home › Light and glass › Why did Andriy become a traitor? based on the story Taras Bulba (Gogol N.)

Why did Andriy become a traitor? based on the story Taras Bulba (Gogol N.)

The direction of loyalty and betrayal is well revealed in Gogol's story "Taras Bulba". Of particular importance here is the problem of loyalty and treason to the Motherland. In the story, we can discuss these issues from different angles. For example, on the one hand we see big picture. The Cossacks are going through a difficult stage, where they have to defend their rights and defend their homeland again and again. On the other hand, we observe the personal history of Taras Bulba and his family.

To write a quality essay about fidelity and treason in Taras Bulba, you need to use the following arguments:

1. Taras Bulba is strong man who always sticks to his beliefs. He is true to himself, his convictions and his Motherland. WITH early years he cultivated these qualities in his sons. Taras quarreled with his friends if they went over to the side of the enemy, renounced the Orthodox faith. Conviction and loyalty were the main priority in the life of the protagonist.

2. Treason and betrayal is shown in "Taras Bulba" on the example of the son of Taras Andriy.

It was good man who excelled in many areas. But one day he faced a choice - either he will go over to the side of the enemy for the sake of his beloved, or remain faithful to his family and homeland. Andrew chose the first option.

3. The eldest son of Taras, Ostap, is not revealed to us in the story in the same way, but from the words of the author, we clearly understand that he adopted all the principles from his father. It is its continuation.

4. The main tragedy the story was the fight between Taras and Andriy. He could not see the betrayal of his son, and he himself could not betray his duty and the Motherland. So he kills his son. This outcome shows how strong main character. After all, fatherly love has not gone anywhere.

He loves his son, but such betrayal leaves him no choice.

5. At the end of the story, Taras dies. Seeing the death of both sons, he also endures terrible execution- burning alive But in the image of Taras there is no regret. He knows he did everything right. He was faithful to his Motherland, his faith, his principles.

Taras Bulba is perfect piece in order to write an essay in the direction of loyalty and treason.

Effective preparation for the exam (all subjects) - start preparing

Updated: 2017-11-14

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.

In the scene of the decisive explanation with Andriy, her image is fanned with lyricism, her words flow like music: “She threw away the handkerchief from herself, pulled back the long hair her braids and all overflowed in pitiful speeches, pronouncing them in a quiet, quiet voice: “Am I not worthy of eternal complaints? Is not the mother who gave birth to me unhappy? Was it not a bitter fate for me? Are you not my fierce executioner, my ferocious fate?

Andriy, in the first minutes of the meeting, could not find words to adequately answer the lady to the expression of her gratitude and "was indignant at his Cossack nature." This is a remark that should be paid attention to, since it indicates that Andriy, who used to dream of becoming a Cossack, is now looking for a different measure of values for himself and is ashamed of being a Cossack. When he saw in the eyes of the Polish woman more than gratitude, he completely lost his head and was ready for anything. This is evidenced by the words of Andriy, addressed to the Pole: “What do you need? What do you want? Command me! Give me the most impossible service in the world - I will run to fulfill it! Tell me to do what no man can do - I will do it, I will destroy myself. I'll lose, I'll lose." Everyone often notices for themselves that it is the Pole who reminds Andrsho, what is his duty and covenant, ”reminds that Andria is called “father, comrades, fatherland”, and the Poles and she are their enemies.

What is Andriy's answer? Of course, this is already the reprimand of a traitor: “And what about my father, comrades, fatherland? .. So if so, then this is what: I don’t have anyone! No one, no one!.. Who said that my homeland is Ukraine? Who gave it to me in the homeland? The fatherland is what our soul seeks, which is sweeter for it than anything. My motherland is you! Here is my homeland! And I will carry the homeland that is in my heart, I will carry it until it becomes my age, and I will see if one of the Cossacks will tear it out of there! And everything that is, I will sell, give, ruin for such a homeland!

The teacher will draw the attention of readers to the fact that Andriy openly affirms those moral principles, which determine its behavior. For him, only personal desires and aspirations matter (“Fatherland is what our soul is looking for, which is sweeter for it than anything”). The impetuousness of affirming these principles is manifested in Andrii's speech, which corresponds to his character and the given situation. Andriy is completely in the power of the excitement that has seized him, in the power of the feeling that has flared up in him; he is pathetic in his confession. His speech “replete with exclamatory intonations, synonyms collide in it: “I will sell, I will give, I will destroy”; there are forcing phrases-repetitions: “I’ll carry it in my heart”, “I’ll carry it until it becomes my century”, “We’ll see if one of the Kozaks will vomit ...”, etc.
How does the author feel about what happened? How do we feel? In response to the questions posed, the teacher will read a lyrical digression full of bitter regret: “And the Cossack died! Lost for the entire Cossack chivalry! He will never see Zaporozhye again, nor his father's farms, nor God's church! Ukraine will also not see the bravest of its children who undertook to defend it. Old Taras will tear out a gray tuft of hair from his chuprina and curse both the day and the hour in which he gave birth to such a son to shame.

When reading, you need to convey to readers a high emotional mood this digression, in which she found such an exhaustive expression of the bitterness of the loss of the bravest of the Cossacks and the tragedy of Andriy's betrayal. From now on, Andriy will forever and irrevocably be expelled from the ranks of the Cossacks, he is no longer a Cossack. He is rejected by the Motherland. He will be cursed by his father, by his comrades.

It seems to us that just now the moment has come for a big and serious conversation about what kind of person Andriy is. Why did he, the bravest of the Cossack chivalry, not become his glory and pride? It also becomes clear what moral and aesthetic principles he is a representative of and what our attitude towards these principles is. Which moral lesson should be drawn from the dramatic situation in which Andria has been plunged into life? In order to fully answer these questions, we have previously traced the process of formation of Andriy's personality, found out the features of his nature and character.

What exactly was revealed? It turns out that Andriy believes that he is a free person, that he is free to dispose of himself as he wants, to do as he sees fit. He considers only his desires to be the law for himself. He does not want to give an account to anyone of his aspirations and inclinations. These principles are his moral guide. Young, ardent, he surrendered without hesitation and without hesitation to the desire of his heart. Didn't he have a right to? - may object to us. And doesn’t the passion for the Polish woman inspire Andrii, enrich him spiritual world, does not give it the power of conquering charm?

But after all, a person lives in society, and society has the right to demand from the individual the same thing that she demands from society: respect, understanding of the interests of society. The individual and society are inextricably linked. And only when the general and the personal are in an organic combination - only then, says Belinsky, is there a life full of deep and reasonable content - both personal and general. If they do not coincide, are in irreconcilable contradiction, then a collision is inevitable, and then an individual person is either a winner or a loser.

In full accordance with this statement, the nature of Andriy's feelings for the Pole is also considered. In Evenings on a Farm near Dikapkp, love is a big, beautiful feeling. It ennobles a person, reveals his best qualities (Vakula, Levko). Love, which owns Andrn, did not include it in the wide world. On the contrary, it shielded both the world and people from him. Disregarding nothing but his feelings, Andriy freed himself from responsibility to his comrades. And this led Andrii to the loss of honor and love, which brings dishonor to a person, is criminal.The author leads the reader to such an idea.

The conversation about how Andriy came to betrayal ends with reading out the words that he spoke to the innkeeper Yankel: “Tell your father, tell your brother, tell the Cossacks, tell the Cossacks, tell everyone that father is no longer my father, brother is not brother, a comrade is not a comrade, and that I will fight with them with everyone. This is already being said by a conscious enemy, for whom there is no and cannot be justification.

Referring directly to the episode of Andriy's meeting with the Polish woman, the teacher speaks of the incomparable impression that the Polish woman made on him, literally blinding the young man with her sparkling beauty. Andriy passionately loves her, full of reverent delight. We ask readers: Is it bad? No, there is nothing wrong with Andriy's feeling itself. On the contrary, the ability for a great and strong feeling adorns Andriy. And if we compare the attitude towards women Andriy and the Cossacks,. the comparison will be in his favor. If for the Cossacks a woman is a slave, then for Andriy she is the queen of his soul, whom he is ready to serve with delight. Doesn't he turn himself into a slave of his passion? It should be noted in a conversation with students that the beautiful Polish woman herself is not guilty of anything, that she appears in the story in a romantic halo of perfect female beauty. In the scene of the decisive explanation with Andriy, her image is fanned with lyricism, her words flow like music: “She threw away her handkerchief, pulled back her long hair that had fallen over her eyes, and spilled all over in pitiful speeches, pronouncing them in a quiet, quiet voice: “Don’t Am I worthy of eternal complaints? Is not the mother who gave birth to me unhappy? Was it not a bitter fate for me? Are you not my fierce executioner, my ferocious fate? Andriy, in the first minutes of the meeting, could not find words to adequately answer the lady to the expression of her gratitude and "was indignant at his Cossack nature." This is a remark that should be paid attention to, since it indicates that Andriy, who used to dream of becoming a Cossack, is now looking for a different measure of values for himself and is ashamed of being a Cossack. When he saw in the eyes of the Polish woman more than gratitude, he completely lost his head and was ready for anything. This is evidenced by the words of Andriy, addressed to the Pole: “What do you need? What do you want? Command me! Give me the most impossible service in the world - I will run to fulfill it! Tell me to do what no man can do - I will do it, I will destroy myself. I'll lose, I'll lose." Everyone often notices for themselves that it is the Pole who reminds Andrsho, what is his duty and covenant, ”reminds that Andria is called “father, comrades, fatherland”, and the Poles and she are their enemies. What is Andriy's answer? Of course, this is already the reprimand of a traitor: “And what about my father, comrades, fatherland? .. So if so, then this is what: I don’t have anyone! No one, no one!.. Who said that my homeland is Ukraine? Who gave it to me in the homeland? The fatherland is what our soul seeks, which is sweeter for it than anything. My motherland is you! Here is my homeland! And I will carry the homeland that is in my heart, I will carry it until it becomes my age, and I will see if one of the Cossacks will tear it out of there! And everything that is, I will sell, give, ruin for such a homeland! The teacher will draw the attention of readers to the fact that Andriy openly affirms those moral principles that determine his behavior. For him, only personal desires and aspirations matter (“Fatherland is what our soul is looking for, which is sweeter for it than anything”). The impetuousness of affirming these principles is manifested in Andrii's speech, which corresponds to his character and the given situation. Andriy is completely in the power of the excitement that has seized him, in the power of the feeling that has flared up in him; he is pathetic in his confession. His speech “replete with exclamatory intonations, synonyms collide in it: “I will sell, I will give, I will destroy”; there are forcing phrases-repetitions: “I will carry it in my heart”, “I will carry it until it becomes my age”, “we will see if one of the Kozaks vomits ...”, etc. How does the author feel about what happened? How do we feel? In response to the questions posed, the teacher will read a lyrical digression full of bitter regret: “And the Cossack died! Lost for the entire Cossack chivalry! He will never see Zaporozhye again, nor his father's farms, nor God's church! Ukraine will also not see the bravest of its children who undertook to defend it. Old Taras will tear out a gray tuft of hair from his chuprina and curse both the day and the hour in which he gave birth to such a son to shame. When reading, it is necessary to convey to the readers the high emotional mood of this lyrical digression, in which the bitterness of the loss of the bravest of the Cossacks and the tragedy of Andriy's betrayal found such an exhaustive expression in its completeness. From now on, Andriy will forever and irrevocably be expelled from the ranks of the Cossacks, he is no longer a Cossack. He is rejected by the Motherland. He will be cursed by his father, by his comrades. It seems to us that just now the moment has come for a big and serious conversation about what kind of person Andriy is. Why did he, the bravest of the Cossack chivalry, not become his glory and pride? It also becomes clear what moral and aesthetic principles he is a representative of and what our attitude towards these principles is. What moral lesson should be drawn from the dramatic situation in which life has plunged Andria? In order to fully answer these questions, we have previously traced the process of formation of Andriy's personality, found out the features of his nature and character. What exactly was revealed? It turns out that Andriy believes that he is a free person, that he is free to dispose of himself as he wants, to do as he sees fit. He considers only his desires to be the law for himself. He does not want to give an account to anyone of his aspirations and inclinations. These principles are his moral guide. Young, ardent, he surrendered without hesitation and without hesitation to the desire of his heart. Didn't he have a right to? - may object to us. And doesn’t the passion for the Pole inspire Andrii, enrich his spiritual world, give him the power of captivating charm? But after all, a person lives in society, and society has the right to demand from the individual the same thing that she demands from society: respect, understanding of the interests of society. The individual and society are inextricably linked. And only when the general and the personal are in an organic combination - only then, says Belinsky, is life full of deep and reasonable content - both personal and general. If they do not coincide, are in irreconcilable contradiction, then a collision is inevitable, and then an individual person is either a winner or a loser. In full accordance with this statement, the nature of Andriy's feelings for the Pole is also considered. In Evenings on a Farm near Dikapkp, love is a big, beautiful feeling. It ennobles a person, reveals his best qualities (Vakula, Levko). Love, which owns Andrn, did not include it in the wide world. On the contrary, it shielded both the world and people from him. Disregarding nothing but his feelings, Andriy freed himself from responsibility to his comrades. And this led Andrii to the loss of honor ", and love, bringing dishonor to a person, is criminal. The author leads the reader to such an idea. The conversation about how Andriy came to betrayal ends with reading out the words that he spoke to the innkeeper Yankel: "Tell your father, tell your brother, tell the Cossacks, tell the Cossacks tell everyone that my father is no longer my father, my brother is not my brother, my comrade is not my comrade, and that I will fight with them all.” This is already being said by a conscious enemy, for whom there is no and cannot be justification.

In the scene of the decisive explanation with Andriy, her image is fanned with lyricism, her words flow like music: “She threw away her handkerchief, pulled back her long hair that had fallen over her eyes, and spilled all over in pitiful speeches, pronouncing them in a quiet, quiet voice: “Don’t Am I worthy of eternal complaints? Is not the mother who gave birth to me unhappy? Was it not a bitter fate for me? Are you not my fierce executioner, my ferocious fate?

The teacher will draw the attention of readers to the fact that Andriy openly affirms those moral principles that determine his behavior. For him, only personal desires and aspirations matter (“Fatherland is what our soul is looking for, which is sweeter for it than anything”). The impetuousness of affirming these principles is manifested in Andrii's speech, which corresponds to his character and the given situation. Andriy is completely in the power of the excitement that has seized him, in the power of the feeling that has flared up in him; he is pathetic in his confession. His speech “replete with exclamatory intonations, synonyms collide in it: “I will sell, I will give, I will destroy”; there are forcing phrases-repetitions: “I’ll carry it in my heart”, “I’ll carry it until it becomes my century”, “We’ll see if one of the Kozaks will vomit ...”, etc.
How does the author feel about what happened? How do we feel? In response to the questions posed, the teacher will read a lyrical digression full of bitter regret: “And the Cossack died! Lost for the entire Cossack chivalry! He will never see Zaporozhye again, nor his father's farms, nor God's church! Ukraine will also not see the bravest of its children who undertook to defend it. Old Taras will tear out a gray tuft of hair from his chuprina and curse both the day and the hour in which he gave birth to such a son to shame.

When reading, it is necessary to convey to the readers the high emotional mood of this lyrical digression, in which the bitterness of the loss of the bravest of the Cossacks and the tragedy of Andriy's betrayal found such an exhaustive expression in its completeness. From now on, Andriy will forever and irrevocably be expelled from the ranks of the Cossacks, he is no longer a Cossack. He is rejected by the Motherland. He will be cursed by his father, by his comrades.

It seems to us that just now the moment has come for a big and serious conversation about what kind of person Andriy is. Why did he, the bravest of the Cossack chivalry, not become his glory and pride? It also becomes clear what moral and aesthetic principles he is a representative of and what our attitude towards these principles is. What moral lesson should be drawn from the dramatic situation in which life has plunged Andria? In order to fully answer these questions, we have previously traced the process of formation of Andriy's personality, found out the features of his nature and character.

What exactly was revealed? It turns out that Andriy believes that he is a free person, that he is free to dispose of himself as he wants, to do as he sees fit. He considers only his desires to be the law for himself. He does not want to give an account to anyone of his aspirations and inclinations. These principles are his moral guide. Young, ardent, he surrendered without hesitation and without hesitation to the desire of his heart. Didn't he have a right to? - may object to us. And doesn’t the passion for the Pole inspire Andrii, enrich his spiritual world, give him the power of captivating charm?

But after all, a person lives in society, and society has the right to demand from the individual the same thing that she demands from society: respect, understanding of the interests of society. The individual and society are inextricably linked. And only when the general and the personal are in an organic combination - only then, says Belinsky, is life full of deep and reasonable content - both personal and general. If they do not coincide, are in irreconcilable contradiction, then a collision is inevitable, and then an individual person is either a winner or a loser.

In the story "Taras Bulba" N. V. Gogol describes the life of the Zaporizhzhya Cossacks, their struggle for freedom and independence.

One of the main themes of the work is the theme of loyalty and betrayal. Among the Cossacks love for native land, fidelity to military duty, a sense of camaraderie were revered as the most important qualities.

On the eve of a difficult battle, the chief ataman Taras Bulba tells the Cossacks: "There are no ties holier than camaraderie." He carries fidelity to this feeling through all battles and trials. In the battle near Dubno, he hurried to the rescue of his comrades more than once. In the last minutes of his life, he thinks not about the torments that he will have to endure at the stake, but about how the Cossacks can be saved. “The fire was already rising above the fire, capturing his legs,” and the eyes of the old colonel flashed with joy, because he saw: the Cossacks were already on the Dniester, “bullets rained down on them from above, but did not reach them.”

The eldest son of Taras Bulba Ostap is faithful to his military duty. He is a brave warrior who has "to measure out all danger and all states of affairs." But in a difficult battle, "they grappled with Ostap almost eight times" and took him prisoner. TO place of execution the captured Cossacks, among whom was Ostap, "went not timidly, not sullenly, with a kind of quiet pride." Faith in the justice of their cause, for which they gave their lives, gave the Cossacks strength, helped endure the agony of execution. Ostap appealed to his comrades with an appeal: “God grant that all heretics, whatever heretics are, do not hear, the wicked, how a Christian is tormented!”

Loyalty to the native land sounds in the words of the bleeding Kukubenko: “Let them live even better after us than we do, and let the Russian land forever loved by Christ flaunt!

Selflessly loving their homeland, the Cossacks despised the traitors. And how painful it was for Taras when his youngest son turned out to be a traitor! Andriy was a brave warrior. Observing what miracles Andriy performed with his one furious onslaught, old Taras marveled and said: “And this is good - the enemy would not have taken him! - warrior! Not Ostap, but a kind, kind warrior as well. But young Bulba was most attracted to the battle itself, and not to the goal for which it was fought. In battle, he heard "the charming music of bullets and swords", rushing like "drunk, in the whistle of bullets, in saber brilliance and in his own heat." That is why, when a beautiful Polish woman asked Andria for help, he betrayed his comrades and went over to the side of the enemy. For Taras, this act of his son was a heavy grief. The old colonel cannot forgive betrayal to anyone and kills Andriy, saying at the same time: “I gave birth to you, I will kill you!”

Love for their native land, loyalty to their people, a sense of camaraderie make the Cossacks invincible. N.V. Gogol expressed his admiration for the Cossacks in the following words: “Is there really such fires, torments and such a force in the world that would overpower the Russian force!”

Popular in category: