Who is this proshmandovka. "proshmandovka"

Polina is a creative and decisive person, who always knows how it should be, besides, she is “ beautiful woman with the past”, Volodya liked such things. But Polina scared me a little with some whirlwind, so to speak. And now everything has already been determined:
- when we get married, we will be - you are in Moscow, I am in Nizhny. Once every two weeks you will come for the weekend, and once every other two weeks I will.
- you know, Pauline, I have a mother. She doesn't like it when someone sleeps here. Here your Gorky Zina and Klava spent the night, for a long time I explained to her that they were not homeless, but simply from Nizhny Novgorod, but the mother remained with her "nowhere to spend the night, so the homeless."
- your mother is absolutely right (yes, you can’t knock Polina down). Who are Zina and Klava? - proshmandovki. I'm a completely different matter - a respectable Jewish woman, my mother will like it.

PROSHMANDOVKA ... How long has he not heard this word. Then no one called Volodya either. He was just Vovka Sudakov from the six-room communal apartment No. 8 on the second floor. In the summer, neighboring peers were shoved by their parents into villages and pioneer camps, but Vovka was not shoved anywhere and he enriched himself by watching the “adult” communal life.
In the kitchen, Irka screamed heart-rendingly and rushed towards her room. It was necessary to overcome four neighboring doors, hers was only the fifth from the kitchen. Behind Irka, along a long corridor with a cast-iron meat grinder in a waved hand, stomping like an elephant, Bab-Tanya was moving and shouting: “Prosh-mandovka!”. Irka was stealing cutlets again, Vovka realized. The meat grinder hit Irka's slamming door, severely injuring its surface. Bab-Tanya looked at her tool with surprise, realizing that in a hurry she grabbed a clearly more serious kitchen tool than she should have. “I almost brought it to sin, proshmandovka,” the overweight old woman muttered, returning to her saucepan world.
In the entire vast kingdom of Vovkin's children, there was only one person who did not drive his inquisitive mind away from himself - neighbor Ivanych. Ivanych knew everything and willingly shared his knowledge. And now Vovka darted into the neighbor's door
- Ivanych, what is a "proshmandovka"?
- this is the one who swears, and then slips away, hides in a corner and shits liquidly.
What is a "mandite"? - Vovka did not let up
- how old are you?
- six and a half.
- in six months I’ll say, help better - Ivanovich was a one-armed invalid and Vovka was often his second hand. Maybe that's why Ivanovich did not drive the boy away from him, or maybe because he had no sons, only numerous daughters. For this, the peasants teased Ivanych as a "ladies' cutter."
In the evening, when asked by his mother how things were going, Vovka said that everything was in order, only aunt Ira again "mandila and slipped away." The mother burst out laughing, but quickly pulled herself together and serious look, forbidding her son to utter such words anywhere, she went to suggest to her neighbors. And the neighbors were afraid of Vovkin's mother.

Finally found the word!

This is a very successful and completely adequate translation by Yuri Vyazemsky of the name Pussy Riot. I do not see anything indecent and abusive in this translation. A good, suitable literary analogue of what they themselves came up with.

First, this translation reflects their own aspirations.
After all, they tried to omit the sublime, namely, the faith of other people.
But at the same time they themselves called themselves mysteriously foreign, so that many naive people would get confused in the meaning of this name, and would be embarrassed to pronounce it. Mysterious and provocative at the same time. Typically feminine.
Now there is an adequate Russian translation, which very accurately reflects the essence of the group's name, which means it deprives it of cultural significance. Thus, this translation reduces the group from the level of "art" to the level of banal rudeness.
The vector changed direction and returned to them.

Secondly, this word is common, that is, close and familiar to ordinary people, on whose faith, in fact, swindlers encroached.

Thirdly, this translation was voiced by a cultured and authoritative person, writer, philosopher, TV presenter, candidate of historical sciences, professor, head of the Department of World Literature and Culture of the Faculty of International Journalism. In addition, the person is emphatically a believer. A conscious believer.

Actually, this was the most important thing in Mamontov's program.

The rest, including details of filming, all these details from video surveillance cameras and diligently emotional discussion in the studio, are just an addition to the main thing. To the opportunity, finally, to call a thing (that is, a group) by its own name.

In interviews, the girls spoke of the group only in the third person, as an outside independent thing. Now the title has been translated and linked to them.

All that remains for society is to separate sin from individuals.

Saved

Finally found the word! This is a very successful and completely adequate translation by Yuri Vyazemsky of the name Pussy Riot. I do not see anything indecent and abusive in this translation. A good, suitable literary analogue of the fact that they themselves ...

1. Independent parts of speech:

• nouns (see morphological norms of nouns);
• Verbs:
• • sacraments;
  • gerunds;
• adjectives;
• numerals;
• pronouns;
• adverbs;

2. Service parts of speech:

• prepositions;
• unions;
• particles;

3. Interjections.

None of the classifications (according to the morphological system) of the Russian language fall into:

• the words yes and no, if they act as an independent sentence.
• introductory words: so, by the way, total, as a separate sentence, as well as a number of other words.

Morphological analysis of a noun

• initial form in nominative case, singular (with the exception of nouns used only in the plural: scissors, etc.);
• own or common noun;
• animate or inanimate;
• gender (m, f, cf.);
• number (unit, plural);
• declination;
• case;
• syntactic role in a sentence.

Plan of morphological analysis of a noun

"The baby is drinking milk."

Kid (answers the question who?) - noun;

• initial form - baby;
• constant morphological features: animated, common noun, concrete, male, I-th declension;
• inconstant morphological features: nominative case, singular;
• at parsing The sentence plays the role of the subject.

Morphological analysis of the word "milk" (answers the question of whom? What?).

• initial form - milk;
• constant morphological characteristic of the word: neuter, inanimate, real, common noun, 2nd declension;
• variable morphological features: accusative, singular;
• in a sentence with a direct object.

Here is another example of how to make a morphological analysis of a noun, based on a literary source:

"Two ladies ran up to Luzhin and helped him get up. He began to knock the dust off his coat with his palm. (Example from: Luzhin's Defense, Vladimir Nabokov)."

Ladies (who?) - noun;

• the initial form is a lady;
• permanent morphological features: common noun, animate, specific, feminine, 1st declension;
• fickle morphological noun characteristic: singular, genitive;
• syntactic role: part of the subject.

Luzhin (to whom?) - noun;

• initial form - Luzhin;
• faithful morphological characteristic of the word: proper name, animated, concrete, masculine, mixed declension;
• non-permanent morphological features of a noun: singular, dative case;

Palm (what?) - noun;

• initial form - palm;
• constant morphological features: feminine, inanimate, common noun, concrete, I declension;
• unstable morphos. signs: singular, instrumental;
• syntactic role in context: complement.

Dust (what?) - noun;

• initial form - dust;
• main morphological features: common noun, real, feminine, singular, animate not characterized, III declension (noun with zero ending);
• fickle morphological word characteristic: accusative;
• syntactic role: complement.

(c) Coat (Why?) - noun;

• the initial form is a coat;
• constant correct morphological characteristic of the word: inanimate, common noun, concrete, neuter, indeclinable;
• morphological features are unstable: the number cannot be determined from the context, the genitive case;
• syntactic role as a member of a sentence: addition.

Morphological analysis of the adjective

The adjective is a significant part of speech. Answers questions What? Which? Which? Which? and characterizes the features or qualities of an object. Table of morphological features of the adjective name:

• initial form in the nominative case, singular, masculine;
• constant morphological features of adjectives:
• • rank, according to the value:
  • • - quality (warm, silent);
    • - relative (yesterday, reading);
    • - possessive (hare, mother's);
  • degree of comparison (for qualitative, in which this feature is constant);
  • full / short form(for quality, in which this feature is permanent);
• non-permanent morphological features of the adjective:
• • quality adjectives change according to the degree of comparison (in comparative degrees, a simple form, in superlatives - complex): beautiful-beautiful-most beautiful;
  • full or short form (only qualitative adjectives);
  • genus sign (only in the singular);
  • number (consistent with the noun);
  • case (consistent with the noun);
• syntactic role in the sentence: the adjective is a definition or part of a compound nominal predicate.

Plan of morphological analysis of the adjective

Suggestion example:

The full moon rose over the city.

Full (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - complete;
• permanent morphological features of the adjective: qualitative, full form;
• inconstant morphological characteristic: in a positive (zero) degree of comparison, feminine (consistent with the noun), nominative case;
• parsing - minor member sentences, acts as a definition.

Here is another whole literary passage and a morphological analysis of the adjective, using examples:

The girl was beautiful: slender, thin, blue eyes, like two amazing sapphires, looked into your soul.

Beautiful (what?) - adjective;

• the initial form is beautiful (in this sense);
• constant morphological norms: qualitative, short;
• non-permanent signs: positive degree of comparison, singular, feminine;

Slender (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - slender;
• permanent morphological features: qualitative, complete;
• inconstant morphological characteristics of the word: full, positive degree of comparison, singular, feminine, nominative;
• syntactic role in the sentence: part of the predicate.

Thin (what?) - adjective;

• the initial form is thin;
• morphological permanent features: qualitative, complete;
• inconstant morphological characteristic of the adjective: positive degree of comparison, singular, feminine, nominative;
• syntactic role: part of the predicate.

Blue (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - blue;
• table of constant morphological features of the adjective: qualitative;
• inconsistent morphological characteristics: complete, positive degree of comparison, plural, nominative;
• syntactic role: definition.

Amazing (what?) - adjective;

• initial form - amazing;
• permanent signs in morphology: relative, expressive;
• inconsistent morphological features: plural, genitive;
• syntactic role in the sentence: part of the circumstance.

Morphological features of the verb

According to the morphology of the Russian language, the verb is an independent part of speech. It can denote an action (to walk), a property (to limp), an attitude (to equal), a state (to rejoice), a sign (to turn white, show off) of an object. Verbs answer the question what to do? what to do? what is he doing? what did you do? or what will it do? To different groups verbal word forms are characterized by heterogeneous morphological characteristics and grammatical features.

Morphological forms of verbs:

• the initial form of the verb is the infinitive. It is also called the indefinite or invariable form of the verb. Variable morphological features are absent;
• conjugated (personal and impersonal) forms;
• non-conjugated forms: participles and participles.

Morphological analysis of the verb

• the initial form is the infinitive;
• constant morphological features of the verb:
• • transitivity:
  • • transitive (used with accusative nouns without a preposition);
    • intransitive (not used with a noun in the accusative case without a preposition);
  • returnability:
  • • returnable (there are -sya, -sya);
    • irrevocable (no -sya, -sya);
  • • imperfect (what to do?);
    • perfect (what to do?);
  • conjugation:
  • • I conjugation (do-eat, do-et, do-eat, do-et, do-yut / ut);
    • II conjugation (sto-ish, sto-it, sto-im, sto-ite, sto-yat / at);
    • conjugated verbs (want, run);
• non-permanent morphological features of the verb:
• • mood:
  • • indicative: what did you do? What did you do? what is he doing? what will he do?;
    • conditional: what would you do? what would you do?;
    • imperative: do it!;
  • time (in the indicative mood: past / present / future);
  • person (in the present/future tense, indicative and imperative: 1st person: I/we, 2nd person: you/you, 3rd person: he/they);
  • gender (in the past tense, singular, indicative and conditional);
  • number;
• syntactic role in a sentence. The infinitive can be any part of the sentence:
• • predicate: To be a holiday today;
  • Subject: Learning is always useful;
  • addition: All the guests asked her to dance;
  • definition: He has an overwhelming desire to eat;
  • circumstance: I went out for a walk.

Morphological analysis of the verb example

To understand the scheme, we will conduct a written analysis of the morphology of the verb using the example of a sentence:

Crow somehow God sent a piece of cheese ... (fable, I. Krylov)

Sent (what did you do?) - part of speech verb;

• initial form - send;
• permanent morphological features: perfective, transitional, 1st conjugation;
• inconstant morphological characteristic of the verb: indicative mood, past tense, masculine, singular;

Next online sample morphological analysis verb in a sentence:

What silence, listen.

Listen (what to do?) - verb;

• the initial form is to listen;
• morphological constant features: perfect form, intransitive, reflexive, 1st conjugation;
• inconstant morphological characteristics of the word: imperative, plural, 2nd person;
• syntactic role in the sentence: predicate.

Plan for the morphological analysis of the verb online for free, based on an example from a whole paragraph:

He needs to be warned.

No need, let him know another time how to break the rules.

What are the rules?

Wait, I'll tell you later. Has entered! (“The Golden Calf”, I. Ilf)

Warn (what to do?) - verb;

• initial form - warn;
• morphological features of the verb are constant: perfective, transitive, irrevocable, 1st conjugation;
• non-permanent morphology of the part of speech: infinitive;
• syntactic function in a sentence: component predicate.

Let him know (what is he doing?) - part of speech verb;

• the initial form is to know;
• inconstant morphology of the verb: imperative, singular, 3rd person;
• syntactic role in the sentence: predicate.

Violate (what to do?) - the word is a verb;

• the initial form is to violate;
• permanent morphological features: imperfective, irrevocable, transitional, 1st conjugation;
• non-permanent signs of the verb: infinitive (initial form);
• syntactic role in the context: part of the predicate.

Wait (what to do?) - part of speech verb;

• initial form - wait;
• permanent morphological features: perfect form, irrevocable, transitional, 1st conjugation;
• inconstant morphological characteristic of the verb: imperative mood, plural, 2nd person;
• syntactic role in the sentence: predicate.

Entered (what did?) - verb;

• initial form - enter;
• permanent morphological features: perfective, irrevocable, intransitive, 1st conjugation;
• inconstant morphological characteristic of the verb: past tense, indicative mood, singular, masculine;
• syntactic role in the sentence: predicate.