Composition “Can a good person be “superfluous”? (2). The image of Oblomov as a type of “superfluous person” in Russian literature of the 19th century What is common between Oblomov and superfluous people

A miracle happened: a man was born. Who will he be? Will it benefit society? Will he be happy? So far no one knows...
A miracle happened: a man was raised from a little man. What was laid down by nature: a heart of gold, the ability to experience strong feelings, kindness, but at the same time laziness, remained. Thank you babysitters. You raised someone's sun. And now Oblomov is over 30, but he is still afraid to look at the world - because it can become painful. Ilya - Oblomov in the nominal sense of the word. What he dreamed about was not done. He is a slave of a sofa and a dressing gown. A slave to principles and habits: he is a gentleman, Zakhar is a servant ... It is then that Stolz will come and light a fire in his soul, which has died out from spiritual old age. It is then that she will burst into flames: Oblomov will fall in love with Olga. In the meantime, he has died for society, he is dying morally, and soon he will die physically ... For now, he suffers because of faith in people and nevertheless believes in them. Difficult to understand? decrypt? He does not know how to refuse the headman-manager (swindler), and lets everyone into the house indiscriminately. Trusting people you can't trust is a tragedy. You can't trust people who can stab you in the back. So why not trust them? Get over yourself? Hurt. And wrong.
But you can hit someone in the back by accident! And not to feel guilty - only the pain of the other will not decrease from this. So Oblomov suffers because of faith in people, and yet he believes in them. I am extremely sorry for this Oblomov, but there is nothing to help him until he himself makes at least some effort ... And so Oblomov was reborn. He was almost pulled out of the quagmire by love. But he was still afraid to lend a hand to happiness. Retreated without a fight. I gave it to someone. And that someone will be Stoltz. But all this - later. In the meantime, Oblomov's sun has risen over Pshenitsyna's house. That's just ... behind a blank wall, behind the black gorge of Oblomovism.
Oblomov died. The sun set, never to rise... But its rays shone in someone's memory. And some realized what they had lost. And the sun has already set. We make the same mistakes. And it always happens: during life - we take a person for granted or, even worse, we forget. And when we lose, we understand who we have lost. And we begin to appreciate. And they forget, minor flaws become insignificant. You can't bring a person back.
There were many passers-by on Oblomov's life path. Everyone got from him what he needed. You need attention, you get attention. If you want to console your pride, they will believe your boasting. But these people did not understand that it was a man-sun. And who warmed in its rays? Stolz, Olga, Zakhar, Pshenitsyna. Only four people! But at least they appreciated Oblomov? No. And that makes it even more heartbreaking. But are only four people warmed in the rays of Oblomov? We also drink from the bottomless well left to us by Goncharov. And as if we hear the laughter of the stars.
Maxlash is a unique tool! Increases by 100%

Essay on literature on the topic: Can the image of Oblomov be considered negative

Other writings:

1. Can Oblomov be considered a love story? You can evaluate the work only by looking and weighing all the actions of the protagonist in relation to the people around him. Oblomov lives under the same sky with Zakhar, his servant, with Stolz, a childhood friend, with Olga, with Read More ......
2. The concept of "tragic hero" takes us to Ancient Greece. In the tragedies of ancient Greek authors, the hero inevitably faced fate, fate, which he was unable to defeat. Despite the courageous struggle, the hero always perished. Later, in the works of the Romantics (19th century), the tragic conflict Read More ......
3. In the first third of the 19th century, a type of superfluous man took shape in Russian literature. These heroes, among which the most famous Pechorin, Onegin, Oblomov, are not like most people of their time. Superfluous people, whose mind is inquisitive and deep, “sick with the disease of the century”: for them Read More ......
4. The final work of the creative life of M. A. Bulgakov is rightfully considered the novel “The Master and Margarita”. In many ways, it can be called autobiographical - in the image of a master, the writer largely revealed himself, his literary and personal destiny. So, this is clearly seen in the line Read More ......
5. The novel by I. A. Goncharov “Oblomov” permeates the pathos of social criticism. The clash of two heroes (Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolz), two opposing lifestyles can be viewed in a broad public context. Oblomov in this regard symbolizes the inert feudal nobility, which flourished everywhere in the expanses of Read More ......
6. Among the other heroes of the play, Kuligin, a self-taught watchmaker who invents the perpetuum mobile, stands apart. He is very different from those around him. And therefore, the attitude towards him from other characters is also very special. Literally at the very beginning of the play, the reader gets the opportunity to get acquainted with the delight of Read More ......
7. In my imagination from childhood there was some kind of amazing, peculiar gallery of favorite images. At first they were heroes of fairy tales: Russian, German, French, Irish. I admired the brave Ivan Tsarevich, Aladdin, the brave and kind knight Hans from Cologne. Then the heroes of Jules Verne, Mine Reed, Cooper… Read More ......
8. First of all, I will say that Oblomov is a well-known “dead soul” to you. This type of dead soul is brought by Goncharov to a paradox, i.e. to a contradiction, when Oblomov's very existence contradicts human nature in general and what the decay will be to its logical end Read More ......

A miracle happened: a man was born. Who will he be? Will it benefit society? Will he be happy? So far no one knows...

A miracle happened: a man was raised from a little man. What was laid down by nature: a heart of gold, the ability to experience strong feelings, kindness, but at the same time laziness, remained. Thank you babysitters. You raised someone's sun. And now Oblomov is over 30, but he is still afraid to look at the world - because it can become painful. Ilya - Oblomov in the common sense of the word. What he dreamed about was not done. He is a slave of a sofa and a dressing gown. A slave to principles and habits: he is a master, Zakhar is a servant ... It will be Stolz who will come later and light a fire in his soul, which has died out from spiritual old age. It is then that she will burst into flames: Oblomov will fall in love with Olga. In the meantime, he has died for society, he is dying morally, and will soon die physically ... For now, he suffers because of faith in people and nevertheless believes in them. Difficult to understand? decrypt? He does not know how to refuse the headman-manager (swindler), and lets everyone into the house indiscriminately. Trusting people you can't trust is a tragedy. You can't trust people who can stab you in the back. So why not trust them? Get over yourself? Hurt. And wrong.

But you can hit someone in the back by accident! And do not feel guilty - only the pain of another will not decrease from this. So Oblomov suffers because of faith in people, and yet he believes in them. I am extremely sorry for this Oblomov, but there is nothing to help him until he himself makes at least some effort ... And so Oblomov was reborn. He was almost pulled out of the quagmire by love. But he was still afraid to lend a hand to happiness. Retreated without a fight. I gave it to someone. And that someone will be Stoltz. But all this - later. In the meantime, Oblomov's sun has risen over Pshenitsyna's house. That's just ... behind a blank wall, behind the black gorge of Oblomovism.

Oblomov died. The sun set, never to rise... But its rays shone in someone's memory. And some realized what they had lost. And the sun has already set. We make the same mistakes. And it always happens: during life - we take a person for granted or, even worse, we forget. And when we lose, we understand who we have lost. And we begin to appreciate. And they forget, minor flaws become insignificant. You can't bring a person back.

There were many passers-by on Oblomov's life path. Everyone got from him what he needed. You need attention, you get attention. If you want to console your pride, they will believe your boasting. But these people did not understand that it was a man-sun. And who warmed in its rays? Stolz, Olga, Zakhar, Pshenitsyna. Only four people! But at least they appreciated Oblomov? No. And that makes it even more heartbreaking. But are only four people warmed in the rays of Oblomov? We also drink from the bottomless well left to us by Goncharov. And as if we hear the laughter of the stars.

Plan.

Extra people gallery

Attributes of "superfluous people" The origins of the "Oblomovism"

Real-fabulous life

Possible happiness and Olga Ilinskaya

Conclusion. Who is to blame for the "Oblomovism"?

Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" continues the gallery of works in which heroes are superfluous for the whole world and for themselves, but not superfluous for the passions boiling in their souls. Oblomov, the protagonist of the novel, following Onegin and Pechorin, goes through the same thorny path of life's disappointments, tries to change something in the world, tries to love, make friends, maintain relationships with acquaintances, but he does not succeed in all this. In the same way as the life of Lermontov and Pushkin's heroes did not work out. And the main characters of all these three works, "Eugene Onegin", "A Hero of Our Time" and "Oblomov", are also similar - pure and bright creatures who could not stay with their beloved. Perhaps a certain type of man attracts a certain type of woman? But why then, such worthless men attract such beautiful women? And, in general, what are the reasons for their worthlessness, were they really born like that, or is it a noble upbringing, or is time to blame for everything? We will also try, using the example of Oblomov, to understand the essence of the problem of “extra people” and try to answer the questions posed.

With the development of the history of "extra people" in literature, a kind of paraphernalia, or things, objects that must be present in each such "extra" character, has developed. Oblomov has all these accessories: a dressing gown, a dusty sofa and an old servant, without whose help he seemed to die. Maybe that's why Oblomov does not go abroad, because there are only "girls" in the servants who do not know how to properly remove the boots from the master. But where did all this come from? It seems that the reason must first of all be sought in the childhood of Ilya Ilyich, in that pampered life that the landowners of that time led and in that inertia that was instilled from childhood: , with strict confirmation to the nanny not to leave the child alone, not to allow him to horses, to dogs, to a goat, not to go far from home, and most importantly, not to let him into the ravine, as the most terrible place in the neighborhood, which had a bad reputation. And, having become an adult, Oblomov also does not allow himself either to horses, or to people, or to the whole world. Why it is in childhood that it is necessary to look for the roots of such a phenomenon as “Oblomovism” is clearly seen when comparing Oblomov with his childhood friend Andrei Stolz. They are of the same age, and of the same social status, but like two different planets colliding in space. Of course, all this can be explained only by the German origin of Stolz, however, what then to be with Olga Ilyinskaya, a Russian young lady who, at her twenty years old, was much more purposeful than Oblomov. And the point here is not even age (Oblomov at the time of the events was about 30 years old), but again in education. Olga grew up in her aunt's house, not restrained by either the strict instructions of her elders or the constant caress, and she learned everything herself. Therefore, she has such an inquisitive mind and a desire to live and act. Indeed, in childhood there was no one who would take care of her, hence the sense of responsibility and the inner core that does not allow to deviate from her principles and way of life. Oblomov, on the other hand, was raised by the women of his family, and this is not his fault, but somewhere his mother's fault, her so-called selfishness towards her child, a life filled with illusions, goblin and brownies, and maybe that was all society, in these domostroevskie times. “Although later the adult Ilya Ilyich finds out that there are no rivers of honey and milk, there are no good sorceresses, although he jokes with a smile over the tales of his nanny, but this smile is not sincere, it is accompanied by a secret sigh: his fairy tale is mixed with life, and he sometimes unconsciously sad, why is a fairy tale not life, and life is not a fairy tale.

Oblomov remained to live in the fairy tales told by the nanny, and could not plunge into real life, because real life, for the most part, is black and gone, and people living in fairy tales have no place in it, because in In real life, everything happens not by a wave of a magic wand, but only thanks to the human will. Stolz says the same thing to Oblomov, but he is so blind and deaf, so captured by petty passions raging in his soul, that sometimes he does not even understand his best friend: “Well, brother Andrei, you are the same! There was one sensible person, and he went crazy. Who travels to America and Egypt! Englishmen: so they are so arranged by the Lord God; and they have nowhere to live at home. And who will go with us? Is it some desperate person who does not care about life. But even Oblomov himself does not care about life. And he is too lazy to live. And it seems that only love, a great and bright feeling, can revive him. But we know that this did not happen, although Oblomov tried very hard.

At the beginning of the birth of relations between Oblomov and Olga Ilyinskaya, the hope is also born in us that “happiness is possible”, and, indeed, Ilya Ilyich is simply transformed. We see him in the bosom of nature, in the country, away from the dusty bustle of the capital, and from the dusty sofa. He is almost like a child, and this village reminds us so much of Oblomovka, when the mind of Ilya Ilyich was still childish and inquisitive, and when the infection of the Russian spleen had not yet had time to creep into his body and soul. Probably, in Olga, he found his mother who died early and just as unquestioningly began to obey her, and was also happy that he took patronage over him, because he himself had not learned to manage his life. But love for Olga is another fairy tale, this time invented by him, although he wholeheartedly believes in it. The “superfluous person” is not able to cultivate this feeling, because it is also superfluous for him, just as he is superfluous for the whole world. However, Oblomov does not lie, confessing his love to Olga, because Olga is indeed a “fairy tale” character, because only a fairy from a fairy tale can fall in love with a person like him. How many wrong things Oblomov does - this is a letter he invented at night, this is a constant fear that they will gossip about them, this is an endlessly protracted affair with the arrangement of the wedding. Circumstances are always higher than Oblomov, and a person who is unable to manage them will certainly slide into the abyss of misunderstanding, despondency and blues. But Olga patiently waits for him, her patience can only be envied, and, finally, Oblomov himself decides to break off relations. The reason is very stupid and not worth it, but such is Oblomov. And this is probably the only act in his life that he could decide on, but the act is stupid and ridiculous: “Who cursed you, Ilya? What did you do? You are kind, smart, gentle, noble... and... you are dying! What ruined you? There is no name for this evil... - There is, - he said in a barely audible voice. She looked at him questioningly, her eyes full of tears. - Oblomovism! This is how one phenomenon ruined the whole life of a person! However, do not forget that it was he, this man, who gave rise to this phenomenon. It did not grow out of nowhere, it was not brought in like a disease, it was carefully cultivated, groomed and cherished in the soul of our hero, and took such strong roots that it is already impossible to pull it out. And when instead of a person we see only this phenomenon, wrapped in an outer shell, then such a person really becomes “superfluous” or ceases to exist altogether. This is how Oblomov quietly dies in the house of the widow Pshenitsyna, the same phenomenon instead of a person.

I would like to think that, nevertheless, society is to blame for such a weak-willed existence of Oblomov, because he lives in a quiet and calm time, free from upheavals, uprisings and wars. Maybe his soul is just calm, because there is no need to fight, worry about the fate of the people, his safety, the safety of his family. At such a time, many people are simply born, live and die, just like in Oblomovka, because time does not require feats from them. But we can say with confidence that if the danger had arisen, Oblomov would not have gone to the barricades under any circumstances. Therein lies his tragedy. And how then to be with Stolz, he is also a contemporary of Oblomov and lives with him in the same country, and in the same city, however, his whole life is like a small feat. No, Oblomov himself is to blame, and this makes it even worse, because in fact he is a good person.

But such is the fate of all "superfluous" people. Unfortunately, it is not enough to just be a good person, you also need to fight and prove it, which Oblomov, unfortunately, could not do. But he became an example for people then and today, an example of who you can become if you are not able not only to manage the events of life, but also yourself. They are “superfluous”, these people, they have no place in life, because it is cruel and merciless, first of all, to the weak and infirm, and because one must always fight for a place in this life!

Bibliography

For the preparation of this work, materials from the site http://www.easyschool.ru/ were used.

Tags: Oblomov and "extra people" Essay Literature

1. What things have become a symbol of "Oblomovism"?

The symbols of "Oblomovism" were a bathrobe, slippers, a sofa.

2. What turned Oblomov into an apathetic couch potato?

Laziness, fear of movement and life, inability to practice, the substitution of life with vague dreaminess turned Oblomov from a man into an appendage of a dressing gown and a sofa.

3. What is the function of Oblomov's dream in I. A. Goncharov's novel "Oblomov"?

The chapter "Oblomov's Dream" draws an idyll of a patriarchal serf village, in which only such Oblomov could grow up. The Oblomovites are shown as sleeping heroes, and Oblomovka as a sleepy kingdom. The dream shows the conditions of Russian life that gave rise to "Oblomovism".

4. Can Oblomov be called "an extra person"?

N. A. Dobrolyubov noted in the article “What is Oblomovism?” that the features of Oblomovism were characteristic to some extent of both Onegin and Pechorin, that is, “superfluous people”. But the "superfluous people" of previous literature were surrounded by a kind of romantic halo, they seemed to be strong people, distorted by reality. Oblomov is also "superfluous", but "reduced from a beautiful pedestal to a soft sofa." AI Herzen said that Onegins and Pechorins treat Oblomov like fathers treat children.

5. What is the peculiarity of the composition of the novel by I. A. Goncharov "Oblomov"?

The composition of the novel by I. A. Goncharov "Oblomov" is characterized by the presence of a double storyline - Oblomov's novel and Stolz's novel. Unity is achieved with the help of the image of Olga Ilyinskaya, which connects both lines. The novel (an immortal work) is built on the contrast of images: Oblomov - Stolz, Olga - Pshenitsyna, Zakhar - Anisya. The entire first part of the novel is an extensive exposition introducing the hero already in adulthood.

6. What role does the epilogue play in I. A. Goncharov's novel "Oblomov"?

The epilogue tells about the death of Oblomov, which made it possible to trace the whole life of the hero from birth to the end.

7. Why is morally pure, honest Oblomov dying morally?

The habit of getting everything from life, without putting any effort into it, developed apathy, inertia in Oblomov, made him a slave of his own laziness. In the final analysis, the feudal system and the domestic upbringing generated by it are to blame for this.

8. How is the complex relationship between slavery and nobility shown in the novel by I. A. Goncharov "Oblomov"?

Serfdom corrupts not only masters, but also slaves. An example of this is the fate of Zakhar. He is as lazy as Oblomov. During the life of the master, he is content with his position. After the death of Oblomov, Zakhar has nowhere to go - he becomes a beggar.

9. What is "Oblomovism"?

"Oblomovism" is a social phenomenon, consisting in laziness, apathy, inertia, contempt for work and an all-consuming desire for peace.

10. Why did Olga Ilyinskaya's attempt to revive Oblomov fail?

Having fallen in love with Oblomov, Olga tries to re-educate him, to break his laziness. But his apathy deprives her of faith in Oblomov's future. Oblomov's laziness was higher and stronger than love.

Stolz is hardly a positive hero. Although, at first glance, this is a new, progressive person, active and active, but there is something in him from a machine, always dispassionate, rational. He is a schematized, unnatural person.

12. Describe Stolz from the novel by I. A. Goncharov "Oblomov".

Stolz is the antipode of Oblomov. He is an active, active person, a bourgeois businessman. He is enterprising, always striving for something. The outlook on life is characterized by the words: "Labor is the image, content, element and purpose of life, at least mine." But Stolz is not capable of experiencing strong feelings; he exudes the calculatedness of each step. The image of Stolz in artistic terms is more schematic and declarative than the image of Oblomov.

At the beginning of the 19th century, a number of works appeared in Russian literature, the main problem of which is the conflict between a person and the society that brought him up. The most outstanding of them were "Eugene Onegin" by A.S. Pushnin and "Hero of Our Time" M.Yu. Lermontov. This is how a special literary type is created and developed - the image of an "extra person", a hero who has not found his place in society, not understood and rejected by his environment. This image changed with the development of society, acquiring new features, qualities, features, until it reached the most vivid and complete embodiment in the novel by I.A. Goncharov "Oblomov".

Goncharov's work is the story of a hero who does not have the makings of a determined fighter, but has all the data to be a good, decent person. The writer “wanted to ensure that the random image that flashed before him was raised to a type, to give it a generic and permanent meaning,” wrote N.A. Dobrolyubov. Indeed, Oblomov is not a new face in Russian literature, "but before it was not exhibited before us as simply and naturally as in Goncharov's novel."

Why can Oblomov be called "an extra person"? What are the similarities and differences between this character and his famous predecessors - Onegin and Pechorin?

Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is a weak-willed, lethargic, apathetic nature, divorced from real life: "Lying ... was his normal state." And this feature is the first thing that distinguishes him from Pushkin's and, especially, Lermontov's heroes.

The life of Goncharov's character is rosy dreams on a soft sofa. Slippers and a dressing gown are indispensable companions of Oblomov's existence and bright, accurate artistic details that reveal Oblomov's inner essence and external way of life. Living in a fictional world, fenced off by dusty curtains from reality, the hero devotes his time to building unrealizable plans, does not bring anything to the end. Any of his undertakings suffers the fate of a book that Oblomov has been reading for several years on one page.

However, the inaction of Goncharov's character was not elevated to such an extreme degree as in Manilov's poem by N.V. Gogol's "Dead Souls", and, as Dobrolyubov correctly noted, "Oblolov is not a dull, apathetic nature, without aspirations and feelings, but a person who is also looking for something in his life, thinking about something ...".

Like Onegin and Pechorin, Goncharov's hero in his youth was a romantic, longing for an ideal, burning with a desire for activity, but, like them, Oblomov's "flower of life" "bloomed and did not bear fruit." Oblomov became disillusioned with life, lost interest in knowledge, realized the worthlessness of his existence and, literally and figuratively, "lay down on the sofa", believing that in this way he would be able to maintain the integrity of his personality.

So the hero "lay" his life, without bringing any visible benefit to society; “slept through” the love that passed him by. One can agree with the words of his friend Stolz, who figuratively noted that Oblomov's "trouble began with the inability to put on stockings and ended with the inability to live."

Thus, the main difference between Oblomov's "extra person" and Onegin's and Pechorin's "extra people" is that the latter denied social vices in action - real deeds and actions (see Onegin's life in the village, Pechorin's communication with the "water society") , while the first "protested" on the couch, spending his whole life in immobility and inactivity. Therefore, if Onegin and Pechorin are “moral cripples” to a greater extent due to the fault of society, then Oblomov is mainly due to the fault of his own apathetic nature.

In addition, if the type of “superfluous person” is universal and characteristic not only for Russian, but also for foreign literature (B. Constant, A. de Musset, etc.), then, considering the features of the social and spiritual life of Russia in the 19th century, it can be noted that that Oblomovism is a purely Russian phenomenon, generated by the reality of that time. It is no coincidence that Dobrolyubov saw in Oblomov "our indigenous, folk type."

So, in the novel by I.A. Goncharov "Oblomov", the image of the "superfluous person" receives its final embodiment and development. If in the works of A.S. Pushkin and M.Yu. Lermontov reveals the tragedy of one human soul that has not found its place in society, Goncharov depicts a whole phenomenon of Russian social and spiritual life, called "Oblomovism" and incorporating the main vices of one of the characteristic types of noble youth of the 50s of the XIX century.

Other works on the topic:

I. A. Goncharov in his novel explores human nature, and if in the images of Oblomov and Stolz we find, as it were, two extremes (cordiality, but passivity and activity to the detriment of the soul), then in the image of Olga Ilyinskaya, from my point of view, not only the best features of a Russian woman, but also all the best that the writer saw in a Russian man.

Love, the strongest human feeling, has played a big role in life. Oblomov. The love of two women, one smart, refined, gentle, demanding, the other economic, ingenuous, accepting the hero as he is.

The image of Oblomov consists, as it were, of parts. There is Oblomov, a moldy, almost ugly, greasy, clumsy piece of meat. There is Oblomov in love with Olga Oblomov who is deeply touching and sympathetic in his sad comedy.

at the center of the novel. Goncharova Oblomov is a complex and controversial image of a landowner. Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. In the first part of the novel, the seemingly most obvious features of his personality are depicted - laziness, lack of will, contemplation.

I want to write about two women who played a huge role in the life of one man. This person. Ilya Ilyich Oblomov is the main character of the novel by I. A. Goncharov and one of my favorite literary characters.

Autumn evening. There is no one at home, and I am reading Goncharov's novel. Strange all the same hero - Ilya Ilyich Oblomov. He patiently endures all the blows of fate, resigns himself to constant crop shortages in the village and Zakhar's laziness, to the fact that he is constantly deceived, robbed, and abused by his inherent kindness. He does not seek to achieve wealth, fame, position in society.

Goncharov considered the main task of his novel "Oblomov" to be the search for a truly human "norm" of being, lost in the modern world, and a hero who meets this "norm". But the peculiarity of the embodiment of this author's intention was that the "artistic ideal" of the individual is unattainable. It seems to fall into two parts, two main images - Oblomov and Stolz, which are depicted on the basis of the principle of antithesis.

The plot and composition of the novel Oblomov Roman Goncharova "Oblomov" is strictly and distinctly subordinated to the division of the Russian calendar into four seasons. This is evidenced by the composition of Goncharov's masterpiece. The events taking place in it begin in the spring of May 1. The most stormy action falls on the summer - the love of Oblomov and Olga.

Undoubtedly, in order to solve the artistic task that Goncharov set for himself in the novel Oblomov, he needed not just a beautiful and intelligent woman, but a woman whose image would be as close to the ideal as possible. The author did just that: Olga, in her development, represents the highest ideal that only a Russian artist could evoke from that Russian life.

Andrei Stolz is Oblomov's closest friend, they grew up together and carried their friendship through life. It remains a mystery how such dissimilar people with such different outlooks on life could maintain a deep attachment.

Oblomov's personality is far from ordinary, although other characters treat him with slight disrespect. For some reason, they read it almost flawed compared to them. This was precisely the task of Olga Ilyinskaya - to wake up Oblomov, to force him to prove himself as an active person.

The image of Oblomov in Russian literature closes a number of "superfluous" people. An inactive contemplative, incapable of active action, at first glance really seems incapable of a great and bright feeling, but is it really so? In the life of Ilya Ilyich Oblomov there is no place for global and cardinal changes.

Roman I.A. Goncharov's "Oblomov" permeates the pathos of social criticism. The clash of two heroes (Ilya Oblomov and Andrei Stolz), two opposing lifestyles can be viewed in a broad public context.

A person is largely shaped by childhood. Hence the meaning of "Oblomov's Dream" in the novel. It is no coincidence that Goncharov called it "the overture of the entire novel." Yes, this is the key to the whole work, the solution to all its mysteries.

Mini-composition "Oblomov and his entourage" Author: Goncharov I.A. Oblomov is a backwardness that hinders historical progress. Oblomov is sincere, gentle, his conscience is not lost; subjectively he is incapable of doing evil. The storyline depicts the spiritual desolation of the hero, there is nobility and slavery in him - he is a slave to his couch, laziness.

The image of Oblomov is the greatest creation of I. A. Goncharov. This type of hero, in general, is not new to Russian literature. We meet with him in the comedy "Lazy" by Fonvizin, and in Gogol's "Marriage". But the image of Oblomov from the novel of the same name by Goncharov became the most complete and multifaceted embodiment of it.

The first impression that the hero of I. Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" makes on the reader is the impression of laziness, immobility, boredom.

"Oblomov's Dream" is a special chapter of the novel. "Oblomov's Dream" tells about the childhood of Ilya Ilyich, about his influence on the character of Oblomov. In Oblomov's Dream, his native village of Oblomovka, his family, the way they lived on the Oblomov estate, are shown. Oblomovka is the name of two villages owned by the Oblomovs.

The reasons that prompted Oblomov to write a letter to Olga. How does Oblomov appear to readers in his letter.

Before starting my discussion on the topic: does Russia need the Oblomovs? I want to talk about I.S. Goncharov and his great work. I.S. Goncharov writer of the second half of the 19th century.

Goncharov began writing the novel Oblomov in 1846. At that time, Russia was a feudal-serf country. The oppression of the serfs reached its limits.

The novel "Oblomov" was created on the eve of the peasant reform, in 1859. The main idea is to show the pernicious influence of serfdom on the life of peasants and landowners. We see this very influence in the example of one landowner Oblomov.

Did Oblomov ever have a clarification in his life? Yes, and not just once. Love brought him back to life. The love of two women - one: refined, tender, graceful, and the other: economic, ingenuous, sincere. Who can understand Ilya Oblomov?

The image of Oblomov is the greatest artistic generalization, embodying the typical character traits generated by the Russian patriarchal landlord life.

“Oblomov's Dream” is a magnificent episode of Goncharov's novel “Oblomov”. In my opinion, a dream is nothing more than an attempt by Goncharov himself to clarify himself; that is the essence of Oblomov and Oblomovism.

A miracle happened: a man was born. Who will he be? Will it benefit society? Will he be happy? So far, no one knows this yet ... A miracle happened: they raised a Man from a little man. What was laid down by nature: a heart of gold, the ability to experience strong feelings, kindness, but at the same time laziness, remained.

What are the life ideals of Stolz? (Based on the novel "Oblomov" by I.A. Goncharov) Author: Goncharov I.A. In I.A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov”, Andrey Stolz is the antipode of Oblomov. Every feature of Stolz is a blatant protest against the qualities of Oblomov. The first loves an active and interesting life, the second often falls into apathy, he is like a snail that is afraid to get out of its shell.

The problems of I. A. Goncharov's novel "Oblomov" Author: Goncharov I.A. Oblomov was published in Otechestvennye Zapiski starting in January 1859, in installments over a period of four months, and provoked a stormy response from critics. In Dobrolyubov's article "What is Oblomovism?" the problems of the novel were considered in sociological terms, Oblomov's tin was interpreted as the embodiment of all the class vices of the nobility, while the philosophical aspect of Oblomov was left without consideration.

Plot antitheses in the novel "Oblomov" Author: Goncharov I.A. 1. Oblomov - Stolz. 2. Oblomov - Olga Ilyinskaya Stolz is not a positive hero of the novel, his activity sometimes resembles the activity of Sudbinsky from the despised Stolz of Oblomov's Petersburg entourage: work, work, work again, like a machine, without rest, entertainment and hobbies.

Oblomov is opposed in the novel by Andrei Stoltz. Initially, he was conceived by Goncharov as a positive hero, a worthy antipode to Oblomov. The author dreamed that over time many "Stoltsev will appear under Russian names."

An essay on whether Oblomov and Stolz, the main characters of Goncharov's novel Oblomov, should be re-educated. The author comes to the conclusion that the way of life is his purely personal matter, and re-educating Oblomov and Stolz is not only useless, but also inhumane.

(According to one of the works of Russian literature of the 19th century) ... at the base of Oblomov's nature lay a pure and good beginning, filled with deep sympathy for everything that is good and that only opened and responded to the call of this ... heart.