all, they have different views on the service. If for Famusov service is only a source of rank, wealth, then for Chatsky it is the civic duty of every young nobleman. Chatsky is ready to serve, but “to the cause, not to individuals,” to the Fatherland, and not to a higher official.

He tried to serve, he even knew the ministers, but then he retired and broke off his former acquaintances, as he was convinced that it was impossible at that time to serve honestly without being served. Chatsky responds to Famusov’s advice to “go serve”: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve.”

In the monologue “And sure enough, the world began to grow stupid,” he speaks indignantly about those officials who “not in war, but in peace, took their foreheads, knocked on the floor without sparing!”. Chatsky calls the past century very precisely: "The century of humility and fear was direct."

But for Famusov it was a "golden" age; not without reason he sets as an example Chatsky his uncle Maxim Petrovich, who, having stumbled at the reception, managed to make the queen laugh and achieve her favor.

For Skalozub and Molchalin, a career is the main thing in life, and they are ready to achieve ranks by any means, even humiliation and flattery. Skalozub's dream is "I just want to be a general."

Alexander Andreevich appears in comedy as a fierce opponent of serfdom. And this is understandable: he expresses the views on the social structure of Russia not only of the author himself, but also of many of his Decembrist friends, who believed that an educated, enlightened person should not own other people.

Chatsky speaks with anger about a certain feudal lord, “Nestor of noble scoundrels,” who exchanged faithful servants who more than once saved his life and honor “in hours of wine and fights” for “three greyhounds”.

Chatsky in the monologue "And who are the judges?" denounces those “homelands of the fathers” who, “are rich in robbery”, “found protection from court in friends, in kinship, magnificent building chambers, where they overflow in feasts and extravagance”, denounces “the meanest traits of the past life”. Myself
Chatsky treats the people with great respect, he calls them "our smart, cheerful people."

It is impossible to imagine Chatsky in the role of a serf-owner; it is not for nothing that Famusov advises him not to manage the "estate by mistake". Chatsky values a person by his intelligence, education, and not by the number of serf souls or rank. Therefore, for him, a certain Foma Fomich, a well-known and important official, is just "the most empty person, from the most stupid."

Chatsky stands up for the freedom of the individual, for the right of a person to decide his own destiny: to serve or not to serve, to engage in science or art, to live in a village or in a city. Chatsky is a supporter of enlightenment, education, and all these Chatsky's views cause horror of rejection among his ideological opponents.

Ideals and views of Chatsky- This Ideals and views true patriot; he speaks sarcastically about a certain Frenchman from Bordeaux, who, at an evening in Famusov’s house, told the assembled guests “how he equipped himself for the journey, to Russia, to the barbarians, with fear and tears,” but when he arrived, “he found that there was no end to caresses, no did not meet the sound of a Russian, nor a Russian face ... ". This Frenchman felt like a "little king", and Chatsky yearns with all his heart,

So that the Lord destroyed this unclean spirit
Empty, slavish, blind imitation...

In the comedy, Chatsky is tragically alone, he has no supporters among the main characters, but there are two off-stage characters that we can attribute to the protagonist's supporters.

First of all, Skalozub’s cousin, who unexpectedly retired and “began reading books in the village,” and the nephew of Princess Tugoukhovskaya, about whom she says indignantly: “Chinov doesn’t want to know! He is a chemist, he is a botanist, Prince Fyodor, my nephew.”

In a clash with the Famus society, Chatsky is defeated. This defeat was inevitable, since there were still too few Chatskys in society. As I. A. Goncharov wrote in the critical study “A Million of Torments”: “Chatsky is broken by the amount of old strength, inflicting a mortal blow on it with the quality of fresh strength.”

But such as Chatsky, Goncharov called "advanced warriors, skirmishers", who are the first to enter the battle and almost always die.

But thoughts, ideas, Ideals and views of Chatsky were not in vain, such Chatskys will come to the Senate Square on December 14, 1825, where they will clash with the world of the Famusovs, silent-lings and pufferfish.

Griboyedov, Woe from Wit. What are the moral and life ideals of the Famus society?

Woe from Wit is Griboyedov's famous work, which depicts the life of the country after the Patriotic War of 1812. This is a life where two camps collided.

The first camp is an advanced, Decembrist view, a new view of life, of its foundations. The second camp is the nobility, or the past century, they are also Famus society.

We will talk about the ideals of the Famus society in the essay, considering both their moral and life ideals.

To understand what are the ideals in the Famus society, to highlight their ideals and values, it is enough to get acquainted with the work of Griboyedov. In it, the author, depicting the past century, creates images of the noble nobles of Moscow, who call themselves aces, they are also representatives of the Famus society.

Life ideals of the Famus society

Who is a person from this circle and what are their life ideals? Here we see only the rich, noble nobles, so to speak, the beau monde of the capital. All of them come from noble families, and the ideals of these people are simple and understandable.

Famusov, talking about the ideals of a person, says so, be inferior, but if there are souls of two thousand family members, he is the groom. So, Skalozub was a good candidate for suitors, because he was aiming for generals, besides, he also had a bag of gold.

note

But if there is no money, if a person is poor, then the Famus society will treat him with contempt. You can’t even talk about serfs at all, because they are generally not considered people, calling them blockheads and crowbars. Again, in order for the beau monde to respect, wealth is needed.

For example, Tatyana Yuryevna is respected, because she suits rich balls.

Moral ideals of the Famus society

He simply sacrificed the back of his head, his neck simply often bent in bows. What is most terrible, many representatives of this environment also receive honor and wealth in the same way. The same Skolozub is no better.

According to his story, in 1813 he simply sat in hiding, and after such an outstanding feat he received a medal, now he is waiting for the rank of general.

The ideal of the Famus society is definitely not enlightenment, because enlightenment and learning are like a plague for them. People who are engaged in science and creativity are useless people for society. Famusov believes that education only harms, so he would simply burn all the books. And they don't even read newspapers.

Famusov's entourage is also false patriots. They only talk about patriotism, but they themselves do nothing for the country. Although there are ranks, they are not deserved in the performance of military or civic duty. Foreign words are constantly heard in their conversation, they listen to French romances, they follow the French fashion.

So what characterizes Famus society? And here we can summarize. Famus society is characterized by fear of the new, fear of progress, and the ideal is ignorance and conservatism. So they live according to the principle: take rewards and live happily.

Chatsky's ideals (based on the comedy "Woe from Wit")

Works › Griboyedov A.S. › Woe from Wit

Ready Homework

In my comedy, there are 25 fools to one sane person. And this man, of course, in contradiction with the society around him, no one understands, no one wants to forgive, why he is a little higher than others.

A. S. Griboyedov

A.S. Griboedov brought to the stage two opposing camps, the camp of young Russia and the camp of the serf-owners. Their struggle was a phenomenon of Russian life in the tenth and twenties of the XIX century.

At this time, revolutionary nobles stood out from the general mass of the nobility - supporters of the fight against everything obsolete in the social and political system, supporters of the fight for the new for the country's movement forward.

Life ideals of the Famus society

A. S. Griboyedov wrote his famous comedy “Woe from Wit” in the first half of the 19th century, in the midst of preparations for the December uprising. Revolutionary moods already prevailed in society. It seemed to be invisibly divided into the nobility that had developed by that time and new people who carried advanced ideas to the masses. Griboyedov himself belonged to the second camp, so A. A. Chatsky became the main character of the work.

And he condemns the established worldview of wealthy officials.

One of these Moscow landowners was Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov, in whose house the entire beau monde of the city gathered. Thanks to this hero, for more than two centuries there has been an expression “famus society”. Who are the people from Famusov's circle? All of them, without exception, come from noble families, and therefore, people who are poorer are treated with contempt.

They have a very prejudiced attitude towards serfs. For them, they are “parsley”, “chumps”, “crowbars”, etc. Famusov himself, turning to his workers, says: “Get you to work! Settle you!”

These so-called Moscow nobles boast of their patriotism, while doing nothing for the sake of the country. Even their ranks they deserved not brave military duty. They distort Russian names in the French manner, wear dresses modeled on foreign fashionistas, read French books, sing French romances.

This is what Chatsky condemns in them, who is unpleasant to see such false patriotism in his environment. The life ideals of the Famus society can also include indifference to service and a negative attitude towards teaching. For them, people engaged in science or creativity are useless subjects for society.

As Famusov says in relation to Chatsky's "madness": "Learning is the plague, learning is the reason that today, more than ever, there are crazy divorced people, deeds, and opinions." And everyone readily agrees with him.

To be precise, the “past” century in Griboyedov’s work is represented by the Tugoukhovsky, Gorich, Khryumin families, the elderly Madame Khlestova, Skalozub, Zagoretsky and Repetilov. The Tugoukhovskys come to the Famusovs' ball to find “worthy” husbands for their daughters. Gorichi are old friends of Chatsky, but he perceives this couple with slight irony, because Natalya Dmitrievna skillfully subjugated her husband and made him a weak-willed person.

Countess Hryumina: grandmother and granddaughter. Chatsky especially dislikes the latter for her caustic manner of remarks and imitation of French milliners. Madame Khlestova is a domineering and capricious old woman who took with her a dog and a girl-arapka.

A special place in comedy is occupied by Skalozub, Repetilov and Zagoretsky. The first was chosen by Famusov as a husband for his daughter Sophia, since he is rude, uneducated, uncouth, but he has a good financial condition and occupies an “important” post. Zagoretsky is a former gambler, swindler and thief, and Repetilov is a thoughtless talker who, however, was lucky to marry the daughter of a wealthy official. With the tacit consent of these heroes, the fate of other people is decided in a comedy.

Thus, all representatives of the Famus society are united by a common ideals, which include inertia, lack of education, fear of progress, fear of everything that is new.

(No Ratings Yet)

How does Molchalin reveal himself during a dialogue with Chatsky? How does he behave and what gives him the right to behave this way? Molchalin is cynical and frank with Chatsky about his life views. He talks, from his point of view, with a loser (“You didn’t get a rank, did you fail at work?”), Gives advice to go to Tatyana Yuryevna, is sincerely surprised by the sharp [...] ...
Mind in the understanding of Chatsky and Famus society In the work of AS Griboyedov “Woe from Wit”, the central place is occupied by the problem of the mind or what different people, representatives of two polar communities, mean by it. The writer himself calls sane in his work only the main character A. A. Chatsky - a young nobleman, not rich, but with progressive views and a high […]...
New trends came to Russia after the victory in the war of 1812. As always with the introduction of a new ideology, there was a polarization of high society, and the government consolidated conservative forces around itself, which were called upon to fight freethinking. It was this society, which did not want and actively resisted changes, that became the prototype of the Famus society for A. S. Griboyedov when creating [...] ...
In the comedy Woe from Wit, Griboedov portrayed the life of Russia after the Patriotic War of 1812. Close in his views to the Decembrists, Griboedov showed the clash of two camps in Russian public life: the advanced Decembrist and the old serfdom, the “current century” and the “past century”. Depicting the "past century", Griboyedov brought to the stage a whole crowd of inhabitants of noble Moscow. These are the rich and noble […]
Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" was created in 1822-1824. It reflected the contemporary position of the author in society. Through everyday plot, Griboyedov showed not only the moral state of the Russian nobility. He painted a portrait of the socio-political life of the country, split into two camps: conservatives and people with progressive views. “Woe from Wit”, in fact, is the first Russian realistic work. […]...
The comedy “Woe from Wit” gives a general picture of the entire Russian life of the 10-20s of the 19th century, reproduces the eternal struggle between the old and the new, which unfolded with great force at that time not only in Moscow, but throughout Russia, between the two camps : advanced, Decembrist-minded people and feudal lords, a stronghold of antiquity. To the Famus Society, which firmly preserved the traditions of the “past century”, [...] ...
Hello dear listeners! The program “Theater and Life” is on the air, and the director of the theater named after A. Vakhtangov Evgeny Arbenin. We meet with him in connection with a significant event - the other day the premiere of the play "Woe from Wit" took place. Evgeny Vasilyevich - director. - Tell me, please, why Griboedov's work? - Good afternoon, dear […]
1. The history of the comedy "Woe from Wit". 2. The reason for the disagreement between the representatives of the “present century” and the “past century”. 3. The immortality of the comedy by A. S. Griboyedov. A. S. Griboedov created the comedy “Woe from Wit” at the beginning of the 19th century. In those years, new trends began to replace the orders of the Catherine era, other people appeared in Russian society, with advanced [...] ...
A noble husband thinks about what is due. A low person thinks about what is profitable. Confucius The comedy "Woe from Wit" was completed by A. S. Griboyedov by the autumn of 1824. The work put the writer on a par with the first poets of the country. Indeed, one cannot argue with the genius of this comedy - it fully reveals the most important problems of Russia in the 19th century. […]...
The current century and the past century The satirical comedy of Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov “Woe from Wit” was written in 1824. It was created at a time when people changed one worldview for another. The people of the “past century” continued to live according to the old established laws, while the people of the “present century” aspired to new changes. The representatives of the “past century” included Famusov and the surrounding [...] ...
Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov wrote the first realistic comedy in Russian literature. The title of each piece has a meaning. The name of the comedy "Woe from Wit" reflects the life drama of the protagonist - Alexander Andreevich Chatsky. Chatsky is a very smart and educated person, but this does not bring him happiness. He returns to his beloved girl, but she betrayed him and already [...] ...
School based on the comedy by A. S. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit”. The comedy "Woe from Wit" by Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov depicts the life of society in Russia in the first two decades of the nineteenth century. Griboyedov vividly and fully showed the struggle of the old with the new, the struggle of the new generation with the old feudal foundations of society. The main character who represents the new generation is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky, who [...] ...
Female images The satirical comedy of Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov, "Woe from Wit", was written in the first half of the nineteenth century. At this time, everyone worshiped someone else's fashion, language and culture, imitated Europe, mainly France. In society, teachings, books were rejected, a person was judged by wealth and the number of serfs. Moscow noblewomen are represented by Natalya Dmitrievna Gorich, Anfisa Nilovna Khlestova, Countess Tugoukhovskaya […]...
Is Sophia worthy of Chatsky's love? The protagonist of the comedy, Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky, is opposed to the camp of representatives of the Famus society, namely, the society of people of the “past” century. Without fear and regret, he alone goes against the Moscow bureaucratic families, openly mocking [...] ...
And who are the judges? After the Patriotic War of 1812, a period of gloomy government reaction began in Russia. Society split into representatives of the "past" century and into people with new aspirations for the future. The first include the so-called “Famus society” from Griboyedov’s work “Woe from Wit”, and the second Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky, an intelligent man who managed to oppose [...] ...
The problem of the mind in comedy About his work "Woe from Wit" A. S. Griboyedov wrote: "In my comedy there are 25 fools per sane person." This expression alone characterizes the meaning of the book. We understand that we are talking about the eternal problem of the mind and stupidity. It was cutting-edge comedy for its time, propagating a new movement. The protagonist in his [...]
The conflict of two eras Reading the comedy of A. S. Griboyedov, we become witnesses of the collision of two eras, which actually took place in Russia at the beginning of the 19th century. It is a conflict between "the present age" and "the past age". It cannot be said that this topic has lost its relevance. After all, the conflict of generations has always been and will always be. However, Griboyedov showed it from the point of view of the advanced [...] ...
In the comedy "Woe from Wit" by A. S. Griboedov, a magnificent generalized image of the lordly Moscow of the early 19th century was created. From the first pages, the author introduces us to the life of a noble family, introduces us to the mores of a noble society, and reveals the relationship between the characters. The first scenes in Famusov's house introduce us to some characters (Famusov, Sofya, Molchalin, Lisa) and prepare for the appearance of others (Skalozub, […]...
For what and against what Chatsky fights The comedy “Woe from Wit” Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov wrote after the Patriotic War of 1812 and shortly before the December uprising in the country. Thus, the work fully conveys the mood that was in the air at that time. The society actually split into two opposition camps. The first included people of the "past century" - [...] ...
Funny or terrible Molchalin The appearance at the beginning of the 19th century of Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" opened a new milestone in the history of Russian literature. All the characters created by the writer have not only literary, but also social significance. The heroes of the comedy are divided into two camps: “the past century” and “the present century”, but there are those who have nowhere to put them. For example, Molchalin Alexey Stepanych, [...] ...
Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov is one of the main characters in A. S. Griboedov’s comedy “Woe from Wit”. Famusov is a Moscow gentleman, Sophia's father and an old friend of Chatsky's father. It is in his house that the events of the play unfold. Pavel Afanasyevich is a widower, he loves his daughter very much, takes care of her upbringing and looks for a worthy groom for Sophia. At […]...
Does a book help a person to better understand himself "Reading is the best teaching" - said Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin. Literature helps a person to learn something new, interesting, broaden his horizons, solve some of his problems, and most importantly, to know himself. Books that have come down to us from ancient times are a reflection of the entire life experience of past generations. Many of them […]...
What is Sophia's fault and misfortune In the comedy by A. S. Griboedov, new Moscow nobles of the 19th century are presented, for whom only a high position in society and the presence of significant ranks have a price. The author skillfully shows the conflict between the landowners-serfs and the young, positive-thinking generation. This is a clash of two camps: the “past” century and the “present” century. Protecting your mercantile interests and personal [...] ...
Letter to Sofya Dear Sofya Pavlovna, I am writing this letter in response to your previous letters with a story about the current situation in your house. I thought for a long time how to help you and what to advise. Alas, it seems to me that the person you are now in love with is not worthy of you and pursues only his own goals, although I may be wrong. I know, […]...
One of the main characters of Griboyedov's great creation "Woe from Wit" is Famusov. This is a very bright and memorable hero, so I can not describe his image and character. Full name - Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov. This is a very rich man who is a manager in a state institution. He always enjoys his high position both in society and [...] ...
Chatsky and the Famus Society In the satirical comedy by Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov, a noble society of the 10-20s of the 19th century is described. The protagonist of the work, Alexander Andreevich Chatsky, is a young, noble, honest and free-thinking person. In comedy, he is opposed not only to individual characters, but to the entire Famus society, which lived according to the traditions of the “past century”. Famusov, in whose house the events unfolded, [...] ...
There are several conflicts in the play “Woe from Wit”, while the presence of only one conflict was a necessary condition for the classic play. “Woe from Wit” is a comedy with two storylines, and at first glance it seems that there are two conflicts in the play: love (between Chatsky and Sophia) and public (between Chatsky and Famusovsky society). The play begins with the beginning of a love conflict [...] ...
The whole action of the drama takes place in Moscow in Famusov's house, where our character actually lives. The author does not give a full description of his appearance, but from small phrases we can understand that Famusov is an elderly man, obese, loud-voiced, with hair gray as ashes “... Look at me: I don’t brag about my constitution, but I’m cheerful and fresh, and lived to […]...
Chatsky Alexander Andreevich is the main character in Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit". Returning to his homeland, to Famusov's house, where he once met his first love, he hopefully tries to return the feelings of Sophia, who by that time no longer loved him. Encountering lies, deceit, hypocrisy, lack of education on his way, he furiously begins to express his opinion about [...] ...
1. The Moscow "light" values its nobility, reliably guards feudal ideals. Griboyedov emphasizes the cruelty of the landowners towards the serfs. "Aliens" - Molchalin, Zagoretsky - must be hypocritical, please, pretend. 2. Representatives of Famusovskaya Moscow treat the service as a means of “getting rank”, “taking awards and having fun”. 3. The main human value in the Moscow world is the “golden bag”, and [...] ...
The main characters of the comedy "Woe from Wit" are Chatsky and Famusov. A. S. Griboyedov shows the clash of the mind of Chatsky and the stupidity of the Famus society. Famus society is characterized by deceit, stupidity, ignorance and unwillingness to overcome its shortcomings. This is proved by many episodes of comedy. The main ideologue Famusov says: Tell me that it’s not good for her eyes to spoil And it’s not great for reading: She [...] ...
The heroine of Griboedov's play "Woe from Wit" Sophia is presented in the work rather ambiguously. Her image is indeed contradictory. What is this contradiction? On the one hand, she was greatly influenced by the environment in which her ideals were formed. She was brought up by the Famus Society and in many ways learned the rules of life and behavior of this world. One of these ideals is “a husband-boy, [...] ...
The main theme of the play "Woe from Wit" is the conflict of a strong personality with the philistine views of the surrounding society. This is most clearly shown in the example of the Famusov's house. Chatsky came to the silence of this house with his stormy and sincere feelings. He turned out to be an uninvited guest in a society where everything is built on pretense and lies. Sophia hides her love for Molchalin, father [...] ...
In what ways do the views on life of Chatsky and the “famus society” differ? Describe the social and moral ideals of various heroes. The blatant immorality of the opportunistic bureaucrat Molchalin, the lack of spirituality of the "silovik" Skalozub - all this is the Russian reality, which the official, military man and thinker Griboyedov knew from the inside. He also knew the “imported” romantic ideas that Chatsky, who returned from abroad, is full of. The writer pays tribute to them, shows […]
In his monologue, Chatsky touches on many issues of society in the 19th century. At the beginning of the monologue, Chatsky speaks of old judgments, that the worldview of people has not yet changed "since the time of the Ochakovskys and the conquest of the Crimea." Further, he points to the wrong moral values of the “famus society”, saying that the rich get their wealth by stealing and shutting up all those […]...
AS Griboyedov does not accidentally choose Famusov's last name. In Latin, “fama” sounds like “rumor”, and “famosus” in Latin means “famous”. Knowing this, every reader understands from the first lines of the work that we are talking about an important person occupying a high position in society. A titled landowner, a wealthy gentleman, related to the eminent nobleman Maxim Petrovich, Pavel [...] ...
The characters of Chatsky and Molchalin are opposed to each other. Chatsky is undoubtedly the main character of the comedy, because it is with his appearance that events begin to unfold in Famusov's house. Chatsky is not a rich person by origin, but this is not the main thing for him. Others speak well of him: “Who is so sensitive and cheerful and sharp…”. He used to serve as an official, but left the service, [...] ...
Chatsky comes to Moscow, hoping for great changes that have taken place in society, and the remaining Sophia. But it turns out to be in a completely different situation. Sofya turned everything past into laughter, but in the city everything remained unchanged. Chatsky does not immediately notice the change that has occurred with Sophia. For her sake, after so many years, he came to Moscow, which never tempted him, [...] ...
The comedy “Woe from Wit” by Griboedov initially carried a frivolous, comedic character. But at the end of the work it becomes clear that it is dramatic and carries a deep meaning. The expression “woe from the mind” sounds somewhat paradoxical, because what kind of grief can there be from the fact that a person is smart and educated? But it turns out that it can! And Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov is excellent [...] ...
Griboyedov wrote his comedy for several years. The author tirelessly monitored the trends in the development of society and its aspirations. The result of these observations was the writing of a brilliant work "Woe from Wit", reflecting the interaction and contradiction of representatives of such worlds as minions of feudalism and progressive nobility. The defenders of serfdom are not able to come to terms with the fact that the time of slavery has sunk [...] ...

Composition on the topic: Life ideals of the Famus society in the comedy Woe from Wit Griboyedov

How does Molchalin reveal himself during a dialogue with Chatsky? How does he behave and what gives him the right to behave this way?

Molchalin is cynical and frank with Chatsky about his life views. He talks, from his point of view, with a loser (“You weren’t given ranks, were you unsuccessful in your service?”), Gives advice to go to Tatyana Yuryevna, is sincerely surprised by Chatsky’s harsh reviews about her and Foma Fomich, who “under three ministers was the head of the department ". His condescending, even instructive tone, as well as the story of his father's will, are explained by the fact that he does not depend on Chatsky, that Chatsky, with all his talents, does not enjoy the support of the Famus society, because their views differ sharply. And, of course, a considerable right to behave this way in a conversation with Chatsky gives Molchalin his success with Sophia. The principles of Molchalin's life may seem only ridiculous ("to please all people without exception", to have two talents - "moderation and accuracy", "after all, one must depend on others"), but the well-known dilemma "Is Molchalin ridiculous or terrible?" in this scene it is decided - scary. Molchalin spoke and expressed his views.

What are the moral and life ideals of the Famus society?

Analyzing the monologues and dialogues of the characters in the second act, we have already touched on the ideals of the Famus society. Some principles are expressed aphoristically: “And to take awards, and have fun”, “If only I got to be a general!”. The ideals of Famusov's guests are expressed in scenes of their arrival at the ball. Here Princess Khlestova, knowing well the price of Zagoretsky (“He is a liar, a gambler, a thief / I was from him and the door was locked ...”), accepts him, because he is a “master of pleasing”, got her a black-haired girl as a gift. Wives subjugate their husbands to their will (Natalya Dmitrievna, a young lady), the husband-boy, the husband-servant becomes the ideal of society, therefore, Molchalin also has good prospects for entering this category of husbands and making a career. All of them seek kinship with the rich and noble. Human qualities are not valued in this society. The true evil of noble Moscow was gallomania.

Why did gossip about Chatsky's madness arise and spread? Why are Famusov's guests so willing to support this gossip?

The emergence and spread of gossip about Chatsky's madness is a series of phenomena that is very interesting from a dramatic point of view. Gossip appears at first glance by accident. G.N., catching Sophia's mood, asks her how she found Chatsky. "He has a screw loose". What did Sophia mean, being under the impression of the conversation with the hero that had just ended? It is unlikely that she put a direct meaning into her words. But the interlocutor understood exactly that and asked again. And here in the head of Sophia, insulted for Molchalin, an insidious plan arises. Of great importance for explaining this scene are the remarks to Sophia's further remarks: "after a pause, she looks at him intently, to the side." Her further remarks are already aimed at the conscious introduction of this idea into the head of secular gossips. She no longer doubts that the rumor spread will be picked up and overgrown with details.

He is ready to believe!

Ah, Chatsky! you love to dress up everyone in jesters,

Would you like to try on yourself?

Rumors of madness are spreading with astonishing speed. A series of “little comedies” begins, when everyone puts their own meaning into this news, tries to give their own explanation. Someone speaks with hostility about Chatsky, someone sympathizes with him, but everyone believes, because his behavior and his views are inadequate to the norms accepted in this society. In these comedy scenes, the characters of the characters that make up the Famus circle are brilliantly revealed. Zagoretsky supplements the news on the go with an invented lie that his rogue uncle put Chatsky in the yellow house. The countess-granddaughter also believes, Chatsky's judgments seemed insane to her. Ridiculous is the dialogue about Chatsky, the Countess-grandmother and Prince Tugoukhovsky, who, due to their deafness, add a lot to the rumor launched by Sophia: “the accursed Voltairian”, “crossed the law”, “he is in pusurmans”, etc. Then the comic miniatures are replaced by a mass scene (act three, phenomenon XXI), where almost everyone recognizes Chatsky as a madman.

Explain the meaning and determine the meaning of Chatsky's monologue about the Frenchman from Bordeaux.

The monologue "The Frenchman from Bordeaux" is an important scene in the development of the conflict between Chatsky and Famusovsky society. After the hero had conversations separately with Molchalin, Sofya, Famusov, his guests, in which a sharp opposition of views was revealed, here he delivers a monologue to the whole society gathered at the ball in the hall. Everyone has already believed in the rumor about his madness and therefore they expect obviously delusional speeches and strange, perhaps aggressive, actions from him. It is in this vein that the guests perceive Chatsky's speeches condemning the cosmopolitanism of the noble society. It is paradoxical that the hero expresses sound, patriotic thoughts (“slavish blind imitation”, “our smart, cheerful people”; by the way, the condemnation of gallomania sometimes sounds in Famusov’s speeches), they take him for a madman and leave him, stop listening, diligently spin in a waltz , the old people disperse on the card tables.

Which depicts the life of the country after the Patriotic War of 1812. This is a life where two camps collided. The first camp is an advanced, Decembrist view, a new view of life, of its foundations. The second camp is the nobility, or the past century, they are also Famus society. It is precisely about the ideals of the Famus society that we will talk in, having considered both their moral and life ideals.

Life ideals of the Famus society

For these people, only money is important, with the help of which both ranks and orders can be obtained. These are people who are not famous for their services to the Fatherland, for them civic duty means nothing, the main thing is that the groom has a thicker wallet and then he will be a respected person. Famusov, talking about the ideals of a person, says so, be inferior, but if there are souls of two thousand family members, he is the groom. So, Skalozub was a good candidate for suitors, because he was aiming for generals, besides, he also had a bag of gold. But if there is no money, if a person is poor, then the Famus society will treat him with contempt. You can’t even talk about serfs at all, because they are generally not considered people, calling them blockheads and crowbars. Again, in order for the beau monde to respect, wealth is needed. For example, Tatyana Yuryevna is respected, because she suits rich balls.

Moral ideals of the Famus society

If we talk about moral ideals and views in Famusov's society, then here for Famusov his uncle is the ideal, whom he sets as an example to everyone. His uncle served under Catherine, but he did not get his place at court with the help of any talents or merit. He simply sacrificed the back of his head, his neck simply often bent in bows. What is most terrible, many representatives of this environment also receive honor and wealth in the same way. The same Skolozub is no better. According to his story, in 1813 he simply sat in hiding, and after such an outstanding feat he received a medal, now he is waiting for the rank of general.

The ideal of the Famus society is definitely not enlightenment, because enlightenment and learning are like a plague for them. People who are engaged in science and creativity are useless people for society. Famusov believes that education only harms, so he would simply burn all the books. And they don't even read newspapers.

The comedy "Woe from Wit" reflects the brewing split in the society of the nobility. The change of one century by another, the ended war of 1812, required the landowners to reassess their values and change their outlook on social life. In this regard, there are nobles who want to improve the position of Russia by increasing the value of the human personality and civic consciousness. The struggle between the two groups of nobles is designated in the play as a clash between the "current century" and the "past century". In the comedy Woe from Wit, Chatsky and Famusov are the main opponents.

The problem of the mind in comedy

A.S. Griboyedov wrote about his work: "In my comedy there are 25 fools for one sane person." Under the "sane person" Griboyedov means the main character of the comedy - Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky. But in the process of analyzing the work, it becomes clear that Famusov cannot be called a fool either. Since Griboyedov put his own thoughts and ideals into the image of Chatsky, the author is completely on the side of the protagonist. However, both Chatsky and Famusov have their own truth, which each of the heroes defends. And each of them has his own mind, just the mind of Chatsky and the mind of Famusov differ in quality.

The mind of a nobleman who adheres to conservative views and ideals is aimed at protecting his comfort, his warm place from everything new. The new is hostile to the old way of life of the feudal landlords, because it threatens its existence. Famusov adheres to such views.

Chatsky, on the other hand, is the owner of an efficient, flexible mind, aimed at building a new world, in which the main values will be the honor and dignity of a person, his personality, and not money and position in society.

Values and ideals of Chatsky and Famusov

The views of Chatsky and Famusov sharply diverge on all issues related to the way of life of a nobleman. Chatsky is a supporter of education, enlightenment, he himself is “sharp, smart, eloquent”, “writes and translates nicely”. Famusov and his society, on the contrary, consider excessive "scholarship" harmful to society and are very afraid of the appearance in their midst of people like Chatsky. The Chatskys threaten Famusov's Moscow with the loss of her usual comfort and the opportunity to spend her life "in feasts and in extravagance."

The dispute between Chatsky and Famusov also flares up around the attitude of the nobles to the service. Chatsky "does not serve, that is, he does not find any benefit in that." The protagonist of the comedy explains it this way: "I would be glad to serve - it's sickening to serve." But the conservative noble society is arranged in such a way that without “serving” it is impossible to achieve anything here. Chatsky wants to serve “the cause, not the individuals.”

But Famusov and his supporters have a completely different view on the issue of service.

Famusov's ideal is his late uncle Maxim Petrovich. He earned the respect of the Empress herself by the fact that once at a reception he behaved like a jester. Having stumbled and fallen, he decided to turn this awkward situation in his favor: he fell a few more times on purpose to make the audience and Empress Catherine laugh. This ability to "serve" brought Maxim Petrovich great wealth and weight in society.

Chatsky does not accept such ideals, for him this is a humiliation. He calls this time the age of "submissiveness and fear", which clamps down on human freedom. The hero's comparison of the "current century" and the "past century" does not turn out in favor of the latter, because now "everyone breathes more freely and is in no hurry to fit into the regiment of jesters."

Family values of Chatsky and Famusov

The clash between Famusov and Chatsky also occurs over the divergence of their views on family values. Famusov believes that when creating a family, the presence of love is completely unimportant. “He who is poor is not a match for you,” he says to his daughter. Both in society and in the family, money is at the forefront. Wealth for the Famus society is the same as happiness. Personal qualities do not matter either in society or in the family: “Be poor, but if there are two thousand family souls, that is the groom.”

Chatsky, on the other hand, is a supporter of a living feeling, which is why he is terrible for Famus' Moscow. This hero puts love above money, education above position in society. Therefore, the conflict between Chatsky and Famusov flares up.

conclusions

A comparative description of Chatsky and Famusov reveals all the meanness and immorality of Famusov and his supporters. But Chatsky's time in the society described in the comedy "Woe from Wit" has not yet come. The protagonist is expelled from this environment, declaring him insane. Chatsky is forced to retreat due to the numerical superiority of the "past century." But he leaves Moscow not as a loser, but as a winner. Secular Moscow was frightened by his speeches. His truth is terrible for them, it threatens their personal comfort. His truth will triumph, so the replacement of the old by the new is historically natural.

The clash between Famusov and Chatsky is a dispute between two generations, two different worlds. The arguments and causes of the conflict described in this article can be used by students in grade 9 while writing an essay on the topic “Characteristics of Chatsky and Famusov in the comedy “Woe from Wit””

Artwork test

Popular in category: