The theme of betrayal in the work is the fate of man. Composition "The problem of moral choice in Sholokhov's story" The fate of man
Mikhail Alexandrovich Sholokhov wrote the work "The Fate of Man" in 1956. It, in fact, is a summary of the story that the writer heard at the front. This is the first story in which the problem of soldiers who were captured by the German occupiers is deeply touched upon. In short, this story tells about human sorrows, losses and, at the same time, hope for another life, faith in man. In this article, we will look at brief analysis"The fate of man" Sholokhov.
The main character of the story
The plot of the story and main topic built like a confession. The main character's name is Andrei Sokolov, he is a simple hard worker who worked on a collective farm before the war. Sokolov's life is calm and measured, he feeds his family and lives like many others. But everything is changing dramatically, because the Nazis are attacking.
Everyone at that time considers it his duty to go to the front to protect native land from the aggressor, Andrey Sokolov is no exception. During the analysis of The Fate of a Man, it becomes clear that Sholokhov does not want to present Sokolov to readers as a hero and elevate him to some special status. However, his example is an opportunity to show what is happening in the soul of all Russian people, the life of the protagonist is the fate of the people. Sholokhov tries to evoke in the reader a sense of pride in the courage, endurance and willpower that were shown during the difficult times of the war.
Characteristics of Andrei Sokolov
It is impossible to make an analysis of the story "The Fate of a Man" by Sholokhov without characterizing the protagonist. Following Sokolov's story, we notice words that convey notes of a real Russian character. There are many proverbs in his speech. Although Andrei is not very literate, because he is a simple worker, and often there are simple or incorrect speech turns in his expressions, this is not the main thing.
In the description of Andrei Sokolov, it is clear that he a real man he loves his family. Sholokhov depicts his main character in all colors, because you can read how he - a simple soldier - felt the brunt of wartime, you can also learn about how he visited German captivity. Much happened in Sokolov's fate: he met with betrayal and cowardice, soldierly friendship and unanimity. Sokolov even had to commit murder. It was during the captivity, when the captured soldier was going to betray the commander, giving him to the Germans. Then there was an acquaintance with the doctor. He was also captured, but showed unprecedented courage and human sympathy.
conclusions
To make an accurate analysis of the story "The Fate of a Man" by Sholokhov, we recommend that you definitely read this work, at least its summary. Of course, it seems that the events that took place in the fate of Andrei Sokolov, whose description you could read above, are not special and it is difficult to call his actions feats. But after all, this was Sholokhov's idea.
Yes, main character received several minor wounds and did what many did at that time, but the episodes of Sokolov's life clearly show how courage, willpower, pride, love for one's country and other outstanding qualities manifested themselves. And this is a feat, something that everyone is obliged to do - to go through everything, remain a person, live on and work for the benefit of others. In the characterization of Andrei Sokolov, this manifested itself.
PROBLEMS OF SHOLOHOV'S STORY. The story "The Fate of a Man" was written in 1956. It is based on real case. The story was immediately noticed, received many critical and reader responses. The writer ventured on a forbidden topic: a Russian man in captivity. Forgive it or accept it? Some wrote about the "rehabilitation" of the prisoners, others saw a lie in the story.
The story is built in the form of a confession. The fate of Andrei Sokolov before the war is quite typical. Work, family. Sokolov - builder, man peaceful profession. The war crosses out the life of Sokolov, as well as the life of the whole country. A person becomes one of the fighters, one part of the army. At the first moment, Sokolov almost dissolves in the general mass, and then Sokolov recalls this temporary retreat from the human with the most acute pain. The whole war for the hero, the whole path of humiliation, trials, camps - this is a struggle between the human in a person and the inhuman machine that a person faces.
The camp for Sokolov is a test of human dignity. There, for the first time, he kills a man, not a German, but a Russian, with the words: “But what kind of a man is he?” This is a test of the loss of "one's own". An attempt to escape is unsuccessful, since in this way it is impossible to escape from the power of the machine. The climax of the story is the scene in the curfew. Sokolov behaves defiantly, like a man for whom the highest good is death. And the strength of the human spirit wins. Sokolov remains alive. After that, another test that Sokolov endures: without betraying a Russian soldier as a commandant, he does not lose dignity in front of his comrades. "How are we going to share grub?" - asks my bunk neighbor, and his voice trembles. “Equally for everyone,” I tell him. Waited for dawn. Bread and lard were cut with a harsh thread. Everyone got a piece of bread the size of a matchbox, each crumb was taken into account, well, and fat, you know, just anoint your lips. However, they shared without resentment.
After escaping, Andrei Sokolov does not end up in a camp, but in a rifle unit. And here is another test - the news of the death of Irina's wife and daughters. And on the ninth of May, Victory Day, Sokolov loses his son, and the most fate gives him is to see his dead son before burying him in a foreign land.
And yet, Sokolov (according to Sholokhov's idea, a person must preserve the human in himself, in spite of any trials) behaves this way.
In the very first post-war year, Andrei Sokolov returns to a peaceful profession and accidentally meets little boy Vanya. The hero of the story has a goal, a person appears for whom life is worth living. Yes, and Vanya reaches out to Sokolov, finds a father in him. So Sholokhov introduces the theme of the renewal of man after the war.
In 1942, Sholokhov wrote the story "The Science of Hatred" - about the great hatred of peaceful Soviet people to the war, to the fascists, “for everything that they caused to the motherland”, and at the same time - about great love to the motherland, to the people, which is kept in the hearts of the soldiers. The main ideas of this story were developed in the story "The Fate of a Man", where Sholokhov shows the beauty of the soul and the strength of the character of a Russian person.
PROBLEMS OF SHOLOHOV'S STORY. The story "The Fate of a Man" was written in 1956. It is based on a real case. The story was immediately noticed, received many critical and reader responses. The writer ventured on a forbidden topic: a Russian man in captivity. Forgive it or accept it? Some wrote about the "rehabilitation" of the prisoners, others saw a lie in the story.
The story is built in the form of a confession. The fate of Andrei Sokolov before the war is quite typical. Work, family. Sokolov is a builder, a man of a peaceful profession. The war crosses out the life of Sokolov, as well as the life of the whole country. A person becomes one of the fighters, one part of the army. At the first moment, Sokolov almost dissolves in the general mass, and then Sokolov recalls this temporary retreat from the human with the most acute pain. The whole war for the hero, the whole path of humiliation, trials, camps - this is a struggle between the human in a person and the inhuman machine that a person faces.
The camp for Sokolov is a test of human dignity. There, for the first time, he kills a man, not a German, but a Russian, with the words: “But what kind of a man is he?” This is a test of the loss of "one's own". An attempt to escape is unsuccessful, since in this way it is impossible to escape from the power of the machine. The climax of the story is the scene in the curfew. Sokolov behaves defiantly, like a man for whom the highest good is death. And the strength of the human spirit wins. Sokolov remains alive. After that, another test that Sokolov endures: without betraying a Russian soldier as a commandant, he does not lose dignity in front of his comrades. "How are we going to share grub?" - asks my bunk neighbor, and his voice trembles. “Equally for everyone,” I tell him. Waited for dawn. Bread and lard were cut with a harsh thread. Everyone got a piece of bread the size of a matchbox, each crumb was taken into account, well, and fat, you know, just anoint your lips. However, they shared without resentment.
After escaping, Andrei Sokolov does not end up in a camp, but in a rifle unit. And here is another test - the news of the death of Irina's wife and daughters. And on the ninth of May, Victory Day, Sokolov loses his son, and the most fate gives him is to see his dead son before burying him in a foreign land.
And yet, Sokolov (according to Sholokhov's idea, a person must preserve the human in himself, in spite of any trials) behaves this way.
In the very first post-war year, Andrei Sokolov returns to a peaceful profession and accidentally meets a little boy, Vanya. The hero of the story has a goal, a person appears for whom life is worth living. Yes, and Vanya reaches out to Sokolov, finds a father in him. So Sholokhov introduces the theme of the renewal of man after the war.
In 1942, Sholokhov wrote the story "The Science of Hatred" - about the great hatred of peaceful Soviet people for the war, for the Nazis, "for everything that they caused to the motherland", and at the same time - about the great love for the motherland, for the people, which is kept in the hearts of soldiers. The main ideas of this story were developed in the story "The Fate of a Man", where Sholokhov shows the beauty of the soul and the strength of the character of a Russian person.
Didn't like the essay?
We have 7 more similar compositions.
The story "The Fate of a Man" was written in 1956. He was immediately noticed, received many critical and reader responses. It is based on a real case. The writer ventured on a forbidden topic: a Russian man in captivity. Forgive it or accept it? Some wrote about the "rehabilitation" of the prisoners, others saw a lie in the story.
The story is built in the form of a confession. The fate of Andrei Sokolov before the war is quite typical. Work, family. Sokolov is a builder, a man of a peaceful profession. The war crosses out the life of Sokolov, as well as the life of the whole country. A person becomes one of the fighters, part of the army. At the first moment, Sokolov almost dissolves in the general mass, and then Sokolov recalls this temporary retreat from the human with the most acute pain. The whole war for the hero, the whole path of humiliation, trials, camps - this is a struggle between a man and an inhuman machine that he faces.
Camp for Sokolov - test for human dignity. There, for the first time, he kills a man, not a German, but a Russian, with the words: "But what is he like?" This is a test of the loss of "one's own". An attempt to escape is unsuccessful, since in this way it is impossible to escape from the power of the machine. The climax of the story is the scene in the curfew. Sokolov behaves defiantly, like a man for whom the highest good is death. And the strength of the human spirit wins. Sokolov remains alive.
After that, fate sends another test that Sokolov endures: without betraying a Russian soldier as a commandant, he does not lose dignity in front of his comrades. "How are we going to share grub?" asks my bunk neighbor, and his voice trembles. "Equally for everyone," I tell him. Waited for dawn. Bread and lard were cut with a harsh thread. Everyone got a piece of bread the size of a matchbox, each crumb was taken into account, but bacon, you know, just anoint your lips. However, they shared without resentment."
After escaping, Andrei Sokolov does not end up in a camp, but in a rifle unit. And here is another test - the news of the death of Irina's wife and daughters. And on the ninth of May, Victory Day, Sokolov loses his son. The greatest thing that fate gives him is to see his dead son before burying him in a foreign land.
And yet Sokolov retains his human dignity, in spite of any trials. This is the idea of Sholokhov.
In the very first post-war year, Andrei Sokolov returns to a peaceful profession and accidentally meets a little boy, Vanya. The hero of the story has a goal, a person appears for whom life is worth living. Yes, and Vanya reaches out to Sokolov, finds a father in him. So Sholokhov introduces the theme of the renewal of man after the war.
In the story "The Fate of a Man", ideas were developed about the great hatred of peaceful Soviet people for the war, for the Nazis "for everything that they caused to the Motherland", and, at the same time, about the great love for the Motherland, for the people, which is kept in the hearts of soldiers. Sholokhov shows the beauty of the soul and the strength of the character of a Russian person.
Problem moral choice man has always been especially significant in Russian literature. Exactly at difficult situations By making this or that moral choice, a person truly reveals his true moral qualities, showing how worthy he is of the title of Man.
The story of M.A. Sholokhov "The Fate of Man" was written in 1956 - at the beginning of the "thaw", a complex, transitional historical period. It is dedicated to the recent events of the Great Patriotic War And post-war years and is a story
A simple man, driver Andrey Sokolov, about his life. In this simple story, typical story thousand people: in his youth he worked as a laborer, fought in the Civil War, worked at a factory, started a family, built a house. The war crossed out all his peaceful happiness: his family died, his eldest son, an officer, was killed. All this is usual for that time, as usual, and that, like thousands of other people, for Andrei Sokolov in this situation there was the only possible moral choice: to courageously defend his homeland. “That’s why you are a man, that’s why you’re a soldier, in order to endure everything, to demolish everything, if the need called for this,” he says to his interlocutor. When it is necessary to bring shells to the artillerymen and the commander asks Sokolov if he will slip through, for Andrey there can be no doubt about this: "I must slip through, and that's it!" He is not accustomed to thinking about himself, he thinks first of all about his perishing comrades. But shell shock and captivity put him in completely new, unusual conditions for him. He is ready for death, and it is more important for him not to lose his dignity, to remain a person faithful to the moral law of his own conscience. It is not easy for him to decide to kill a traitor who is ready to betray his commander. But he cannot live according to the principle “his shirt is closer to the body”, and in order to save the thin boy commander, Sokolov strangled the traitor with his own hands. He is experiencing this event: “For the first time in his life he killed, and then his own ... But what is he like his own? He's worse than someone else's, a traitor." The situation of moral choice is resolved by the hero according to the laws socialist realism: by the death of a traitor to prevent the death of many honest people.
The main moral choice of the hero in captivity was the same: not to collude with enemies, not to betray his comrades for a piece of bread, to bravely endure torture and humiliation. Someone less tenacious in spirit denounced Andrei for a carelessly spoken phrase, and, summoned to the commandant of the camp, Sokolov prepares to fearlessly accept death, “so that the enemies do not see at my last minute that it’s still difficult for me to part with life ...”. Refusing to drink "to the victory of the German arms", Andrei Sokolov agrees to drink "to his death and deliverance from torment", proudly refusing snacks. It was important for him to show that “although I’m dying of hunger, I’m not going to choke on their sop, that I have my own, Russian dignity and pride, and that they didn’t turn me into a beast, no matter how hard they tried.” And his dignity was appreciated even by the enemy, who released Sokolov in peace to the barracks and gave him bread and lard. Dividing the "grubs" for everyone is also the moral choice of the hero, who remains true to his concepts of honor, justice, collectivism.
Andrey Sokolov still has a lot to endure - escape from captivity, news of the death of his family, the death of his son - "accurately on the ninth of May, in the morning, on Victory Day." Such blows of fate can break any person who is no less steadfast than Andrei Sokolov. After demobilization, he works as a driver, drinking "one hundred grams from the state" after the flight. But he does not drink too much, he does not complain about his fate - the hero finds the strength to pick up an orphan boy and adopt him. This is also the moral choice of Andrei Sokolov - to find spiritual generosity in himself and take responsibility for the little man, destitute of the war. And the author believes that, a man of strong will, with a kind and courageous heart, Andrey Sokolov will be able to raise a man with the same moral criteria, like him, a man "who, having matured, will be able to endure everything, overcome everything in his path, if his Motherland calls him to this."
