How do features correlate in the image of Chatsky. Characteristics of Chatsky in "Woe from Wit" (with quotes)
Feb 18 2015
The comedy "Woe from Wit" is considered one of the most famous works of Griboyedov. B shows the subtle Human character traits that have existed and will always exist in Russia. Griboyedov wrote this Comedy at the time when the Decembrists were creating secret revolutionary organizations. The comedy shows the confrontation between two forces: the old world of aristocrats and the new young generation of people in Russia. The action of the comedy takes place in the house of the Moscow master Famusov. The main role, of course, is the role of Chatsky, without which there would be no comedy, but, perhaps, there would be a picture of morals.
Before the arrival of the young Educated A. A. Chatsky, everything was calm, flowing as usual. But it all starts with the arrival of Alexander Andreevich. Chatsky is a smart young gentleman. He returns to Moscow from abroad and immediately appears at Famusov's house. Chatsky is in love with Sophia, he missed her and therefore immediately goes to Famusov's house.
His first words: “A little light on my feet! and I am at your feet." Chatsky's love for Sophia is not the main idea of the work, but the main thing in this comedy is Chatsky's opposition to the Russian nobility. In the image of Chatsky, Griboyedov showed many of the Qualities of an advanced person of that era.
Chatsky fights against violence and serfdom. Chatsky's monologues and remarks, in all his actions, expressed what was most important for the future Decembrists: the spirit of Liberty, a free life, the feeling that \"breathes more freely than anyone\". Freedom of the individual is the motive of time and Griboedov's Comedy.
He is trying to fight against the Famus society. Chatsky's desire to serve the fatherland,\"cause, not people\". He hates all the past, including slavish worship of everything foreign, servility, servility.
And what does he see around him? A lot of People who are looking only for ranks, crosses, \"money to live\", not love, but a profitable marriage. Their ideal is \"moderation and accuracy\", their dream is\"to take away all the books and burn them\". So, in the center of the comedy is the Conflict between "one sane person" (Griboedov's assessment) and the conservative majority.
As always in a dramatic work, the essence of the main character is revealed primarily in the plot. Griboyedov showed the plight of a young progressive person in this society. The environment takes revenge on Chatsky for the Truth, which pricks his eyes, for trying to break the usual way of life. Beloved girl, turning away from Him, hurts the hero the most, spreading gossip about his madness.
Here is the paradox: the only sane one is declared insane! \"So! I've sobered up completely!\” exclaims Chatsky at the end of the play. What is this defeat or victory? Yes, the end of this comedy is far from being cheerful, but Goncharov is right when he said this about the Finale: \"Chatsky is broken by the amount of old strength, inflicting a mortal blow on it with the quality of Fresh strength\" Under the faces of Skalozub, Molchalin, Khlyostova and other guests of Famusov Griboedov showed all of Moscow at that time.
All these landowners value money, fame, titles. Famusov says: “Be poor, but if there are two thousand family souls, that one is the groom.” Famusov wants to marry Sophia to a rich man.
All members of the Famus Society value the lives of their servants and serfs on a par with animals. Chatsky loses his temper with anger When he learns that one master has exchanged his servants for greyhounds. Molchalin is a vile and low person, he pleases everyone who can be useful to him. For all the people present in Famusov's house, Chatsky is the Enemy because people like him can destroy the world of Famusov society. All of them cater to those who are richer than them, and Chatsky despises all flatterers.
He says: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve.” That is why Chatsky left the civil service. Famusov says about Chatsky: “A dangerous person" Chatsky about Molchalin: “Why not a husband? There is only a little mind in him.” And the whole society together about Chatsky: “Learning is a plague, learning is the reason that today is more forest than when people and deeds and opinions were crazy divorced.” In this society, everyone takes care of himself and hates the Other. Chatsky is a smart person. He hates and fights the Famus society.
More than anything else, Chatsky Hates serfdom and considers it the cause of all troubles. Alexander Andreevich loves his people, he calls Him “our smart, kind people.” He wants to see the Russian people cultured and educated. Chatsky is a smart, intelligent person, and in Famusov's society such people are considered free-thinking and dangerous. Griboedov opposed Chatsky to all other heroes. Chatsky sees the meaning of life not in his well-being, but in serving the Motherland, his People. Chatsky protests against such as Famusov, Skalozub, Molchalin, but he is unable to cope with this Society and he is declared crazy.
The views of Chatsky are close to the views of the Decembrists. In this comedy, grief from wit is the grief of a smart, honest, proud Person who is considered a stranger in this society. Mind brought Chatsky one grief and disappointment.
A. S. Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" is considered immortal. It hasn't worn out over the years. Chatsky is inevitable With each change of one century to another.
Each case that needs updating causes the shadow of Chatsky. This is the secret of the eternal relevance of the play and the vitality of its characters. Yes, the idea of a "free life" truly has lasting value. Reading this, we see that in our time there are people like Famusov, Skalozub, Mochalin - arrogant, selfish, proud, who put themselves above everyone else.
But there are also those like Chatsky, who will fight and defeat injustice. And today this one serves as an occasion for readers to Reflect on our life. compositions: Ilya Sofronov ru
Need a cheat sheet? Then save - "The image of Chatsky. Literary writings!Article menu:
The image of Alexander Chatsky successfully combined the features of a Byronic hero and an extra person. He is the herald of new orders, a man ahead of his time. That is why his personality is clearly contrasted in the comedy with all other characters, and he is, in fact, lonely and misunderstood by his society.
Family, childhood and youth of the hero
Alexander Andreevich Chatsky is a hereditary nobleman, an aristocrat by birth. He was born in Moscow and from childhood was well received in the world of high society so desired by many. Chatsky's parents died early, leaving their son a significant estate as an inheritance.
Dear readers! We suggest that you familiarize yourself with the characteristics of the Famus society in the comedy by A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit"
Alexander Andreevich has no brothers and sisters - he is the only child in the family. Most likely, Chatsky had no other relatives (even distant ones), since after the death of his parents, Chatsky was taken in by a friend of his father, Pavel Famusov, an official and a noble person in the circles of the aristocracy and Moscow circles in particular.
Chatsky lives in the house of Pavel Afanasyevich for some time. Having matured, he goes on an independent voyage. Apparently, Famusov was a good teacher, since Chatsky had pleasant memories of him. Alexander Andreevich arrives at Famusov's house full of positive thoughts and friendly intentions.
Chatsky is a member of the English Club - a gentlemen's club for aristocrats. The English club provided for a diverse expression of social and political life. However, in general, it was reduced to card games and dinners. Apparently, Alexander Andreevich was not a frequent guest. At first, this was due to his age, in the future, Chatsky goes abroad, which a priori makes it impossible to visit this club. After a three-year period, Chatsky returns to his homeland, where the main events of Griboyedov's comedy take place.
Abroad, Alexander Andreevich gets the opportunity not only to be impressed by the peculiarities of the architecture and cultural heritage of Europe, but also to learn about the peculiarities of the relationship between people, their social and social position.
Personality characteristic
Like any other aristocrat, Chatsky received a basic education, which included the basic concept of arranging the world and the economy, was taught foreign languages (in particular French, as the most common of all foreign languages). In addition, Alexander Andreevich was trained in dance and music - it was commonplace for the aristocracy. On this, Chatsky's education did not end, but turned into the hypostasis of self-development. Alexander Andreevich actively explores the world and is engaged in independent study and deepening of his knowledge in one category or another. An active and inquisitive personality type and an inquisitive mind allowed Chatsky to accumulate a significant amount of knowledge, thanks to which he became a philosopher without reaching gray hair.
Chatsky was previously in the military, but he soon became disillusioned with his military career and resigned. Alexander Andreevich did not enter the civil service. She had little interest in him.
He plans to dedicate his future life to the affairs of his estate. However, in the eyes of the public, such an act looks like an unthinkable action - others believe that an adequate person cannot do this, because it is thanks to these two types of activity that a young person can make a name for himself and earn authority in society - other types of activity, even if they are beneficial and do not contradict the rules and principles of morality are not accepted by others and are considered absurd.
Chatsky does not consider it a disadvantage to express his position freely - he thinks that this should be the norm in an educated society.
His speech is often sarcastic and ironic. Apparently, this is due to his frank opposition to other representatives of society. He is a sincere person, Chatsky believes that it is necessary to tell people the truth - he does not accept deceit and lies. Alexander Andreevich has a sensitive and sincere disposition. He is a passionate person, so it is difficult for him to restrain his emotions.
Chatsky recognizes the need for science and art in human life. People who neglect their education and development disgust Chatsky.
He sincerely loves his homeland and is overwhelmed by the desire to improve the life of his people, not only at the level of the aristocracy, but also at the level of ordinary people.
Chatsky's life position and his conflict with the Famus Society
Chatsky actively opposes the so-called Famus society - a group of aristocrats united by the personality of his tutor, an important official - Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov. In fact, on the basis of this group of aristocrats, a typical situation in aristocratic circles is shown. It is not unique personalities who speak through the mouths of representatives of the Famus society, but typical ones, characteristic of high society. And their position is not exclusively theirs, but a common occurrence.
On our site you have the opportunity to get acquainted with the image of Famusov in Alexander Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit".
First of all, the difference between Chatsky and his vision from Famusov and his hangers-on lies in the attitude to doing business and the peculiarities of moving up the career ladder - in the world of the aristocracy everything is decided by bribes and mutual responsibility - honor and pride have long been forgotten by high society. They are ready to admire people who serve and are ready to please their boss in every possible way - no one appreciates people who do their job well, professionals in their field, and this is very upsetting for a young man. To the special amazement of Alexander Andreevich, not only their own people take bribes, but also foreigners, for whom this is an unacceptable business.
The next stumbling block was the attitude towards activities, as well as towards science and art. In the vision of aristocrats, only civil service or military service is worthy of attention and honor - they consider other activities to be second-rate and shameful for a person of noble birth. They subject the servants of science and the muse to special hatred and persecution. This position lies, first of all, in the absolute neglect of education. Almost all representatives of the Famus society think that science and education do not bring any benefit, but only take away people's strength and time. Approximately the same opinion they have about art. People who are ready to engage in science or art, they consider abnormal and are ready to ridicule in every possible way.
Chatsky also gives an unsatisfactory characterization to the landowners, having analyzed their attitude towards serfs - very often serfs are nobody for the nobles - they can be a commodity or a living toy in the hands of the aristocracy. This applies not only to people who dishonestly performed their duties, but also to those who diligently serve their landowner. Nobles can sell their serfs and even trade them for dogs. In general, Griboyedov, neither personally nor with the help of his heroes, never campaigned or criticized serfdom in general, nor was he a supporter of it. His criticism is not directed at the very construction of relationships, but at specific cases of cruelty and injustice on the part of the landlords towards their serfs.
Chatsky and Sonya Famusova
Alexander Chatsky and Sonya Famusova were old acquaintances - they knew each other from childhood. After the death of Chatsky's parents, the girl actually replaced his sister - their relationship was always friendly and positive. As they grew older, they began to change, and childhood affection and friendship were replaced by falling in love. However, Chatsky's trip and the fact that he left Famusov prevented the novel from developing fully, which Sonya perceived not as a routine associated with Chatsky's achievement of a new stage in life - independent formation, but as a disappointment. In her opinion, Chatsky left their house because he got bored with life there.
On his trip, Chatsky took away not only warm memories of his teacher, but also a love for his daughter, Sonya. Upon returning home, he hoped to renew their relationship and develop it. Alexander Andreevich saw his future wife in the image of Sonya. However, immediately after his arrival, he was sharply upset in his intentions to marry the girl by her father, who believed that an exceptionally rich man who was ready to pursue his career could apply for the position of his son-in-law. Chatsky did not fit the criteria - he was wealthy, but not rich enough, and he completely abandoned his career, which was perceived extremely negatively by Famusov. From that time on, Famusov's childhood admiration gradually began to melt.
Alexander Andreevich hopes that the girl's feelings towards him are sincere, and they will be able to convince her father of the need for a wedding. Sonya reciprocates Chatsky, however, over time it turns out that his beloved is no better than her father. Her gratitude and reciprocity is just a game for the public, in fact, the girl loves another person, and Chatsky was just fooling.
Annoyed, Chatsky denounces the girl for misbehavior and sincerely rejoices that he did not become her husband, because this would be a real punishment.
Thus, Alexander Chatsky's image is generally humane and full of desire to change the lives of the people around him for the better. He sincerely believes in the benefit of science and art, and people who pay attention to their development arouse his interest and admiration. According to Chatsky, lies and self-interest should fade into the background, and goodness and humanity should take its place. People, in his understanding, should live, guided by the laws of morality, and not by personal gain.
Chatsky, as a representative of a new generation of nobles, rejects the admiration for everything European that is inherent in Famus society and the "past century"; he is a patriot and has respect for national traditions. These qualities are revealed in the above passage.
Alexander Andreevich is indignant at the fact that Russia cannot be distinguished from France - "not the sound of a Russian, not a Russian face", and that the Russians themselves bow before France. This imitation of the French Chatsky calls "empty, slavish, blind", because it leads to the oblivion of all Russian, native - "mores, language, holy antiquity." According to Chatsky, cultivated Western customs do not carry anything exceptionally good, on the contrary, he says that European clothes are “according to the clownish model” and ridicules Western fashion, putting Russian traditions in an advantage over European ones.
All of the above shows that Chatsky is a patriot of Russia and a supporter of the fact that Russia should go its own way and abandon blind copying.
_______________________
Chatsky's character belongs to the literary type of the "superfluous person" Since Chatsky cannot find someone who would share his views, the hero's worldview can only be expressed in monologues.
Chatsky is the engine of both socio-moral and love conflict in comedy, and his monologues reveal the essence of both conflicts.
The image of Alexander Andreevich as a new type of nobleman, condemning servility and servility, is born, first of all, in a monologue about "the present century and the past century." Chatsky calls Famusov's age "the age of humility and fear", in which only those "whose neck bent more often" were famous. He condemns hypocrisy and pretense, which were valued in the "past age", and says that now everything is different.
Actually, this monologue outlines the conflict between Chatsky and the Famus society, and also makes the reader or viewer understand what the essence of this conflict is.
Further development of the antithesis of Chatsky as a representative of the new generation of the nobility and Famus society as representatives of the outgoing era takes place in the monologue of Chatsky, delivered under Famusov and Skalozub. "Who are the judges?" - Chatsky asks, pointing out that in the "past century" there are no people who would be a worthy example to follow. Here the reader or viewer understands even more what bold and progressive views Chatsky adheres to, who, among other things, indirectly condemned serfdom, remembering the landowner, who bought small children separately from their parents for the peasant theater and thus forever separated the families of serfs.
Many of Chatsky's monologues are addressed to Sofia Famusova. Such, for example, is the monologue about the "Frenchman from Bordeaux", where Chatsky appears as a patriot and opponent of the fashion for everything foreign. The hero of Griboedov makes this speech in response to Sophia's question about what makes him so angry, rejoicing at the opportunity to express to his beloved girl everything that worries him.
Despite the fact that this monologue is addressed to Sophia, it is more about a conflict of beliefs than a love conflict, however, Chatsky's love drama is also revealed through the monologues of this character. For example, when asking Sophia about Molchalin, Chatsky talks about the ardor of his feelings, that every moment his heart strives for Sophia.
From Chatsky's monologues, we learn that Alexander Andreevich returned to Moscow for the sake of Sophia, that he was madly eager to meet her, and then about his disappointment and bitterness. Thanks to this, the reader or viewer gets the opportunity to understand Chatsky's feelings and put himself in his place.
Thus, Chatsky's monologues reveal his image and participation in two conflicts of the play, reflect his attitude towards the Famus society and Sophia.
Updated: 2018-03-02
Attention!
Thank you for your attention.
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.
There are different statements about the genre of A.S. Griboyedov’s play “Woe from Wit”. It is called both comedy and drama.
Let's start with the arguments in favor of comedy. Indeed, in the play, the main technique used by the author is comic inconsistencies. So, for example, Famusov, a manager in a state-owned place, says this about his attitude to business: "My custom like this: / Signed, so off your shoulders. Comic inconsistencies are encountered in the speech and behavior of the characters. Famusov preaches his modesty in front of Sophia: "Monastic known for behavior, and at the same time we see him flirting with Lisa: "Oh! potion, spoiler…”. The first stage direction of the play already bears traces of comic inconsistency: to the sounds of a flute and piano that are heard from Sophia's bedroom, "Lizanka is sleeping in the middle of the room, hanging from armchairs." To create comic situations, the “talk of the deaf” technique is used: Chatsky’s monologue in act III, the conversation of the countess-grandmother with Prince Tugoukhovsky. The language of the play is the language of comedy (colloquial, accurate, light, witty, rich in aphorisms). In addition, the traditional comic roles are preserved in the play: Chatsky is an unlucky lover, Molchalin is a successful lover and cunning, Famusov is a father whom everyone deceives, Liza is a shrewd, clever servant. All this allows us to rightfully classify the play "Woe from Wit" as a comedy.
But comedy is based on a dramatic conflict between the hero and society, and it is not resolved in a comedic way. The drama of the protagonist Chatsky lies in the fact that he suffers grief from his mind, which is deep in its critical attitude towards the world of famous and pufferfish. Chatsky condemns the inhumanity of serfdom, he is disgusted by the lack of freedom of thought in a noble society, he is full of sincere patriotism: “Will we ever rise again from the foreign power of fashion? / So that our smart, peppy people / Although the language did not consider us Germans". In a society "where he is famous, whose neck often bent", Chatsky's independence makes him a "dangerous person."
The second argument in favor of the drama is the personal tragedy of Chatsky, the collapse of his hopes in relations with Sophia. Chatsky cannot understand how Sophia can love the insignificant Molchalin: “Here I am donated to whom!” But the last blow for Chatsky is the news that Sophia "she herself called him crazy." Insignificance does not tolerate high things in its environment, which confuses, teases low people. And it declares nobility to be madness. Chatsky is a tragic hero who finds himself in a comic situation.
The combination of comedy and drama in Griboyedov's play is organic. Both sides of life - dramatic and comedic - are considered in the play in close connection with each other.
In his comedy "" Griboedov showed us how one innovator tried to change the representatives of the "past century", but was crushed and forced to flee outside Moscow. This innovator is the main character of the comedy Alexander Chatsky.
Chatsky was a very smart and progressive person, he lived in step with the times. The whole comedy of Griboedov is built on the conflict between the protagonist and representatives of Moscow high society: Famusov, Skalozub. Chatsky does not understand and does not accept the philosophy of these people. He does not share the thoughts and impulses of his opponents. In a dispute, his famous monologues are born, in which he acts as a preacher of his ideas. Chatsky was not the kind of person who only talks about what is needed, he did not know how to remain silent. He doesn't even seem to care if anyone listens to him or not. For him, the main thing is to convey his idea, his vision.
In his first monologue, “And the world just began to grow stupid ...” Chatsky draws parallels between the past and the coming century. We learn from him that the main character does not accept the developed bureaucracy, subservience. That is why he did not go to public service.
In the next monologue, “Who are the judges,” Chatsky condemns the enthusiasm for military affairs. After all, it kills in a person any desire for creativity, for knowledge of the world. Military drill kills a person's personality, the possibility of independent decision-making.
Chatsky firmly believes that his ideas will be gladly accepted by the Famus society. He believes in changing the consciousness of other comedy characters, in the opportunity to look at the world with different eyes.
Unfortunately, Chatsky's dreams were not destined to come true. Faced with the philosophy of his peers Molchalin and Skalozub, the main character realizes that nothing can be changed. These people live by the rules of the last century. Nobody listens to his ideas and nobody shares them. The whole philosophy of Chatsky failed, he was deceived in his dreams and aspirations.
At the end of the work, we no longer see that young man blinded by his ideas. Chatsky, having got rid of illusions, nevertheless retained his convictions. He remained a connoisseur of human freedom, the right to choose. He advocates the abolition of serfdom and the elevation of the individual as an independent unit of society.
In his last monologue “I won’t come to my senses”, we see that Chatsky did not give up his convictions, having left Moscow, he began to look for a place where his ideas would be accepted: “... I’ll go looking around the world where there is a corner for an offended feeling!”.
In the image of Chatsky, we see a strong and purposeful person who did not cave in under the "rotten" world. He firmly believed in the realization of his ideas and the coming of a better future.
