Should a person tolerate dishonor. Approximate options for entry and conclusion in the direction of "honor and dishonor"

The choice between honor and dishonor, sooner or later, arises in every person. We find ourselves in a situation where we have a fork in front of us: one road is straight, the other path is curved, but straight ahead. We understand that the second option will bring us to the goal much easier and faster, but the first one will allow us to preserve our dignity and good name. Many people choose what is the least difficult, because they do not have the moral strength to get their way honestly. However, there are those who will not sacrifice virtue for anything. Difficult choice situation good way check what a person is worth. When does it occur and how can you recognize it?

To answer this question, let's turn to fiction. In Tolstoy's novel "Anna Karenina" the heroine falls in love with the handsome Vronsky, although she - married woman and exemplary mother. She never loved her husband, because the difference in age and interests did not allow them to get closer, so she can be understood. The young officer soon achieves reciprocity, he and Anna become lovers. Obviously, the heroes had to choose between honor and dishonor when they realized that they were in love. There was no honest way for them initially, because divorce in those days was already considered a dishonor. How to proceed? betray love? Deceive your spouse? They didn't know the answer either. And no one knows exactly how to behave in such a situation. You can’t come to terms with the fact that you need to live life without love, but betrayal is not a way out. In literature, this is called a “collision” (an insoluble conflict), and then a difficult choice arises, because there is no straight road, and the boundaries between honor and dishonor are erased.

In Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment" was also affected. Sonya Marmeladova is forced to feed her family, as her father drinks away all the money, and her stepmother is ill with consumption. She had to get a "yellow ticket". From that moment on, the girl parted with honor, correcting her human dignity. But we have a collision again: it has no other way out. Either the whole family dies of starvation, or Sonya sacrifices herself for their lives. It cannot be said that she went this way for the sake of money or that she was depraved by nature. Vice did not touch her even on the panel. But in a situation of extreme need, the heroine did not appreciate her good name too highly, because the life of the family was on the other side of the scale. Poverty is vicious in itself, because it devalues ​​human dignity. Therefore, people who are in great need of funds are always at a crossroads.

When does the choice between honor and dishonor arise? When nothing happens in life, and a person is calm, he is likely to live honestly, since there is no temptation, but in love fever and in extreme need, we are all capable of doubting the expediency of virtue.

Verified final essay on the topic "If a person has committed dishonorable act, then he is dishonorable to the end "in the direction of" Honor and dishonor "

Introduction (intro):

Of course, each person understands differently This statement. dishonor - This negative trait a person characterized by meanness, deceit, betrayal, deceit. Honor, on the contrary, combines such qualities as fidelity, devotion. Honor always opposes dishonor, in all ages people fight for truth and justice. If You stumbled and committed a dishonorable act, then, alas, you will no longer be able to possess such qualities as loyalty to the word, nobility, decency.

A comment: repetitions are one of the most common mistakes. To avoid them, you need to reread the essay several times and replace the words repeated in two adjacent sentences with pronouns, lexical or contextual synonyms (or synonymous expressions). It is also important to ensure that there are no words with the same root in adjacent sentences.

"If You stumbled and committed a dishonorable act ... ”- it is better not to use the pronoun“ YOU ”when writing an essay. This is only allowed in colloquial speech. Instead of "you" you can write "we", "people", "man", etc.

"If Human stumbled and committed a dishonorable act, then, alas, to him it will no longer be possible to possess such qualities as loyalty to the word, nobility, decency "

The thesis, of course, corresponds to the topic, but there are two nuances:

Emphasis should be placed on the thesis, with the help of introductory words, which indicate that this is exactly your opinion (“I think”, “it seems to me”, “in my opinion”, “I am sure”, etc.) Writing a thesis is not enough, it is important to convey to the inspector how you came to such an inference. In the introductory part, you painted the meanings key concepts, but did not tie it to the thesis. Most likely, you would have been given a failure on the first criterion, because. topic is not covered. To fix this, you need to answer the question: “why is the one who has committed a dishonorable act dishonest to the end?” You can write your thoughts on this issue before the thesis.

Argument 1:

Reflecting on the topic of "disgrace", I can not help but refer to the work of Vasily Bykov "Sotnikov". This is a work about two partisans who were captured. going (ugly word, try to replace) for food for their comrades, each of the heroes reacts differently to the impending danger. Rybak is serious, ready for any difficulties, unlike the weak, frail, sick Sotnikov. Having hit to the police, their the paths diverge (speech error, it turns out that the police got the path). They are going to be interrogated. Sotnikov went first. He was silent, did not tell the investigator anything. Humiliation, torture, did not force Sotnikov to betray his homeland, his detachment. After which he was to be executed. However, Rybak under interrogation behaved in the opposite way(a speech error, they don’t say that. Something can be opposite: coast, reaction, behavior. But you can’t behave in the opposite way) to your friend. He answered the interrogator's questions in detail, was polite, clung to every opportunity to escape. To which the investigator offered to become one of them. The fisherman was delighted that there was a chance for freedom. He did the worst and most dishonest thing ever. It turned out to be more difficult and painful for the fisherman to stay alive. He understood that he had made huge mistakes by killing his friend and going over to the wrong side, thereby losing his honor and gaining dishonor forever.

A comment: the argument is unconvincing. It is clear that Rybak committed a dishonorable act, but why did he forever find dishonor? How is it shown?

Thus, this argument does not support the thesis.

Argument 2:

As proof, one can also cite the work of Valentin Rasputin "Live and Remember". This is a work about Andrei Guskov, who, along with the entire male part of the village, was sent to war. He fought well, conscientiously performed all duties. At the end of the war, Andrei, having been wounded, ends up in the hospital. Guskov wanted to return at least for a while home, at least for one day. He was sure that he would be sent from the hospital home, but that did not happen. And so Andrei returns home ahead of schedule, returns not as a hero, but as a deserter. Desertion is betrayal. Nastena, Andrey's wife, can not part of the husband(?), but she tried, helped in any way she could. Her strength is Love and faith, but because of love for bad person she suffers herself. Andrei did not want to live on, he did not see the point in later life and the only way out is death. The act of Andrei Guskov is an example of a dishonorable act.

Essay-reasoning in the direction: Honor and dishonor

Confucius said: “People want wealth and fame for themselves; if both cannot be obtained honestly, they should be avoided.” And what did he mean by these words? He probably meant to say that wealth and fame have no meaning if they were acquired through dishonor and lies.

And what is honor? How do we understand this word? Honor is a concept associated with such qualities as loyalty and justice, truthfulness and nobility. This is the criterion of a real person, distinguished by the stamina of nature, willpower and purity of his thoughts. It is difficult to force such a person to follow the path of lies and betrayal, deceit and evil. He will not stand against honor and truth. Wealth and fame are not the most important things in life. And you should think before you do anything.

The problem of honor and dignity worried many writers, in particular Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin. In his work " Captain's daughter"The writer vividly showed a hero who possessed those qualities thanks to which he could be called a man of honor. Pyotr Grinev's father said: "Take care of your honor from a young age." He does not want his son to become a simple reveler, and therefore sends him to the service, where young Peter meets people who are devoted to their homeland and uniform, with those who will never allow themselves and their friends to be dishonored. And this meeting played an important role in Grinev's life. He passes the test with dignity and honor, without losing his honor, although there were many opportunities. I think that this hero can be called a worthy person.

Unfortunately, there are many heroes in the world of literature whose nobility has lost its meaning. Aleksey Shvabrin is an example of a vile person who dishonored his honor. The reason for this was the fear of the enemy, in whose person Pugachev was. He is afraid for his own life. He does not know a sense of duty and dignity, for the sake of personal gain he is ready for anything, which is why he humiliates himself in front of Pugachev, trying to please the enemy. Long ago, back in the fortress, he crossed the boundaries defined by honor, wrote a letter - a denunciation to Grinev's father, trying to destroy the love that had just begun between Peter and Masha. It is terrible to meet in life with a man like Shvabrin - insidious, cruel and unprincipled. I think that Shvabrin was so afraid of losing his priceless life that he could not understand that he was actually a dead person.

For me, honor and dignity are not empty words. It's too early to say that I live by honor. But I hope that these concepts will always serve as a life guide for me.

In our cruel age it seems that the concepts of honor and dishonor have died. There is no special need to keep girls honored - striptease and viciousness are paid dearly, and money is much more attractive than some kind of ephemeral honor. I remember Knurov from A.N. Ostrovsky's "Dowry":

There are limits beyond which condemnation does not go: I can offer you such an enormous content that the most malicious critics of someone else's morality will have to be silent and gape in surprise.

Sometimes it seems that men have not dreamed for a long time to serve for the good of the Fatherland, to protect their honor and dignity, to defend the Motherland. Probably, literature remains the only evidence of the existence of these concepts.

The most cherished work of A.S. Pushkin begins with the epigraph: “Take care of honor from a young age,” which is part of a Russian proverb. The whole novel "The Captain's Daughter" gives us the best idea of ​​honor and dishonor. The protagonist Petrusha Grinev is a young man, practically a youth (at the time of his departure for the service he was “eighteen” years old according to his mother), but he is filled with such determination that he is ready to die on the gallows, but not tarnish his honor. And this is not only because his father bequeathed him to serve in this way. Life without honor for a nobleman is the same as death. But his opponent and envious Shvabrin acts quite differently. His decision to go over to the side of Pugachev is determined by fear for his life. He, unlike Grinev, does not want to die. The outcome of the life of each of the characters is natural. Grinev lives a decent, albeit poor, life as a landowner and dies surrounded by his children and grandchildren. And the fate of Alexei Shvabrin is understandable, although Pushkin does not say anything about it, but most likely death or hard labor will cut short this unworthy life of a traitor, a man who has not preserved his honor.

War is the catalyst for the most important human qualities, she shows either courage and courage, or meanness and cowardice. We can find proof of this in V. Bykov's story "Sotnikov". Two heroes - moral poles storytelling. The fisherman is energetic, strong, physically strong, but is he courageous? Having been captured, he, under pain of death, betrays his partisan detachment, gives out its deployment, weapons, strength - in a word, everything in order to eliminate this center of resistance to the Nazis. But the frail, sickly, frail Sotnikov turns out to be courageous, endures torture, and resolutely ascends the scaffold, not for a second doubting the correctness of his act. He knows that death is not as terrible as remorse from betrayal. At the end of the story, Rybak, who escaped death, tries to hang himself in the toilet, but cannot, because he does not find a suitable tool (the belt was taken from him during his arrest). His death is a matter of time, he is not a completely fallen sinner, and living with such a burden is unbearable.

Years pass in historical memory Humanity still has examples of actions in honor and conscience. Will they become an example for my contemporaries? I think yes. The heroes who died in Syria, rescuing people in fires, in disasters, prove that there is honor, dignity, and there are bearers of these noble qualities.

First of all, these are not words, but deeds. You can say a thousand times that you are honest, kind and noble, but in fact be a lying villain. Real honor rarely goes along with grandiloquent speeches. You don't have to flaunt your good deeds to be a noble person. Honor does not require gratitude and recognition. People who have this quality in the first place help just like that, without expecting anything in return. For real noble man pays no attention to public opinion but lives according to laws and conscience. For him, this is above all. Although, of course, an insult to honor was not left unanswered: earlier conflicts related to humiliation of dignity were resolved by a duel. And here public opinion already had some weight, but this was in the past and more often happened to young, impulsive people.

Very subtle and romantic natures. Older and more experienced people, or simply those with a cold and prudent mind, rarely found themselves in such situations, as they were guided by the wisdom of the past years, and the disillusionment with society that was established in some souls made them take less and less into account the opinions of others. Of course, if they received a challenge, then, as noble personalities, they were obliged to accept it, otherwise the titles of cowards and scoundrels would be assigned to them, but not a single person betrayed any significance to the duel itself. All this concerns personal honor, but when the dignity of a weaker one, a woman, relatives, was hurt, it was defended by them until last drop blood. But, as already mentioned, this is all in the past. But what is real? Duels have long gone from life, principled and truthful people are becoming less and less. What is the place of honor in today's society? Perhaps nobility is still important, although it is not easy to see it behind a lot of masks. True, maybe not always, but it triumphs. They also protect the weak, even to their own detriment. And to this day, they look not only at the words of a person, but also at his deeds. And those who follow important rule, expressed by the ancient Greek philosopher Theophrastus: “Neither by vanity, nor by the beauty of clothes or horses, nor by adornment, gain honor for yourself, but by courage and wisdom.”

And what about dishonor? This is the complete opposite of everything noble. Unfortunately, there were many people with unclean thoughts at all times. Sweet are the speeches of dishonor; it easily drags you into its nets. He has many faces, but the main ones are lies and betrayal. A dishonest person cannot be truthful. It is always accompanied by deceit. Dishonest people will never help just like that, without benefit to themselves. They don't keep their promises. Loyalty to the word, ideals means nothing to them. It so happens that dishonorable people trying to appear principled and noble. They say beautiful speeches, create the appearance of good deeds, and at the first opportunity break all the words and vows. Such individuals are inherently cowardly and insignificant. But a large number of them are dangerous. Dishonor is like a plague that must be fought.

Many books have been written about honor. Many great writers have been concerned with this question. Who has not written about him! It is one of the most numerous and important topics in literature. The question of honor has occupied people at all times.

The story of A.S. Pushkin's "The Captain's Daughter" is a work of honor and nobility. Many heroes are living embodiments of these qualities, but there are those to whom they are alien. Pyotr Grinev is a young officer who came to serve in Belogorsk fortress. Throughout the entire work, he grew spiritually and made noble deeds. Grinev, despite the ban, challenged Shvabrin to a duel, defending the honor of Masha Mironova. The young man did not flinch when Pugachev came to the fortress. Grinev refused to go over to his side, despite the generous offers of high positions. No wonder the father of the young man said: "Take care of the dress again, and honor from a young age." Grinev followed this precept stoically and rigorously.

His antagonist is Shvabrin. He is selfish and selfish. This man spread false rumors about Masha Mironova only because he could not achieve her love. And then he kept the girl in captivity, forcing her to become his wife. Shvabrin, when the fortress was taken, went over to the side of Pugachev and kowtowed before him in every possible way. Having violated the oath, the hero gives the honor of an officer and shows his cowardice and inability to be true to his once given word.

The poem by A.S. Pushkin raises the issue of honor in episodes related to the duel. Lensky, out of his vehemence, challenges Onegin to a duel, offended by Yevgeny's behavior at the ball. Refuse main character can not. The duel took place - the ending is tragic. Onegin, of course, acts dishonestly towards his friend, but nevertheless he does it not intentionally, but by accident, and strongly reproaches himself. Perhaps if Lensky had been less ardent, the tragedy could have been avoided.

As another example, I offer the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov "A Hero of Our Time". Pechorin, main character, an individualist who enjoys playing on the feelings of others, but, despite this, is honest in his own way. He, knowing that the duel imposed on him was initially losing, accepted it early, defending the honor of Princess Mary. Pechorin gives Grushnitsky the opportunity to retract his words and stop the duel, but he turns out to be too weak and insignificant to admit to deceit and accept defeat.

So the honor is great importance. This is the nobility of man and his moral foundations. Without honest people society cannot exist. They are his strength and support. Only with their help can society flourish. Therefore, it is very important that there always be people who have a moral code, live according to their conscience and by doing this they make the world a better place.