The history of the creation of the "Captain's Daughter". The main characters of "The Captain's Daughter", the genre of the work

Topic 27. REALISM OF A. S. PUSHKIN IN THE STORY "THE CAPTAIN'S DAUGHTER"

The story of A. S. Pushkin " Captain's daughter” is based on real events. Its heroes are historical figures: Pugachev, Catherine II, Khlopusha, Beloborodov, so the "Captain's Daughter" can be calledhistorical work.And at the same time, this story is artistic - fictional characters live and act in it: Grinev, Captain Mironov, his daughter Masha, Shvabrin, Savelich and other persons.

Work on the story began in 1833, when Pushkin went to the Orenburg steppes to collect material on the popular uprising led by Pugachev. There he met with the locals. who were eyewitnesses of many events of the peasant war.

“I have been in Kazan since the fifth... Here I was busy with the old people, contemporaries of my hero; I traveled around the city, examined the battlefields, asked questions, wrote down and was satisfied that I had not visited this side in vain,” Pushkin writes to the nanny about his impressions .

For many years, the name of Emelyan Pugachev was forbidden. And only in the time of Pushkin began to appear historical stories and novels about the Pugachev uprising. The paints in which the national leader was depicted were mostly black. “Villains”, “murderer”, “rebel”, “enemy of the fatherland” - this is how the writers called Pugachev in their works.

In the public consciousness, however, the portrait of Pugachev is depicted in a different way. "Red sun", "sovereign father", "protector" - this is not a complete list of those epithets that the masses endowed their leader with.

In The Captain's Daughter, Pushkin was the first of the writers and historians who saw an outstanding personality in Pugachev. Artistic imagination helped the author to recreate pictures of the distant past. We see how Pugachev acts in various life situations, what he is surrounded by his associates, how his nature manifests itself in relation to enemies. Before the reader is a living person, whose personality causes both sympathy, and anger, and admiration, and bewilderment, and pride, and regret. Pushkin painted Pugachev so complex and contradictory.

The peasant war depicted by Pushkin drew into its whirlpool such people as Grinev, the Mironov family, Zurin, Shvabrin, Savelich, Father Gerasim, and swirled their destinies in the whirlwind of life. These fictional characters help to better understand the character of Pugachev, and against their background, in turn, the pictures of the rebellion look more truthful and vital. Therefore, the reader is especially interested in how the relationship between Grinev and Masha, Grinev and Shvabrin, Grinev and Pugachev will end.

Pushkin sought to reveal and show the totality of the phenomena associated with the uprising of the peasantry. He is bright and true

draws the strengths and weaknesses of a spontaneous peasant uprising, a change in the mood of the peasants, revolting uncontrollably and boldly, and at the first failure returning to obedience.

Pushkin's realism is manifested in the depiction of heroes, their way of life, in contrasting the noble class with the people and Pugachev. The inquisitive mind, sharpness of Pugachev, the absence of servility in him are emphasized.

The story tells about historical events, but the main thing for the author is to show how people behave in an extraordinary situation. It is no coincidence that Pushkin chooses the epigraph for the work of the proverb: "Take care of honor from a young age." Some of the heroes of the story throughout their lives, regardless of the circumstances, follow this motto, and someone is ready to sacrifice ideals and principles in order to save their own lives.

The story is told from the perspective of Petrusha Grinev. From the first chapter we learn about his life before coming to Belogorsk fortress. The upbringing of Grinev was entrusted to the French tutor and serf Savelich. “I lived underage, chasing pigeons and playing leapfrog with the yard boys,” he says about his childhood. Grinev led the life of a young rake, who did not think at all about tomorrow, but the events that happened to him in the Belogorsk fortress made him rethink his way of life, find new values ​​for himself, defend his honor and dignity in real life circumstances.

In the fortress, Grinev meets Alexei Shvabrin, at first glance, a pleasant, educated person. And only further developments show that Shvabrin is the exact opposite of Grinev.

In the Belogorsk fortress, against the backdrop of a peasant uprising, the love story of Grinev and Masha develops. The romantic Grinev falls in love with the daughter of Captain Mironov, writes poetry for her in an album. Realistic and prudent Shvabrin laughs at his friend, hiding that he is not indifferent to this girl. A duel takes place between the heroes, during which Grinev is wounded. But to truly understand the characters of the characters helps tragic events associated with episodes of the uprising, when everyone faces a moral choice: what is more important - honor or dishonor, devotion or betrayal.

In front of Grinev, Captain Mironov and his wife are being executed. They refuse to swear allegiance to Pugachev, considering him an impostor and a thief. Shvabrin, fearing for his own life, goes to serve the rebels. Grinev must also make his choice: swear allegiance to Pugachev and kiss his hand, or go to the gallows after Captain Mironov. Grinev chooses the second, because he cannot become a traitor and violate the commandment: "Take care of honor from a young age." And fate saves him from death. In another episode, when Pugachev invites Petrusha to his feast and again offers to serve in his army, Grinev refuses, defending his ideals and officer honor. And then Pugachev exclaims: "But he is right! He is a man of honor. And it does not matter that he is still young, and most importantly, that he does not value life in a childish way!"

The romantic line of the work develops around the image of Masha Mironova. At the beginning of the story we have a timid girl. A dowry, who only has “a frequent comb, a broom, and a stone of money.” The image of a “prudent and sensitive girl” is revealed gradually. She is capable of deep and sincere love, but her innate nobility does not allow her to give up her principles and agree to marry Grinev without the blessing of her parents. But when the situation in the Belogorsk fortress changes dramatically, Masha's position also changes. She manifests the qualities that until now lived latently in her, finds in herself the strength and determination to save herself and her loved one. From a timid provincial girl, Masha turns into a brave and resourceful heroine, able to defend justice and her right to happiness.

The story is called "The Captain's Daughter". The story of the events is told from the perspective of Grinev. The main place in the work of art is given to Pugachev. So who is the main character after all? Why did Pushkin call the story that way? Could the "Captain's Daughter" have a different ending? The plot of the story evokes such questions and many others from the attentive, thoughtful reader. Russian work in a narrative way ... For the first time, truly Russian characters appeared: a simple commandant of the fortress, a captain, a lieutenant; the fortress itself with a single cannon, the stupidity of time and the simple grandeur of ordinary people - everything is not only the very truth, but even better than it, as it were. (N. V. Gogol)

CAPTAIN'S DAUGHTER(chapters from the story)

Take care of your honor from a young age.

( Proverb)

Chapter IICOUNSELOR

I looked out of the wagon: everything was dark and whirlwind. The wind howled with such fierce expressiveness that it seemed animated; the snow covered me and Savelich; the horses walked at a pace - and soon they stopped. "Why aren't you eating?" I asked the driver impatiently. "What's the point of going? - he answered, getting down from the irradiation, - God knows where they went: there is no road, and darkness is all around. I began to scold him. Savelich stood up for him: an inn, would have eaten tea, would have rested until the morning, the storm would have subsided, we would have gone further. And where are we going? It would be nice to go to the wedding!" Savelyich was right. There was nothing to do. The snow was falling. A snowdrift was rising near the wagon. The horses stood with bowed heads and occasionally trembling. side, hoping to see at least a sign of life or the road, but could not distinguish anything except the muddy whirling of a snowstorm ... Suddenly I saw something black. "Hey, coachman! - I shouted, look: what is blackening there? The coachman began to peer. “But God knows, master,” he said, sitting down in his place, “it’s not a cart, a tree is not a tree, but it seems that it is moving. It must be either a wolf or a man.”

I ordered to go to an unfamiliar object, which immediately began to move towards us. Two minutes later we caught up with the man. "Gay, a kind person! the coachman shouted to him. “Tell me, do you know where the road is?”

-The road is here; I'm standing on a solid strip, - answered the roadman, - but what's the point?

-Listen, little man, - I said to him, - do you know this side? Will you take me to bed for the night?

-The side is familiar to me, - answered the roadman, - thank God, well-worn and traveled up and down. Look what the weather is like: you’ll just go astray. It is better to stop here and wait, perhaps the storm will subside and the sky will clear up: then we will find the way by the stars.

His composure encouraged me. I had already decided, betraying myself to God's will, to spend the night in the middle of the steppe, when suddenly the roadman sat down nimbly on the box and said to the driver: "Well, thank God, they lived not far; turn right and go."

Why should I go to the right? asked the driver with displeasure. Where do you see the road? I suppose, the horses are strangers, the collar is not your own, don’t stop chasing. The coachman seemed right to me. “Indeed,” I said, “why do you think that lived nearby?” - "But because the wind pulled from there, - the roadman answered, - and I hear it smelled of smoke, you know, the village is close." His sharpness and subtlety of instinct amazed me. I ordered the driver to go. I moved, now driving into a snowdrift, now collapsing into a ravine and tumbled first to one side, then to the other. It was like a ship sailing on a stormy sea. Savelich groaned, constantly pushing against my sides. I lowered the mat, wrapped myself in a fur coat and dozed off , lulled by the singing of the storm and the pitching of a quiet ride.

I had a dream that I could never forget, and in which I still see something prophetic when I reflect with it on the strange circumstances of my life. The reader will excuse me: for he probably knows from experience how akin to a person to indulge in superstition, despite all possible contempt for prejudice.

I was in that state of feelings and soul when materiality, yielding to dreams, merges with them in obscure visions of the first dream. It seemed to me that the storm was still raging and we were still wandering through the snowy desert ... Suddenly I saw the gate and drove into the manor yard of our estate. My first thought was the fear that the priest would not be angry with me for involuntarily returning under the roof of my parents and would not consider it a deliberate disobedience. With anxiety, I jumped out of the wagon and saw: mother meets me on the porch with an air of deep chagrin. “Hush,” she says to me, “father is sick, near death, and wants to say goodbye to you.” Struck by fear, I follow her into the bedroom. I see that the room is dimly lit; people with sad faces are standing by the bed. bed; mother raises the curtains and says: “Andrei Petrovich, Petrusha has arrived; he returned when he learned about your illness; bless him." I knelt down and fixed my eyes on the patient. Well?.. Instead of my father, I see a peasant with a black beard lying in bed, looking at me cheerfully. In bewilderment, I turned to my mother, saying to her: "What does this mean? This is not a father. And why should I ask a peasant for a blessing?" “It doesn’t matter, Petrusha,” my mother answered me, “this is your imprisoned father; kiss his hand and let him bless you ...” I did not agree. Then the peasant jumped out of bed, grabbed an ax from behind his back and began I wanted to run... but I couldn't; the room was filled with dead bodies; I stumbled over bodies and slid in bloody puddles... A terrible peasant called me affectionately, saying: "Don't be afraid, come under my blessing.. .”. Horror and bewilderment took possession of me... And at that moment I woke up; the horses were standing; Savelich tugged at my hand, saying: "Come out, sir; you've arrived."

-Where have you arrived? I asked, rubbing my eyes.

-To the inn. The Lord helped, stumbled right on the fence. Come out, sir, and get warm.

I got out of the kibitka. The storm still continued, although with less force. It was so dark that you could poke out your eyes. The owner met us at the gate, holding a lantern under the skirt, and led me into the chamber, which was cramped, but rather clean; the beam illuminated her. A rifle and a tall Cossack hat hung on the wall.

The owner, a Yaik Cossack by birth, seemed to be a peasant of about sixty, still fresh and vigorous. Savelich brought in a cellar after me, demanded a fire to prepare tea, which I never seemed to need so much. The owner went to work.

-Where is the counselor? I asked Savelnch.

"Here, your honor," a voice from above answered me. I looked at the bed and saw a black beard and two sparkling eyes. - "How not to vegetate in one thin coat! There was a sheepskin coat, but what's the sin to hide? I laid the evening at the kisser: the frost seemed not great." At that moment the owner came in with a boiling samovar; I offered our counselor a cup of tea; the peasant got down from the bed. His appearance seemed remarkable to me: he was about forty years old, of medium height, thin and broad-shouldered. There was gray in his black beard; lively large eyes ran about. His face had a rather pleasant, but picaresque expression. His hair was cut in a circle; there was a tattered coat and Tatar trousers. I brought him a cup of tea, he tasted it and frowned. tea is not our Cossack drink.” I gladly granted his wish. The owner took out a damask and a glass from the stave, went up to him and, looking into his face: "Ehe," he said, "again you are in our land! Where did God bring it from?" My guide blinked significantly and answered with a saying: “I flew into the garden, pecked hemp; grandmother threw a pebble - yes by. Well, what about yours?"

Yes, ours! the owner answered, continuing the allegorical conversation. They began to call for vespers, but the priest did not order: the priest was visiting, the devils were in the churchyard. - "Be quiet, uncle," my tramp objected, it will rain, there will be fungi; and if there will be fungi, there will be a body. And now (here he blinked again) plug the ax behind your back: the forester walks. Your honor! To your health! At these words, he took a glass, crossed himself and drank in one gulp. Then he bowed to me and returned to the bed.

I could then understand nothing from this thieves' conversation; but afterwards I guessed that it was about the affairs of the Yaitsky army, at that time just pacified after the 1772 rebellion. Savelnch listened with an air of great displeasure. He glanced suspiciously first at the owner, then at the counselor. The inn, or, in the local language, umet, was on the sidelines, in the steppe, far from any village, and looked very much like a robber's wharf. But there was nothing to be done. It was impossible to think about continuing the path. Savelich's uneasiness amused me greatly. Meanwhile, I settled down to spend the night on a lodging for the night on a bench. Savelich made up his mind to get out on the stove; the owner lay down on the floor. Soon the whole hut was snoring, and I fell asleep like a log.

When I woke up quite late in the morning, I saw that the storm had subsided. The sun was shining. Snow lay in a dazzling shroud on the boundless steppe. The horses were harnessed. I paid off the landlord, who took such a moderate fee from us that even Savelich did not argue with him and did not bargain as usual, and yesterday's suspicions completely vanished from his head. I called the counselor, thanked him for his help, and ordered Savelich to give him half a ruble for vodka. Savelich frowned. “A half for vodka!” he said, “for what is this? For the fact that you deigned to give him a ride to the inn? Your will, sir: we don’t have extra fifty. I could not argue with Savelich. The money, according to my promise, was at his full disposal. I was annoyed, however, that I could not thank the person who helped me out, if not out of trouble, then at least out of a very unpleasant situation. “All right,” I said coolly, “if you don’t want to give half a ruble, then take something out of my dress for him. He is dressed too lightly. Give him my bunny coat."

Have mercy, Father Pyotr Andreevich! Savelich said. - Why does he need your bunny sheepskin coat? He will drink it, dog, in the first tavern.

This, old lady, is no longer your sadness, - said my tramp, -

whether I drink or not. His nobility favors me with a fur coat from his shoulder: it is his master's will, and your serf's business is not to argue and obey.

-You are not afraid of God, robber! Savelich answered him in an angry voice. You see that the child does not yet understand, and you are glad to rob him, for the sake of his simplicity. Why do you need a lord's sheepskin coat? You won't put it on your cursed shoulders.

- Please do not be smart, - I said to my uncle, - now bring

coat here.

-Lord, lord! moaned my Savelich. -The bunny sheepskin coat is almost brand new! And it would be good for someone, otherwise a frantic drunkard!

However, the hare sheepskin coat appeared. The man immediately began to try it on. In fact, the sheepskin coat, from which I also managed to grow, was a little narrow for him. However, he somehow managed to put it on, tearing at the seams. Savelich almost howled when he heard the threads crackle. The tramp was extremely pleased with my gift. He escorted me to the wagon and said with a low bow: “Thank you, your honor! The Lord reward you for your virtue. I will never forget your favors.” I soon forgot about yesterday's blizzard, about my leader and about the hare's sheepskin coat...

1. Under what circumstances did the meeting between Grinev and the counselor take place? Find in the text a description of the appearance of the counselor. What impression did he make on Grinev. Savelich. on you - the readers of the work?

2.Read the episode with a hare coat. How do the participants in this episode feel?

3.Tell us about the second meeting between Grinev and Pugachev. What connection can be traced between the two meetings of the heroes of the story?

4.Who in the eyes of Grinev is Pugachev - a people's leader or a robber?

5.Read the dialogues between Grinev and Pugachev by roles. How does speech help to understand the characters?

6.How did the Beloyursk fortress prepare for a possible attack by Pugachev?

7.Compare the attitude of different people towards Pugachev: commandant, lieutenant Ivan Ignatich. Father Gerasim, Grinev, ordinary Cossacks, etc.

8.Why did Shvabrin end up in the ranks of the rebels? Can he be called a like-minded Pugachev?

9.Compose the story "The Capture of the Belogorsk Fortress" on behalf of different characters in the story.

10.What is the meaning of the love story of Grinev and Masha Mironova in the plot of the work?

I. The story is called "The Captain's Daughter". Who is main character works by Grinev, Masha Mironova, Pugachev? Justify your answer and suggest your own version of the title of the story.

2.Write an essay on one of the topics: Grinev and Pugachev, Grinev and Shvabrin. "Grinev and Masha Mironova". "Pugachev's rebellion through the eyes of Grinev", "Pugachevshchina".

3.Compare the story "The Captain's Daughter" with other works by A. S. Pushkin. What is the realism of Pushkin in the story of the Pugachev uprising?

Introduction By the second half of the 17th century, serfdom had entered its zenith. Following the publication of the Code of 1649, the tendency towards self-liberation of the peasants intensified - their spontaneous and sometimes threatening flight to the outskirts: to the Volga region, Siberia, to the south, to the places of Cossack settlements that arose back in the 16th century and now have become the centers of concentration of the most active sections of the non-free population. The state, which stood guard over the interests of the ruling class of feudal lords, organized mass searches for the fugitives and returned them to their former owners.

In the 50s and 60s of the 17th century bad experiences treasury, the war between Russia and the Commonwealth for the reunification of Ukraine with Russia, exacerbated the brewing discontent. Even shrewd contemporaries clearly saw the essential features of the new. The rebellious age - they gave such an assessment to their time. At the very beginning of this century, the country was shocked by the first Peasant War, which reached its peak in 1606-1607, when Ivan Isaevich Bolotnikov stood at the head of the rebels - peasants, serfs, urban poor.

With great difficulty and considerable effort, the feudal lords suppressed this mass popular movement. However, it was followed by: a speech led by the monastery peasant Balash; unrest in the troops near Smolensk; more than 20 urban uprisings that swept across the country in the middle of the century, starting from Moscow (1648); uprisings in Novgorod and Pskov (1650); copper riot (1662), the scene of which again becomes the capital, and, finally, the Peasant War of Stepan Razin.

The uprising of Emelyan Pugachev (1773-1775) Various sections of the then population of Russia took part in the peasant war led by Pugachev: serfs, Cossacks, various non-Russian nationalities. Here is how Pushkin describes the Orenburg province, in which the events of The Captain's Daughter took place: “This vast and rich province was inhabited by a multitude of semi-savage peoples who had recently recognized the dominion of Russian sovereigns.

Their minute indignations, unaccustomed to the laws and civil life, frivolity and cruelty demanded constant supervision from the government to keep them in obedience. Fortresses were built in places deemed convenient, and mostly inhabited by Cossacks, long-standing owners of the Yaitsky shores. But the Yaik Cossacks, who were supposed to protect the peace and security of this region, for some time were themselves restless and dangerous subjects for the government.

In 1772 there was a riot in their main town. The reason for this was the strict measures taken by Major General Traubenberg in order to bring the army to due obedience. The result was the barbaric murder of Traubenberg, a masterful change in management and, finally, the pacification of the rebellion with buckshot and cruel punishments. Here is the description of Pugachev that Pushkin gives him: “He was about forty, medium height, thin and broad-shouldered. There was gray in his black beard; alive big eyes so they ran.

His face had an expression rather pleasant, but roguish. Her hair was cut in a circle." I must say that a few years before the appearance of Pyotr Fedorovich there were unrest among the Yaik Cossacks. In January 1772, an uprising broke out here. The uprising was brutally suppressed - this was the epilogue to the Pugachev uprising. The Cossacks were waiting for an opportunity to take up arms again. And the opportunity presented itself. On November 22, 1772, Pugachev and his companion arrived in the Yaitsky town and stayed at the house of Denis Stepanovich Pyanov.

There, Pugachev secretly reveals to Pyanov that he is Peter III. Pugachev offers to get away from the oppression of the authorities in the Turkish region. Pyanov talked to good people. We decided to wait until Christmas, when the Cossacks would gather on the bagreni. Then they will accept Pugachev. But Pugachev was captured, he was accused of wanting to take the Yaik Cossacks to the Kuban. Pugachev categorically denied everything. Pugachev was sent to Simbirsk, from there to Kazan, where in January 1773 he was imprisoned.

From where Pugachev, having drunk one soldier and persuading another, fled. In my opinion, the beginning of The Captain's Daughter is connected with that period of Pugachev's life when he returns from prison. At the end of the summer of 1773, Pugachev was already at the house of his friend Obolyaev. Perhaps the innkeeper in The Captain's Daughter is Obolyaev. Here is an excerpt from the story, during the meeting of the innkeeper and Pugachev: you are in our land again! Where did God bring? My counselor blinked significantly and answered with a saying: “I flew into the garden, pecked hemp; grandmother threw a pebble - yes by. Well, what about yours?” - Yes, ours! - answered the owner, continuing the allegorical conversation. - They began, it was to call in the evening, but the priest does not order: the priest is visiting, the devils are in the churchyard. - Be silent, uncle, - my tramp objected, - it will rain, there will be fungi; and there will be fungi, there will be a body. And now (here he blinked again) plug the ax behind your back: the forester walks. Further, Pushkin, on behalf of the protagonist, deciphers this “thieves' speech”: “I could not understand anything then from this thieves' conversation; but later I guessed that it was about the affairs of the Yaitsky army, at that time just pacified after the 1772 riot of the year. The stay of Emelyan Pugachev with Obolyaev and his visit to Pyanov does not remain without consequences.

There were rumors that the sovereign was at Pyanov's house. The authorities sent out great teams to catch the dangerous fugitive, but everything was unsuccessful.

It must be said that, in general, the Cossacks were indifferent to whether the true emperor Pyotr Fedorovich or the Don Cossack, who took his name, appeared before them. It was important that he became a banner in their struggle for their rights and liberties, and who he really is - is it all the same? Here is an excerpt from the conversation between Pugachev and Grinev: “Or do you not believe that I am a great sovereign? Answer directly.

I was embarrassed: I was not able to recognize the tramp as a sovereign: this seemed to me unforgivable cowardice.

To call him a deceiver to his face was to subject oneself to destruction; and what I was ready for under the gallows in the eyes of all the people and in the first ardor of indignation now seemed to me useless boastfulness. I answered Pugachev: “Listen; I will tell you the whole truth. Consider, can I recognize you as a sovereign? You are an intelligent person: you yourself would see that I am cunning. - Who am I according to your understanding? - God knows you; but whoever you are, you're kidding dangerous joke.

Pugachev glanced at me quickly. “So you don’t believe,” he said, “that I was Tsar Pyotr Fedorovich? Well good. Is there no luck to the remote? Didn't Grishka Otrepiev reign in the old days? Think what you want about me, but don't leave me behind. What do you care about anything else? Whoever is a pop is a dad.” Pugachev's courage, his mind, swiftness, resourcefulness and energy won the hearts of all who sought to throw off the oppression of serfdom. That is why the people supported the recent simple Don Cossack, and now Emperor Fyodor Alekseevich.

At the very beginning of the war, during the occupation of the Iletsk town, Pugachev for the first time expressed his opinion regarding the peasants and nobles. He said: “I will take away villages and villages from the boyars, and I will reward them with money. already in the Iletsk town, Pugachev spoke of those very peasant benefits that would attract all the poor rabble to his side, and he never forgot about her.

So far, Pugachev has compensated the nobility with salaries, but the time will come when he will call on the peasantry to catch, execute and hang the nobles. Pugachev started the war very quickly. Within a week, he captured Gnilovsky, Rubizhny, Genvartsovsky and other outposts. He captured the Iletsk town, took Rassypnaya, Nizhne-Ozernaya, Tatishchev, Chernorechenskaya fortresses. The wave of the Peasant War flooded more and more new areas. The war engulfed Yaik and Western Siberia, Prikamye and the Volga region, the Urals and the Zayaitsky steppes.

And the Third Emperor himself put together his Main Army, created the State Military Collegium. Cossack orders were introduced throughout the army, each was considered a Cossack. It can be said that on March 22 the second stage of the Peasants' War began - the beginning of the end of Pugachev's army. On this date, in a battle with the troops of General Golitsin near the Tatishchev fortress, Pugachev was defeated. Prominent associates of Pugachev were captured: Khlopusha, Podurov, Myasnikov, Pochitalin, Tolkachev. Near Ufa he was defeated and captured by Zarubin-Chek. A few days later, Golitsin's troops entered Orenburg.

The battle near the Sakmarsky town on April 1 ended with a new defeat for Pugachev. With a detachment of 500 Cossacks, working people, Bashkirs and Tatars, Pugachev went to the Urals. But Pugachev did not lose heart, as he himself said: “I have people like sand, I know that the mob will gladly accept me.” And he was right. In the battle in the city of Osa, Pugachev was defeated by Michelson's troops.

The third has begun final stage peasant war. “Pugachev fled, but his flight seemed like an invasion.” (A. S. Pushkin) On July 28, Pugachev addressed the people with a manifesto in which he granted all peasants liberty and freedom and always Cossacks, lands and lands, freed them from recruitment duty and called for any taxes and taxes to deal with the nobles, and promised peace and quiet life. This manifesto reflected the peasant ideal - land and freedom. The entire Volga region was swaying with the conflagration of the Peasant War. On August 12, on the Proleika River, Pugachev's troops defeated government troops - this was the last victory of the rebels.

A conspiracy was brewing among the Cossacks. The soul of the conspiracy was Curds, Chumakov, Zheleznov, Fedulyev, Burnov. They did not think at all about common people and "the mob was kept in contempt". Their dreams of becoming the first estate in the state dissipated like smoke. We had to think about our own salvation, and it was possible to do this at the cost of extraditing Pugachev. On September 14, Pugachev was handed over to the authorities.

Knowing the needs and sorrows of all the "poor rabble", Pugachev addressed each of its groups with special slogans and decrees. He favored the Cossacks not only with the Yaik River with all its lands and riches, but also with what the Cossacks needed: bread, gunpowder, lead, money, the “old faith” and Cossack liberties. He promised the Kalmyks, Bashkirs and Kazakhs all their lands and lands, the sovereign's salary, eternal liberty. Turning to the peasants, Pugachev granted them lands and lands, freedom, freed the landowners from power, whom he called on to exterminate, freed them from any duties on attitude towards the state, promised them a free Cossack life.

It seems to me that it was precisely the fact that the rebels did not have a clear goal in front of them that ruined them. The future itself seemed to Pugachev and his associates somehow vague in the form of a Cossack state, where everyone would be Cossacks, where there would be no taxes or recruitment. Where to find the money needed by the state? Pugachev believed that “the treasury can be content with itself”, but how this will happen is unknown.

The place of recruitment will be occupied by “volunteers”, a free trade in salt will be established - “take whoever wants where they want”. Manifestos, decrees and appeals of Pugachev permeate vague dreams of will, labor, equality, justice. Everyone should receive equal “awards”, everyone should be free, everyone is equal, “small and large”, “ordinary and bureaucratic”, “all the poor rabble ”, “both Russians and Gentiles” : “Muhametans and Kalmyks, Kirghiz and Bashkirs, Tatars and Mishars, Cheremis and Saxons settled on the Volga”, everyone should have a “calm life in the world” without any “burdening , general peace.” Peasant War 1773-1775 was the most powerful.

Hundreds of thousands of people took part in it. The territory covered by it stretched from the Voronezh-Tambov region in the West to Shadrinsk and Tyumen in the east, from the Caspian Sea in the south to Nizhny Novgorod and Perm in the north. This peasant war was characterized by more a high degree organization of the rebels.

They copied some of the government bodies of Russia. Under the "emperor" there was a headquarters, a military college with an office. The main army was divided into regiments, communication was maintained, including by sending written orders, reports and other documents. Peasant War 1773-1775 despite its unprecedented scope, it was a chain of independent uprisings limited to a certain area. The peasants rarely left the boundaries of their village, volost, county.

The peasant detachments, and indeed the main army of Pugachev, were much inferior to the government army in terms of armament, training, and discipline. Conclusion What is Peasant Wars? A fair peasant punishment for the oppressors and feudal lords? A civil war in long-suffering Russia, during which Russians killed Russians? Russian rebellion, senseless and merciless? Each time gives its own answers to these questions. Apparently, any violence can give rise to even more cruel and bloody violence.

It is immoral to idealize riots, peasant or Cossack uprisings (which, by the way, they did in our recent past), as well as civil wars, because, generated by lies and covetousness, injustice and an irrepressible thirst for wealth, these uprisings, riots and wars themselves bring violence and injustice, grief and ruin, suffering and rivers of blood. Russian rebellion" is a bit exaggerated.

Why is German or English better? Equally disgusting. Another thing is the nature of the rebellion here in Russia, perhaps a little different: the Russian rebellion is possible as a consequence of the immorality of the authorities. When the authorities are immoral, some adventurers appear, the very top gives them secret loopholes. The murder of Peter III opened the way for numerous false petters, one of whom was Pugachev. Lies, murders, vice that come from above give rise to a thirst for vice in the mass, that is, the mass is deformed.

And in its bowels there is an artistic personality, a leader who undertakes to play someone else's role. And the spectacle in the end is one - violence, blood - the favorite Russian performance. These false leaders always know what the people need: they let off steam by all means at hand, galvanize the most cruel, gloomy, diabolical in people. And everything will end with the same reciprocal hypertrophied cruelty of the state, which does not cease to be immoral, because everything began with it, and, as a rule, ends with it. I think that Pushkin wanted to say: “Look and think about it, even if the government is immoral, the coming rebellion, in any case, is a disaster for the nation.” References 1) Yu. A. Limonov. Emelyan Pugachev and his associates. 2) Pushkin A.S. Captain's daughter. 3) Roznev I. Yaik before the storm. 4) Sakharov A.N. Buganov V.I. History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the 17th century.

What will we do with the received material:

If this material turned out to be useful to you, you can save it to your page on social networks:

In this novel, Pushkin returned to those collisions, to those conflicts that disturbed him in Dubrovsky, but resolved them differently.

Now in the center of the novel is a popular movement, a popular revolt led by a real historical figure - Emelyan Pugachev. In it historical movement by force of circumstances, the nobleman Pyotr Grinev is involved. If in "Dubrovsky" the nobleman becomes the head of the peasant indignation, then in "The Captain's Daughter" the leader of the people's war is a man from the people - the Cossack Pugachev. There is no alliance between the nobles and the rebellious Cossacks, peasants, foreigners, Grinev and Pugachev are social enemies. They are in different camps, but fate brings them together from time to time, and they treat each other with respect and trust. First, Grinev, not allowing Pugachev to freeze in the Orenburg steppes, warmed his soul with a hare sheepskin coat, then Pugachev saved Grinev from execution and helped him in matters of the heart. So, fictional historical figures are placed by Pushkin in a real historical canvas, they became participants in a powerful popular movement and history makers.

Pushkin made extensive use of historical sources, archival documents and visited the places of the Pugachev rebellion, visiting the Trans-Volga region, Kazan, Orenburg, Uralsk. He made his narrative exceptionally reliable by writing documents similar to the real ones and including in them quotations from genuine papers, for example, from Pugachev's appeals, considering them amazing examples of folk eloquence.

A significant role was played in Pushkin's work on The Captain's Daughter and the testimonies of his acquaintances about the Pugachev uprising. Poet I.I. Dmitriev told Pushkin about the execution of Pugachev in Moscow, the fabulist I.A. Krylov - about the war and the besieged Orenburg (his father, a captain, fought on the side of government troops, and he and his mother were in Orenburg), merchant L.F. Krupenikov - about being in Pugachev's captivity. Pushkin heard and wrote down legends, songs, stories from the old-timers of those places through which the uprising swept.

Before the historical movement captured and swirled in a terrible storm of cruel events of the rebellion of the fictional heroes of the story, Pushkin vividly and lovingly describes the life of the Grinev family, the unlucky Beaupre, faithful and devoted Savelich, Captain Mironov, his wife Vasilisa Yegorovna, daughter Masha and the entire population of the dilapidated fortress. The simple, inconspicuous life of these families, with their old patriarchal way of life, is also Russian history, going on invisibly to prying eyes. It is done quietly, "at home". Therefore, it should be described in the same way. Walter Scott served as an example of such an image for Pushkin. Pushkin admired his ability to present history through life, customs, family traditions.

In KD, all Pushkin's illusions about a possible peace between the nobles and peasants collapsed, the tragic situation was exposed with even more obviousness than before. And the more clearly and responsibly the task arose of finding a positive answer, resolving the tragic contradiction. To this end, Pushkin skillfully organizes the plot. The novel, the core of which is the love story of Masha Mironova and Pyotr Grinev, has turned into a broad historical narrative. This principle - from private destinies to the historical destinies of the people - permeates the plot of The Captain's Daughter, and it can be easily seen in every significant episode.

"The Captain's Daughter" has become a truly historical work, saturated with modern social content. Heroes and secondary persons are displayed in Pushkin's work as multilateral characters. Pushkin does not have only positive or only negative characters. Everyone acts as a living person with his inherent good and bad features, which are manifested primarily in actions. Fictional characters are associated with historical figures and are included in the historical movement. It was the course of history that determined the actions of the heroes, forging their difficult fate.

Thanks to the principle of historicism (the unstoppable movement of history, striving towards infinity, containing many trends and opening up new horizons), neither Pushkin nor his heroes succumb to despondency in the most gloomy circumstances, they do not lose faith in either personal or general happiness. Pushkin finds the ideal in reality and thinks of its realization in the course of historical process. He dreams that in the future there will be no social stratification and social discord. This will become possible when humanism, humanity will be the basis of state policy.

Pushkin's heroes appear in the novel from two sides: as people, that is, in their universal and national qualities, and as characters playing social roles, that is, in their social and public functions.

Grinev is both an ardent young man who received a patriarchal upbringing at home, and an ordinary undergrowth, who gradually becomes an adult and courageous warrior, and a nobleman, officer, "servant of the king", faithful to the laws of honor; Pugachev - and an ordinary peasant, not alien to natural feelings, in the spirit folk traditions protecting an orphan, and a cruel leader of a peasant rebellion, who hates nobles and officials.

In each character, Pushkin discovers the truly human and social. Each camp has its own social truth, and both these truths are irreconcilable. But each camp is characterized by humanity. If social truths separate people, then humanity unites them. Where the social and moral laws of any camp operate, the human shrinks and disappears.

Pushkin, however, is not a utopian; he does not portray the matter as if the cases he described have become the norm. On the contrary, they did not become a reality, but their triumph, even in the distant future, is possible. Pushkin refers to those times, continuing the important theme in his work of mercy and justice, when humanity becomes the law of human existence. In the present tense, however, a sad note sounds, amending the bright history of Pushkin's heroes - as soon as big events leave with historical scene, the cute characters of the novel also become invisible, getting lost in the flow of life. They touched historical life only for a short time. However, sadness does not wash away Pushkin's confidence in the course of history, in the victory of humanity.

The history of the creation of the work "The Captain's Daughter"

The topic of popular uprisings led by Razin and Pugachev interested Pushkin as early as 1824, shortly after his arrival in Mikhailovskoye. In the first half of November 1824, in a letter to his brother Leo, he asked to send him "The Life of Emelka Pugachev" (Pushkin, vol. 13, p. 119). Pushkin had in mind the book "False Peter III, or Life, character and atrocities of the rebel Emelka Pugachev" (Moscow, 1809). In the next letter to his brother, Pushkin writes: “Ah! Oh my god, I almost forgot! Here is your task: historical, dry news about Senka Razin, the only poetic person in Russian history ”(Pushkin, vol. 13, p. 121). In Mikhailovsky, Pushkin processed folk songs about Razin.
The poet's interest in the topic was also due to the fact that the second half of the 1820s was marked by a wave of peasant indignations, the unrest did not bypass the Pskov region, where Pushkin lived until the autumn of 1826 and where he repeatedly visited later. The peasant unrest of the late 1820s created an alarming situation.
On September 17, 1832, Pushkin left for Moscow, where P.V. Nashchokin told him about litigation Belarusian nobleman Ostrovsky; this story formed the basis of the story "Dubrovsky"; the idea of ​​a story about a Pugachev nobleman was temporarily abandoned - Pushkin returned to it at the end of January 1833. During these years, the poet actively collected historical material for a future book: he worked in the archives, visited places associated with the Pugachev uprising. As a result, a book about Pugachev was created simultaneously with The Captain's Daughter. Work on The History of Pugachev helped Pushkin to realize his artistic vision: The Captain's Daughter was roughly finished on July 23, 1836. Pushkin, not entirely satisfied with the original version, rewrote the book. On October 19, The Captain's Daughter was rewritten to the end, and on October 24 it was sent to the censor. Pushkin asked the censor, PA. Korsakov, not to disclose the secret of his authorship, intending to publish the story anonymously. The Captain's Daughter appeared on December 22, 1836 in the fourth issue of the Sovremennik magazine.

Genus, genre, creative method

Pushkin probably chose the title for his work only in the autumn of 1836, when the manuscript was sent by the writer to the censors; Until that time, when referring to The Captain's Daughter in his letters, Pushkin called his story simply a novel. To this day, there is no consensus on the definition of the genre of The Captain's Daughter. The work is called both a novel, and a story, and a family chronicle. As mentioned above, the poet himself considered his work a novel. Later, researchers came to the conclusion that "The Captain's Daughter" is a story. In form, these are memoirs - notes by old Grinev, in which he recalls a story that happened in his youth - a family chronicle intertwined with historical events. So, the genre of The Captain's Daughter can be defined as a historical novel in memoir form. It is no coincidence that Pushkin turned to the memoir form. Firstly, the memoirs gave the work the color of the era; secondly, they helped to avoid censorship difficulties.
Documentary is obvious in the work, its heroes are real-life people: Catherine II, Pugachev, his associates Khlopusha and Beloborodoe. At the same time, historical events are refracted through the fate of fictional characters. A love affair appears. artistic fiction, the complexity of the composition and the construction of characters make it possible to attribute Pushkin's work to the genre of the novel.
The Captain's Daughter is a realistic work, although not without some features of romanticism. The realism of the novel lies in the objective depiction of historical events associated with the Pugachev uprising, depicting the realities of life and life of the nobility, ordinary Russian people, serfs. romantic traits appear in episodes related to the love line of the novel. The plot itself is romantic.

Subject of the analyzed work

There are two main problems in The Captain's Daughter. These are socio-historical and moral problems. Pushkin wanted, first of all, to show how the fate of the heroes of the story developed, who fell into the cycle of historical upheavals. The problem of the people and the problem of the Russian national character. The problem of the people is embodied through the ratio of the images of Pugachev and Savelich, through the depiction of the characters of the inhabitants of the Belogorsk fortress.
The proverb, taken by Pushkin as an epigraph to the whole story, draws the reader's attention to the ideological and moral content of the work: one of the most important problems of The Captain's Daughter is the problem moral education, the formation of the personality of Peter Andreevich Grinev, the protagonist of the story. The epigraph is an abbreviated version of the Russian proverb: "Take care of the dress again, and honor from youth." Grinev the father recalls this proverb in full, admonishing his son, who is leaving for the army. The problem of honor and duty is revealed through the opposition of Grinev and Shvabrin. Different facets of this problem are reflected in the images of Captain Mironov, Vasilisa Yegorovna, Masha Mironova and other characters.
The problem of the moral education of a young man of his time deeply worried Pushkin; with particular acuteness, she stood before the writer after the defeat of the Decembrist uprising, which in Pushkin's mind was perceived as a tragic denouement life path his best contemporaries. The accession of Nicholas I led to a sharp change in the moral "climate" noble society, to oblivion of the educational traditions of the XVIII century. Under these conditions, Pushkin felt an urgent need to compare the moral experience of different generations, to show the continuity between them. Pushkin contrasts the representatives of the "new nobility" with people who are morally whole, not affected by the thirst for ranks, orders and profit.
One of the most important moral problems of the novel - the personality at the turning points of history - remains relevant today. The writer raised the question: is it possible to preserve honor and dignity in the struggle of opposing social forces? And he answered it at a high artistic level. Maybe!

A well-known researcher of creativity A.S. Pushkin Yu.M. Lotman wrote: “The entire artistic fabric of The Captain's Daughter is clearly divided into two ideological and stylistic layers, subordinate to the image of the worlds - noble and peasant. It would be an unacceptable simplification, preventing penetration into Pushkin’s true intention, to consider that the noble world is depicted in the story only satirically, and the peasant world only sympathetically, as well as to assert that everything poetic in the noble camp belongs, according to Pushkin, not specifically to the noble, but nationwide beginning.
In the author's ambiguous attitude to the uprising and Pugachev himself, as well as to Grinev and other characters, lies ideological orientation novel. Pushkin could not have a positive attitude towards the cruelty of the rebellion ("God forbid to see the Russian rebellion, senseless and merciless!"), although he understood that the people's desire for freedom and freedom is manifested in the uprising. Pugachev, for all his cruelty, in the image of Pushkin is sympathetic. He is shown as a man of wide soul, not devoid of mercy. In the storyline of love between Grinev and Masha Mironova, the author presented the ideal of selfless love.

Main heroes

N.V. Gogol wrote that in The Captain's Daughter “truly Russian characters appeared for the first time: a simple commandant of a fortress, a captain, a lieutenant; the fortress itself with a single cannon, the stupidity of time and the simple grandeur of ordinary people, everything is not only the very truth, but even, as it were, better than it.
The system of characters in the work is based on the presence or absence of the spiritual victorious principle in a person. Thus, the principle of confrontation between good, light, love, truth and evil, darkness, hatred, lies is reflected in the novel in the contrasting distribution of the main characters. Grinev and Marya Ivanovna are in the same circle; in the other, Pugachev and Shvabrin.
The central figure in the novel is Pugachev. All the storylines of Pushkin's work converge to him. Pugachev in the image of Pushkin is a talented leader of a spontaneous popular movement, he embodies a bright folk character. He can be both cruel and scary, and fair and grateful. His attitude towards Grinev and Masha Mironova is indicative. The elements of the popular movement captured Pugachev, the motives of his actions are embedded in the morality of the Kalmyk fairy tale, which he tells Grinev: “... rather than eat carrion for three hundred years, it’s better to drink living blood once, and then what God will give!”
In comparison with Pugachev, Pyotr Andreevich Grinev is a fictional character. The name of Grinev (in the draft version he was called Bu-lanin) was not chosen by chance. In government documents relating to the Pugachev rebellion, Grinev's name was listed among those who were at first under suspicion and then acquitted. Coming from an impoverished noble family, Petrusha Grinev at the beginning of the story is a vivid example of an undergrowth, treated kindly and loved by his family. Circumstances military service contribute to the maturation of Grinev, in the future he appears as a decent person, capable of bold deeds.
“The name of the girl Mironova,” Pushkin wrote on October 25, 1836, to the PA censor Korsakov, “is fictitious. My novel is based on a legend, which I once heard, that one of the officers who betrayed his duty and joined the Pugachev gangs was pardoned by the Empress at the request of her elderly father, who threw himself at her feet. The novel, as you will see, has gone far from the truth. Having settled on the title "The Captain's Daughter", Pushkin emphasized the importance of the image of Marya Ivanovna Mironova in the novel. The captain's daughter is depicted as something bright, young and pure. Behind this appearance shines through the heavenly purity of the soul. The main content of her inner world is complete trust in God. Throughout the entire novel, there is never even a hint of not only a rebellion, but also a doubt about the correctness or justice of what is happening. So, this is most clearly manifested in Masha's refusal to marry a loved one against the will of his parents: “Your relatives do not want me in their family. Be in everything the will of the Lord! God knows better than we what we need. There is nothing to do, Pyotr Andreevich; at least be happy..." Masha united in herself best qualities Russian national character - faith, the ability to sincere self-sacrificing love. She is a vivid, memorable image, Pushkin's "sweet ideal".
Looking for a hero for historical narrative Pushkin drew attention to the figure of Shvanvich, a nobleman who served Pugachev; in the final version of the story, this historical person, with a significant change in the motives for his transition to the side of Pugachev, turned into Shvabrin. This character has absorbed all sorts of negative characteristics, the main of which is presented in the definition of Vasilisa Egorovna, given by her when reprimanding Grinev for the fight: “Peter Andreevich! I didn't expect this from you. How are you not ashamed? Good Alexei Ivanovich: he was discharged from the guards for murder, and he does not believe in the Lord God; and what are you? are you going there?" The captain accurately pointed out the essence of the confrontation between Shvabrin and Grinev: the godlessness of the first, which dictates all the meanness of his behavior, and the faith of the second, which is the basis of worthy behavior and good deeds. His feeling for the captain's daughter is a passion that revealed in him all the worst properties and traits: ignobleness, meanness of nature, bitterness.

Place secondary characters in the system of images

An analysis of the work shows that the relatives and friends of Grinev and Masha play an important role in the system of characters. This is Andrei Petrovich Grinev, the father of the protagonist. A representative of the ancient nobility, a man of high moral principles. It is he who sends his son to the army to "sniff the gunpowder". Next to him in life is his wife and mother Peter - Avdotya Vasilievna. She is the epitome of kindness and maternal love. The serf Savelich (Arkhip Savelyev) can rightfully be attributed to the Grinev family. He is a caring uncle, Peter's teacher, who selflessly accompanies the pupil in all his adventures. Savelich showed particular courage in the scene of the execution of the defenders of the Belogorsk fortress. The image of Savelich reflected a typical image of the upbringing that was given at that time to the sons of landowners who lived in their villages.
Captain Ivan Kuzmich Mironov, commandant of the Belogorsk Fortress, is an honest and kind man. He bravely fights against the rebels, protecting the fortress, and with it his family. Captain Mironov fulfilled his soldier's duty with honor, giving his life for the fatherland. The fate of the captain was shared by his wife Vasilisa Yegorovna, hospitable and power-hungry, cordial and courageous.
Some characters in the novel have historical prototypes. This is primarily Pugachev and Catherine II. Then Pugachev's associates: Corporal Beloborodoe, Afanasy Sokolov (Khlopusha).

Plot and composition

The plot of The Captain's Daughter is based on the fate of the young officer Pyotr Grinev, who managed to remain kind and humane in difficult historical circumstances. Love story The relationship between Grinev and Masha Mironova, the daughter of the commandant of the Belogorsk fortress, takes place during the Pugachev uprising (1773-1774). Pugachev is the link of all storylines of the novel.
There are fourteen chapters in The Captain's Daughter. The whole novel and each chapter is preceded by an epigraph, there are seventeen of them in the novel. The epigraphs focus the reader's attention on the most important episodes, the author's position is determined. The epigraph to the whole novel: "Take care of honor from a young age" - defines the main moral problem of the whole work is a problem of honor and dignity. The events are presented in memoir form on behalf of the aged Pyotr Grinev. At the end last chapter the narration is conducted by the "publisher", behind whom Pushkin himself is hiding. Final words"publisher" are the epilogue of "The Captain's Daughter".
The first two chapters are an exposition of the story and introduce readers to the main characters - the bearers of the ideals of the nobility and peasant worlds. The story about Grinev's family and upbringing, riddled with irony, plunges us into the world of the old local nobility. The description of the life of the Grinevs resurrects the atmosphere of that noble culture that gave rise to the cult of duty, honor and humanity. Petrush was brought up by deep ties with ancestral roots, reverence family traditions. The description of the life of the Mironov family in the Belogorsk fortress in the first three chapters of the main part of the narrative is permeated with the same atmosphere: "Fortress", "Duel", "Love".
The seven chapters of the main part, which tell about life in the Belogorsk fortress, are important for the development of the love storyline. The plot of this line is the acquaintance of Petrusha with Masha Mironova, in a collision because of her, Grinev and Shvabrin develop an action, and a declaration of love between the wounded Grinev and Masha is the culmination of the development of their relationship. However, the heroes' romance comes to a standstill after a letter from Grinev's father, who refuses his son's consent to marriage. The events that prepared the way out of the love impasse are narrated in the chapter "Pugachevshchina".
In the plot construction of the novel are clearly indicated as love line, and historical events, closely intertwined. The chosen plot and compositional structure of the work allows Pushkin to most fully reveal the personality of Pugachev, comprehend the popular uprising, using the example of Grinev and Masha, to turn to the basic moral values ​​of the Russian national character.

Artistic originality of the work

One of general principles Russian prose before Pushkin was its rapprochement with poetry. Pushkin refused such a rapprochement. Pushkin's prose is distinguished by brevity and plot-compositional clarity. IN last years the poet was worried about a certain number of problems: the role of the individual in history, the relationship between the nobility and the people, the problem of the old and new nobility. The literature that preceded Pushkin created a certain, often one-linear type of hero, in which some one passion dominated. Pushkin rejects such a hero and creates his own. Pushkin's hero is, first of all, a living person with all his passions; moreover, Pushkin defiantly refuses to romantic hero. He introduces the average person as the main character into the artistic world, which makes it possible to reveal the special, typical features of a particular era, situation. At the same time, Pushkin deliberately slows down the development of the plot, using a complicated composition, the image of the narrator, and other artistic devices.

So, in The Captain's Daughter, a "publisher" appears, who, on behalf of the author, expresses his attitude to what is happening. The author's position is indicated by various techniques: parallelism in the development of storylines, composition, system of images, titles of chapters, selection of epigraphs and inserted elements, mirror comparison of episodes, verbal portrait heroes of the novel.
Important for Pushkin was the question of style and language. prose work. In the note “On the reasons that slowed down the progress of our literature,” he wrote: “Our prose has not yet been processed so little that even in simple correspondence we are forced to create turns of words to explain the most ordinary concepts ...” Thus, Pushkin was faced with the task of creating a new prose language. Pushkin himself defined the distinctive properties of such a language in the note “On Prose”: “Accuracy and brevity are the first virtues of prose. It requires thoughts and thoughts - without them, brilliant expressions are of no use. Such was the prose of Pushkin himself. Simple two-part sentences, without complex syntactic formations, a negligible number of metaphors and precise epithets - such is the style of Pushkin's prose. Here is an excerpt from The Captain's Daughter, typical of Pushkin's prose: “Pugachev has left. For a long time I looked at the white steppe, along which his troika was rushing. The people dispersed. Shvabrin disappeared. I returned to the priest's house. Everything was ready for our departure; I didn't want to delay any longer." Pushkin's prose was accepted by his contemporaries without much interest, but Gogol, Dostoevsky and Turgenev grew out of it in the further development.
The peasant way of life in the novel is covered with special poetry: songs, fairy tales, legends permeate the whole atmosphere of the story about the people. The text contains a burlak song and a Kalmyk folk tale, in which Pugachev explains his philosophy of life to Grinev.
An important place in the novel is occupied by proverbs, which reflect the originality of folk thought. Researchers have repeatedly paid attention to the role of proverbs and riddles in the characterization of Pugachev. But other characters from the people also speak proverbs. Savelyich writes in a reply to the master: "... be a good fellow, do not reproach: a horse with four legs, but stumbles."

Meaning

The Captain's Daughter is Pushkin's final work both in the genre of fiction and in all his work. And indeed, in this work, many of Pushkin's exciting thoughts came together throughout for long years themes, problems, ideas; means and ways of their artistic embodiment; basic principles creative method; author's assessment and ideological position By key concepts the existence of man and the world.
Being historical novel, including real concrete historical material (events, historical figures), "The Captain's Daughter" contains in a concentrated form the formulation and solution of socio-historical, psychological, moral and religious issues. The novel was ambiguously received by Pushkin's contemporaries and played a decisive role in the further development of Russian literary prose.
One of the first reviews written after the publication of The Captain's Daughter belongs to V.F. Odoevsky and is dated approximately December 26 of the same year. “You know everything that I think about you and feel for you,” Odoevsky writes to Pushkin, “but here is criticism not in artistic, but in reading terms: Pugachev attacks the fortress too soon after he is first spoken about; the increase in rumors is not quite extended - the reader does not have time to be afraid for the inhabitants of the Belogorsk fortress, when it has already been taken. Apparently, Odoevsky was struck by the brevity of the narrative, the unexpectedness and speed of the plot twists, the compositional dynamism, which, as a rule, were not characteristic of historical works of that time. Odoevsky praised the image of Savelich, calling him "the most tragic face." Pugachev, from his point of view, is “wonderful; it is masterfully drawn. Shvabrin is sketched beautifully, but only sketched; it is difficult for the reader's teeth to chew through his transition from a guard officer to Pugachev's accomplices.<...>Shvabrin is too smart and subtle to believe in the possibility of Pugachev's success, and is displeased with passion to decide on such a thing out of love for Masha. Masha has been in his power for so long, but he does not use these minutes. For the time being Shvabrin has a lot of moral and miraculous things for me; Maybe when I read it for the third time, I'll understand better. The sympathetic positive characteristics of The Captain's Daughter, which belong to V.K. Kuchelbecker, P.A. Katenin, P.A. Vyazemsky, A.I. Turgenev.
“... This whole story “The Captain's Daughter” is a miracle of art. Don't subscribe to it Pushkin, and you really might think that it was actually written by some old man, eyewitness and the hero of the events described, the story is so naive and artless, so that in this miracle of art, art, as it were, disappeared, was lost, came to nature ... ”- wrote F.M. Dostoevsky.
What is the Captain's Daughter? Everyone knows that this is one of the most precious assets of our literature. By the simplicity and purity of its poetry, this work is equally accessible, equally attractive to adults and children. On The Captain's Daughter (just like on S. Aksakov's Family Chronicle) Russian children educate their mind and their feelings, because teachers, without any extraneous instructions, find that there is no book in our literature more understandable and entertaining and at the same time, so serious in content and high in creativity,” N.N. expressed his opinion. Strakhov.
The later response of the writer V.A. adjoins the reviews of Pushkin’s literary associates. Sollogub: “There is a work by Pushkin, little appreciated, little noticed, but in which, however, he expressed all his knowledge, all his artistic convictions. This is the story of the Pugachev rebellion. In the hands of Pushkin, on the one hand, there were dry documents, the topic was ready. On the other hand, pictures of a daring robber life, Russian former life, the Volga expanse, steppe nature could not help but smile at his imagination. Here the didactic and lyrical poet had an inexhaustible source for descriptions, for impulses. But Pushkin overcame himself. He did not allow himself to deviate from the connection of historical events, did not utter an extra word - he calmly distributed all the parts of his story in due proportion, approved his style with the dignity, calmness and laconicism of history and conveyed simply, but harmonic language historical episode. In this work it is impossible not to see how the artist could control his talent, but it was also impossible for the poet to keep the excess of his personal feelings, and they poured out in the Captain's daughter, they gave her color, fidelity, charm, completeness, to which Pushkin had never exalted in the integrity of his works.

This is interesting

The problems posed by Pushkin in The Captain's Daughter remained unresolved. This is what attracts more than one generation of artists and musicians to the novel. Based on the work of Pushkin, a picture was painted by V.G. Perov "Pugachevshchina" (1879). The illustrations of The Captain's Daughter by M.V. Nesterov (“The Siege”, “Pugachev freeing Masha from the claims of Shvabrin”, etc.) and watercolors by SV. Ivanova. In 1904, AN illustrated The Captain's Daughter. Be-nua. The scenes of Pugachev's trial in the Belogorsk fortress were interpreted different artists, among which famous names: An. Benois (1920), A. F. Pakhomov (1944), M. S. Rodionov (1949), S. Gerasimov (1951), P. L. Bunin, AAPlastov, S. V. Ivanov (1960s. ). In 1938, N.V. worked on illustrations for the novel. Favorsky. In a series of 36 watercolors for The Captain's Daughter, SV. Gerasimov, the image of Pugachev is given in development. A mysterious figure in an inn, a multi-figure spread, a court in the Belogorsk fortress - the center of the artistic solution of the work of AS. Pushkin and a series of watercolors. One of the contemporary illustrators of Pushkin's novel is DA Shmarinov (1979).
More than 1000 composers turned to the poet's work; about 500 Pushkin's compositions (poetry, prose, drama) formed the basis of more than 3,000 musical works. The story "The Captain's Daughter" served as the basis for the creation of operas by CA Cui and SA Katz, V.I. Rebikov, opera designs by M.P. Mussorgsky and P.I. Tchaikovsky, ballet N.N. Tcherepnin, film scores and theatrical performances G.N. Dudkevich, V.A. Dekhterev, V.N. Kryukova, S.S. Prokofiev, T.N. Khrennikov.
(According to the book "Pushkin in Music" - M., 1974)

Good DD Pushkin's skill. M., 1955.
Lotman Yum. In the school of poetry. Pushkin. Lermontov. Gogol. M., 1998.
Lotman Yum. Pushkin. SPb., 1995.
Oksman Yu.G. Pushkin in his work on the novel "The Captain's Daughter". M., 1984.
Tsvetaeva MM. Prose. M., 1989.

The story of A.S. Pushkin's "The Captain's Daughter" (1836) is based on real historical events. It describes the uprising of Yemelyan Pugachev. The narration in this work is conducted on behalf of the nobleman Pyotr Grinev. The main part of The Captain's Daughter is a description of the hero's life in the Belogorsk fortress, where he was sent to serve.

Grinev got into this fortress at the age of sixteen. Before that, he lived in his father's house under the supervision of a loving father and mother who took care of him in everything: "I lived underage, chasing pigeons and playing leapfrog with the yard boys." We can say that, once in the fortress, Grinev was still a child. The Belogorsk fortress played the role of a cruel educator in his fate. Coming out of its walls, Grinev was a fully formed personality with his own views and beliefs, moral values ​​and the ability to defend them.

The first striking event that influenced Grinev's personality was his love for the daughter of the commandant of the fortress, Masha Mironova. The hero admits that at first Masha did not like him. Another officer who served in the fortress, Shvabrin, told a lot of unpleasant things about her. But over time, Grinev became convinced that Masha was "a reasonable and prudent girl." He became more and more attached to her. Once, having heard insulting words about his beloved from Shvabrin, Grinev could not restrain himself.

Despite all the resistance of the commandant and his wife, the rivals secretly fought with swords. Shvabrin dishonorably wounded Pyotr Grinev when he turned away at Savelich's cry. After this event, Grinev and Masha were convinced that they loved each other, and decided to get married. But Peter's parents did not give their consent. Shvabrin secretly wrote to them and said that Grinev fought a duel and was even wounded.

After that, the characters began to feel great dislike for each other. Although at first Grinev most of all agreed with Shvabrin. This officer was closest to the hero in terms of education, interests, mental development.

There was one thing between them, but the fundamental difference was in the moral level. This Grinev began to notice gradually. First, according to unworthy men reviews about Masha. As it turned out later, Shvabrin was simply taking revenge on the girl for refusing his courtship. But all the meanness of the nature of this hero was revealed during the climactic events of the story: the capture of the fortress by Pugachev and his associates. Shvabrin, who swore allegiance to the empress, without hesitation went over to the side of the rebels. Moreover, he became one of their leaders there. Shvabrin coolly watched the execution of the commandant and his wife, who treated him so well. Taking advantage of his power and Masha's helplessness, this "hero" kept her and wanted to forcefully marry the girl. Only the intervention of Grinev and the mercy of Pugachev saved Masha from this fate.

Grinev, without knowing it, met with Pugachev even outside the walls of the Belogorsk fortress. This "man" brought them out of the snowstorm with Savelich, for which he received a hare sheepskin coat as a gift from Grinev. This gift largely determined Pugachev's good attitude towards the hero in the future. In the Belogorsk fortress, Grinev defended the name of the empress. A sense of duty did not allow him to recognize the sovereign in Pugachev, even under pain of death. He candidly tells the impostor that he is playing a "dangerous joke". In addition, Grinev admits that if necessary, he will go to fight against Pugachev.

Seeing all the atrocities committed by the impostor, Grinev treated him like a villain. In addition, he learned that Shvabrin was becoming the commandant of the fortress, and Masha would be at his complete disposal. Leaving for Orenburg, the hero left his heart in the fortress. Soon he returned there to help Masha. Unwillingly communicating with Pugachev, Grinev changes his mind about the impostor. He begins to see in him a person who has human feelings: gratitude, compassion, fun, fear, apprehension. Grinev saw that Pugachev had a lot of feigned, artificial things. In public, he played the role of the sovereign-emperor. Left alone with Grinev, Pugachev showed himself as a man, told Peter his philosophy of life, contained in Kalmyk fairy tale. Grinev cannot understand and accept this philosophy. For him, a nobleman and an officer, it is not clear how one can live, killing people and committing all kinds of atrocities. For Pugachev human life means very little. For an impostor, the main thing is to achieve his goal, no matter what the victims.

Pugachev became a benefactor for Grinev, a kind of godfather, because he saved Masha from Shvabrin and allowed the lovers to leave the fortress. But even this could not bring him closer to Grinev: too different life philosophies these heroes had.

The Belogorsk fortress and the events that were associated with it played a key role in the life of Pyotr Grinev. Here the hero met his love. Here, under the influence of terrible events, he matured, matured, and established himself in his devotion to the empress. Here Grinev passed the "strength test" and withstood it with honor. In addition, in the Belogorsk fortress, Grinev witnessed events that shook the whole country. The meeting with Pugachev concerned not only him. Grinev participated in an important historical event and passed through all the trials with dignity. It can be said about him that he "kept honor from a young age."

0 people have viewed this page. Register or login and find out how many people from your school have already copied this essay.

/ Works / Pushkin A.S. / The Captain's Daughter / The Belogorsk Fortress in the life of Pyotr Grinev (based on the story by A.S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter").

See also the work "The Captain's Daughter":

We will write an excellent essay according to your order in just 24 hours. A unique piece in a single copy.

My impressions of the story "The Captain's Daughter"

Not so long ago I read the story of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin “The Captain's Daughter. In this small message, I would like to briefly talk about the work itself, as well as about how it made me feel.

Pyotr Grinev is the main character of the story, around whom the whole story revolves. It all started with the fact that his father wants to send him to serve in St. Petersburg, but changes his decision, and our main character goes to serve in the Belogorsk fortress. What can I say, the first impression of the place where he was sent to serve was far from the best.

Life there seemed to him not at all as attractive as in stately St. Petersburg, however, things got really bad when, expecting to see a real fortress there with towers and high walls, he saw only a village surrounded wooden fence. However, over time, attitudes began to change. They took him in the village as a native, at first he seemed an extremely unpleasant person, the commandant, suddenly turned out to be pleasant, and his daughter was very good-looking.

He immediately became friends with Shvabrin, both of them were glad for each other, as very educated natures. However, soon their relationship to each other worsened, the reason for this was Shvabrin's jealousy. And he was jealous of Maria, the daughter of the commandant, to Grinev. Everything came to a duel with swords, in which the main character was injured. However, this event was the occasion for the beginning of a relationship between Mary and Peter.

Relations developed, Grinev invited Maria to marry him, she agreed, but she could not go out without the consent of her parents. Together they wrote a letter that, according to the bride, was capable of “moving to pity even the most severe person,” but ... Disagreement. Peter was morally broken.

Time passed, and in the end, after a series of events, the Pugachevites attacked the fortress. The whole village was killed, and at the very end, when Grinev got the opportunity to appear before Pugachev, he recognized him. It was their leader who, during a snowstorm, accompanied them to the inn. Peter was pardoned.

From this whole story, the main character learned a lot of useful things. Like what gambling they don’t lead to anything good, he learned what a duel is, which can become deadly. But it doesn't matter, the important thing is that he knew what true love is.

I think that the work is excellent, and very instructive. After reading it, you can not only adopt the experience of Peter, but also draw some of your own conclusions. You should definitely read it carefully!

Attention, only TODAY!