Edward hopper works. One Story America: Edward Hopper

There is such a catchy painting that catches the viewer instantly. There is no bewilderment, alertness, everything seems to be clear right away, as in love at first sight. It is not surprising that careful scrutiny, reflection and empathy can damage such love. Is it possible to find something deep, solid there, behind the external brilliance? Is not a fact.

Take, for example, the most fashionable for the second hundred years of impressionism. Probably, for today's mass audience there is no more popular trend in the history of painting. However, as an artistic direction, impressionism turned out to be surprisingly transient, having existed in its pure form for a short twenty years. Its founding fathers eventually abandoned their brainchild, feeling the exhaustion of ideas and methods. Renoir returned to the classical forms of Ingres, and Monet stepped forward to abstractionism.

The opposite also happens. The paintings are modest and unpretentious, the motives are ordinary, and the techniques are traditional. Here is a house by the road, here is a girl at the window, but in general a banal gas station. No atmosphere, no lighting effects, no romantic passions. If you shrug your shoulders and move on, then everything will remain so. And if you stop and look, you will find an abyss.

Such is the painting of Edward Hopper, one of the most famous American artists of the twentieth century.

Not noticing Europe

Hopper's biography contains almost no bright events and unexpected twists. He studied, went to Paris, worked, got married, continued to work, received recognition ... No throwing, scandals, divorces, alcoholism, outrageous antics - nothing "fried" for the yellow press. In this, Hopper's life story is similar to his paintings: outwardly everything is simple, even calm, but in the depths there is a dramatic tension.

Already in childhood, he discovered the ability to draw, in which his parents supported him in every possible way. After school, he studied illustration by correspondence for a year, and then entered the prestigious New York Art School. American sources cite a whole list of his famous fellow students, but their names say almost nothing to the Russian audience. With the exception of Rockwell Kent, they all remained artists of national importance.

In 1906, Hopper finished his studies and began working as an illustrator in an advertising agency, but in the fall he went to Europe.

I must say that a trip to Europe was almost an obligatory part vocational education for American artists. At that time, the star of Paris was shining brightly, and young and ambitious people were drawn there from all over the world to join the latest achievements and trends in world painting.

It is surprising how different the consequences of this brewing in an international cauldron. Some, like the Spaniard Picasso, quickly turned from students into leaders and themselves became trendsetters in artistic fashion. Others always remained imitators, however talented, like Mary Cassatt and James Abbot McNeil Whistler. Still others, such as Russian artists, returned to their homeland, infected and charged with the spirit new art, and already at home they paved the way from the backyards of world art to its avant-garde.

Hopper was the most original of all. He traveled around Europe, was in Paris, London, Amsterdam, returned to New York, again traveled to Paris and Spain, spent time in European museums and met European artists ... But, apart from short-term influences, his painting does not reveal anything familiarity with modern trends. Nothing at all, even the palette just barely brightened up!

He appreciated Rembrandt and Hals, later - El Greco, from the masters close in time - Edouard Manet and Edgar Degas, who had already become classics by that time. As for Picasso, Hopper quite seriously claimed that he had not heard his name while in Paris.

It's hard to believe, but the fact remains. The post-impressionists had just passed away, the fauvists and cubists were already breaking their spears, futurism loomed on the horizon, painting broke away from the image of the visible and focused on the problems and limitations of the picture plane, Picasso and Matisse shone. But Hopper, being in the thick of things, didn't seem to see it.

And after 1910 he never crossed the Atlantic, even when his paintings were exhibited in the American pavilion of the prestigious Venice Biennale.

Artist at work

In 1913, Hopper settled in New York on Washington Square, where he lived and worked for more than fifty years - until the end of his days. In the same year, he sold his first painting, exhibited at the famous Armory Show in New York. It seemed that the career begins promisingly and success is not far off.

It didn't turn out so rosy. "Armory Show" was conceived as the first exhibition in the United States contemporary art and as such has been a resounding success. She turned the eyes of amateurs, critics and artists away from realism and turned them towards the avant-garde, although accompanied by ridicule and scandals. Against the background of Duchamp, Picasso, Picabia, Brancusi, Braque, Hopper's realism looked provincial and outdated. America decided that it was necessary to catch up with Europe, wealthy collectors became interested in overseas art, and single sales of domestic works did not make a difference.

Hopper worked as a commercial illustrator for many years. He even abandoned painting and devoted himself to etching, a technique at that time more suitable for printing reproduction. He was not in the service, worked part-time with magazine orders and experienced all the hardships of this position, at times even falling into depression.

However, in what was then New York, there was a patroness of the arts who decided to collect the works of American artists specifically - Gertrude Whitney, daughter of the millionaire Vanderbilt; by the way, the one with whom the cannibal Ellochka unsuccessfully competed, bartering a tea strainer from Ostap Bender for one of the twelve chairs.

Night shadows.

Subsequently, Whitney tried to donate her collection of contemporary American artists to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, but his management did not consider the gift worthy. The rejected collector, in retaliation, founded her own museum nearby, which is still considered best museum American art.

Evening wind. 1921 Museum of American Art, New York

But that's in the future. While Hopper was visiting the Whitney Studio, where in 1920 he had his first solo exhibition - 16 paintings. Some of his etchings also attracted the attention of the public, in particular "Night Shadows" and "Evening Wind". But he could not yet become a freelance artist and continued to earn money by illustration.

Family and recognition

In 1923 Hopper met his future wife Josephine. Their family was strong, but family life difficult. Jo forbade her husband to paint nudes and, if necessary, posed for herself. Edward was jealous of her even for the cat. Everything was aggravated by his taciturnity and gloomy character. “Sometimes talking to Eddie was like throwing a stone down a well. With one exception: the sound of falling into the water could not be heard, ”she admitted.

Edward and Joe Hopper. 1933

Nevertheless, it was Jo who reminded Hopper of the possibilities of watercolor, and he returned to this technique. He soon exhibited six works at the Brooklyn Museum, and one of them was bought by the museum for $100. Critics reacted kindly to the exhibition and noted the vitality and expressiveness of Hopper's watercolors, even with the most modest subjects. This combination of external restraint and expressive depth would become Hopper's trademark for the rest of the years.

In 1927, Hopper sold the painting “Two in auditorium” for $ 1,500, and with this money the couple got their first car. The artist got the opportunity to go on sketches, and rural provincial America for a long time became one of the main motives for his painting.

Two in the auditorium. 1927. Museum of Art, Toledo

In 1930 another important event took place in the life of the artist. Philanthropist Stephen Clark donated his painting "Railway House" to New York's Museum of Modern Art, and it has hung prominently there ever since.

So, shortly before his fiftieth birthday, Hopper entered the time of recognition. In 1931 he sold 30 works, including 13 watercolors. In 1932 he took part in the first regular exhibition of the Whitney Museum and did not miss the next until his death. In 1933, in honor of the artist's anniversary, the Museum of Modern Art presented a retrospective of his work.

For the next thirty years of his life, Hopper worked fruitfully, despite health problems that arose in old age. Jo survived him by ten months and bequeathed the entire family collection to the Whitney Museum.

Midnighters. 1942. Institute of Arts, Chicago

In the years of maturity, the artist created many recognized masterpieces, such as "Early Sunday Morning", "Night Owls", "Office in New York", "People in the Sun". During this time, he received many awards, traveled to Canada and Mexico, was presented at several retrospective and solo exhibitions.

Surveillance Protection

It cannot be said that all these years his painting did not develop. Nevertheless, Hopper found his favorite themes and images early, and if anything has changed, it is the credibility of their embodiment.

If one were to find a short formula for Hopper's work, it would be "alienation and isolation." Where are his characters going? Why are they frozen in the middle of the day? What prevents them from starting a dialogue, reaching out to each other, calling out and responding? There is no answer, and, to be honest, there are almost no questions, at least for them. This is how they are, this is the life, this is the world that separates people with invisible barriers.

This invisibility of barriers seriously worried Hopper, which is why there are so many windows in his paintings. Glass is a visual link, but a physical barrier. His heroes and heroines, seen from the street, seem to be open to the world, but in fact they are closed, immersed in themselves - take a look at Night Owls or The Office in New York. Such duality gives rise to a poignant combination of fragile vulnerability and stubborn inaccessibility, even impregnability.

If, on the contrary, we, together with the characters, look out through the glass, then the window again deceives, only teasing with the possibility of seeing something. Best case scenario external world only indicated by an array of trees or buildings, and often nothing is visible in the window, as, for example, in “Evening Wind” or in the painting “Automat”.

automat. 1927. Arts Center, Des Moines. USA

In general, Hopper's windows and doors are characterized by the same combination of openness and closeness as for animated characters. Slightly ajar sashes, swaying curtains, closed blinds, half-closed doors roam from picture to picture.

Transparent is impenetrable, and what should unite separates. Hence the constant feeling of mystery, understatement, failed contact.

Loneliness among people, in a big city, in front of everyone, has become a cross-cutting theme of the art of the 20th century, only here, with Hopper, it’s not the loneliness where they run from, but where they are saved. The closeness of his characters is felt as a natural form of self-defense, and not as a whim or trait of character. The light pouring on them is painfully merciless and they are too openly put on public display, and some kind of indifferent threat lurks in the world around them. Therefore, instead of external barriers, it is necessary to build internal ones.

Of course, if the walls in the office are destroyed, then work efficiency will increase, because in front of each other, and even more so of the boss, people are less distracted and chatting. But when everyone is under surveillance, communication stops and silence becomes the only form of defense. The heroes are restrained, instincts are suppressed, passions are driven deep - civilized, cultured people in the protective armor of external propriety.

Attention beyond

Very often, Hopper's paintings give the impression of a stopped moment. And this despite the fact that in the picture itself the movement is not indicated at all. But it is perceived as a film frame that has just replaced the previous one and is ready to give way to the next one. It is no coincidence that Hopper was so appreciated by American filmmakers, in particular Hitchcock, and Hollywood standards for framing a frame were largely formed taking into account his influence.

It was natural for the artist to direct the viewer's attention not so much to the depicted moment as to the imaginary events that preceded or followed it. This skill, rare in the history of painting, paradoxically combined the achievements of impressionism, with its heightened attention to the moment, and post-impressionism, which wanted to compress the passage of time into a momentary artistic image.

Hopper really succeeded in firmly pinning an elusive moment of being to the canvas and at the same time hinting at the incessant flow of time that brought him to the surface and immediately takes him into the dark depths of the past. If futurism tried to depict movement directly on the picturesque plane, then Hopper takes it out of the boundaries of painting, but leaves it within the limits of our perception. We don't see it, but we feel it.

In the same way, the artist manages to redirect our attention beyond the picture, not only in time, but also in space. The characters are looking somewhere outside, the viewer’s gaze is drawn there by the highway flying past the gas station, and on railway the eye manages to catch only the last car of the train. And more often he is no longer there, the train rushed by, and we involuntarily and unsuccessfully slip out with our eyes after him along the rails.

This is America as it is - no longing for the lost, no glorification of progress. But if it were only America, then Hopper would not have fallen to the lot of world fame, just as many of his contemporaries of no worse skill did not get it. In fact, Hopper managed to touch upon universal feelings, using national material. He paved the way for international recognition American painting, although it was brought to the leading roles in world art post-war artists, not recognized by Hopper himself.

His path is unique. In the turbulent world of vibrant artistic movements, he managed not to succumb to anyone's influence and to walk along the narrow path between romanticism and social criticism, between the avant-garde obsession with concepts and the deliberate naturalism of precisionism and hyperrealism, remaining true to himself to the end.

The American artist Edward Hopper is considered by some to be an urbanist, others as a representative of magical realism, and some are a forerunner of pop art. Fans of Hopper's work enthusiastically call him "a dreamer without illusions" and "a poet of empty spaces." All opinions are united by Hopper's dramatic canvas called "Night Owls". It is recognizable as Leonardo Da Vinci's Mona Lisa, Edvard Munch's The Scream or Coolidge's Dogs Playing Poker. The incredible popularity of this work has put him among the icons of pop culture.

(Edward Hopper , 1882-1967) was a prominent representative of the American genre painting XX century. And, although it was during this period that new trends in art were born, he remained indifferent to the avant-garde changes and experiments of his colleagues. Contemporaries who kept pace with fashion were fond of cubism, surrealism and abstract art, and Hopper's painting was considered boring and conservative. Edward suffered, but did not change his ideals: “ How can they not understand: the originality of the artist is not ingenuity and not a method, especially not a fashionable method, it is the quintessence of personality ».

And the personality of Edward Hopper was very complex. And very closed. And to such an extent that after his death, perhaps the only source of information about his life and character was the diary of his wife. In one of the interviews, she said:

One day, a New Yorker magazine employee tried to write an essay on Edward's life. And I couldn't. There was no material. Nothing to write about. His real biography I could only write. And it would be pure Dostoevsky« .

So he was from childhood, although the boy grew up in a good family of the owner of a haberdashery shop in the town of Nyack (New York). The family was no stranger to art: on weekends, father, mother and children sometimes came to New York to visit art exhibitions or go to the theatre. The boy secretly wrote down his impressions in a thick notebook. A lot of things were hidden there from adults. In particular, his experiences and resentments, when at the age of 12 he suddenly grew 30 cm over the summer and began to look terribly awkward and lanky. Classmates at every turn mocked and teased him about this. Perhaps from this unfortunate incident, Edward Hopper forever retained painful shyness, isolation and silence. His wife wrote in her diary: Saying anything to Ed is like throwing a rock down a bottomless well. Can't hear the splash «.

Naturally, this was reflected in the style of his paintings. Hopper liked to paint lifeless interiors and desert landscapes: railway cul-de-sacs leading to nowhere, deserted cafes, in which loneliness comes through. Window openings were a constant leitmotif of his work. The artist, as it were, was looking for a way out of his closed world. Or, perhaps, he secretly opened the entrance to himself: the sunlight falling through the windows into the rooms slightly warmed the cold of Hopper's ascetic paintings. We can say that against the background of his gloomy landscapes and interiors, the sun's rays on his canvases exactly embody the metaphor " a ray of light in a dark realm «.

But mostly, Hopper depicted loneliness in his paintings. Hopper's even sunsets, streets and houses are lonely. Couples depicted on his canvases look no less lonely, especially couples. Mutual discontent and alienation between a man and a woman is a constant theme of Edward Hopper.

The topic had quite vital basis: in his fortieth year, Hopper married his peer Josephine Nivison, whom he had known since the New York art school. They revolved in the same circles, were connected by the same interests, had similar views on many things. But their family life was filled with all sorts of strife and scandals, sometimes reaching fights. According to the wife's diary, the rude husband was to blame for everything. At the same time, according to the recollections of acquaintances, it is clear that Jo herself was far from the ideal of the keeper of the family hearth. For example, when once her artist friends asked her: “ Which favorite dish Edward?” she said arrogantly, “ Don't you think that in our circle there is too much delicious food and too little good painting? Our favorite dish is a friendly tin of stewed beans.«.

Hopper's paintings of couples clearly depict the tragedy of his relationship with his wife. They lived suffering and torturing each other, and at the same time, they were inseparable. They were united by a love of French poetry, painting, theater and cinema - this was enough for them to stay together. Josephine was even a muse and the main model for Edward's paintings after 1923. In a couple of late visitors to the diner, depicted in his painting "Night Owls", the author once again clearly depicted himself and his wife, the alienation of the man and woman sitting next to each other is so obvious.

"Midnighters" (Nighthawks), 1942, Edward Hopper

By coincidence, it is the picture "Midnighters" became a cult work of art in the United States. (In the original it is called " Nighthawks", which can also be translated as " owls"). Edward Hopper painted Night Owls in 1942, just after the attack on Pearl Harbor. The event caused a feeling of oppression and anxiety throughout America. This explained the gloomy, diffused atmosphere of Hopper's canvas, where the visitors of the diner are lonely and thoughtful, the deserted street is lit by the dim light of a shop window, and a lifeless house serves as a background for everything. However, the author denied that he wanted to express some kind of depression. In his words, he perhaps unconsciously depicted loneliness in big city ».

In any case, Hopper's midnight cafe is a critical departure from the city cafes his counterparts have portrayed. Usually, these establishments always and everywhere carried a flair of romance and love. Vincent van Gogh, depicting a night cafe in Arles, did not use black paint at all, his people sit on an open terrace, and the sky, like a field of flowers, is strewn with stars.

« Night terrace cafe”, Arles, 1888, Vincent van Gogh

Is it possible to compare his motley palette with the coolness and stinginess of Hopper's colors? And, nevertheless, looking at the painting "Night Owls", it becomes clear that behind the emphasized conciseness of Hopper's writing lies an abyss of expressiveness. His silent characters, immersed in their own thoughts, seem to be participants in a drama on a stage flooded with deadly fluorescent light. The viewer is hypnotically influenced by the geometry of parallel lines, the even rhythm of the lifeless windows of the neighboring building, which is echoed by the seats along the bar counter, the contrast of massive stone walls and transparent fragile glass, behind which the figures of four people took refuge on an island of light ... It seems that the author deliberately locked them here, hiding from the indifferent darkness of the street - looking closely, you can see that there is not a single visible exit from the room.

The painting "Night owls" had a major impact on American culture. Postmodernists have used the painting for countless parodic remakes based on literature, film, and painting.

Allusions and parodies of this work by Edward Hopper are found in many paintings, films, books and songs. Tom Waits named one of his albums " Nighthawks at the Diner» — « Midnighters at the Diner". This canvas is one of the favorite works of director David Lynch. It also influenced the appearance of the city in the film by Ridley Scott "Blade Runner".

Inspired by Night Owls, Austrian artist Gottfried Helnwein made a famous remake called " Boulevard of broken dreams ". Instead of faceless characters, he placed 4 celebrities in the cosmic void of loneliness - Marilyn Monroe, Humphrey Bogart, Elvis Presley and James Dean. Thus hinting at how senselessly their lives and talents have sunk into the void prematurely: Presley died as a result of long-term use and abuse of alcohol and drugs; Marilyn died of an overdose of antidepressants; Bogart's death was also the result of alcohol abuse, and James Dean died in a tragic car accident.

Other spoof remake writers have used US iconic pieces from various art fields. First of all, the most popular - American cinema with its famous characters, comic book superheroes and world-famous stories. The gloomy style of black-and-white film noir perfectly matched the mood of Hopper's painting ( film noir ).

To be sure, watch the "cut" of frames from the noir films of the 40s, which are replaced by the song " Boulevard of broken dreams ". (In 2005, members of the Punk Green Day group stated that their second single received this title and related posters under the direct influence of Hopper's painting).

Also ironically, the remakes played on many other Hollywood fetishes.

star Wars
star Wars
The Simpsons
family guy
based on the cult comic The Adventures of Tintin

Superman and Batman
Zombie
remake on the theme of m / f "Dead Bride", directed by Tim Burton

Not escaped the fate of becoming parody remakes of Hopper's paintings are different popular shows and serials.

parody poster on the theme of the comedy television series "Seinfeld" (1989-1998)
parody poster on the theme of the crime series "C.S.I.: Crime Scene Investigation"

Of course, in the parodies, the closed space of the cafe was played up, emphasized by the author in his picture.

And the cold tones of the picture and the asceticism of the palette caused many jokers to associate with outer space.

All sorts of American clichés of the urban landscape were also in use.

Well, where there is a night street and there are no cops nearby, it is quite logical that a street graffiti bully Banksy may appear, however, here he is throwing plastic chairs into a cafe window.

You can still give hundreds of examples of ironic remakes of Edward Hopper's paintings, made on all sorts of topics. This is one of the most common internet memes. And such fertility only confirms that true masterpieces are not subject to time.

There are images that immediately and for a long time capture the viewer in their captivity - they are like mousetraps for the eyes. The simple mechanics of such pictures, invented in accordance with the theory of conditioned reflexes of academician Pavlov, is clearly visible in advertising or reporter photographs. In all directions, hooks of curiosity, lust, pain or compassion stick out of them - depending on the purpose of the image - the sale of washing powder or the collection of charitable funds. Having become accustomed to a stream of such pictures like a strong drug, one can overlook, miss, as insipid and empty, pictures of a different kind - real and alive (unlike the first ones, which only imitate life). They are not so beautiful, and certainly do not evoke typical unconditional emotions, they are unexpected and their message is doubtful. But only they can be called art, the illegal "stolen air" of Mandelstam.

In any field of art, there are artists who have created not only their own unique world, but also a system of vision of the surrounding reality, a method of transferring the phenomena of everyday life into the reality of a work of art - into the small eternity of a picture, film or book. One of these artists, who developed his own unique system of analytical vision and, so to speak, implanted his eyes to his followers, was Edward Hopper. Suffice it to say that many of the world's filmmakers, including Alfred Hitchcock and Wim Wenders, considered themselves indebted to him. In the world of photography, his influence can be seen in the examples of Stephen Shore, Joel Meyerowitz, Philip-Lorca diCorcia: the list goes on. It seems that echoes of Hopper's "detached look" can be seen even in Andreas Gursky.

Before us is a whole layer of modern visual culture with its own special way of seeing the world. A view from above, a view from the side, a view of a (bored) passenger from the window of an electric train - half-empty substations, unfinished gestures of those waiting, indifferent wall surfaces, cryptograms of railway wires. It is hardly legitimate to compare paintings and photographs, but if it were allowed, then we would consider mythological concept"decisive moment" (Decisive Moment), introduced by Cartier-Bresson, on the example of Hopper's paintings. Hopper's photographic eye unmistakably highlights his "decisive moment". With all the imaginary chance, the movements of the characters in the paintings, the colors of the surrounding buildings and clouds are precisely coordinated with each other and subject to the identification of this “decisive moment”. True, this is a completely different moment than in the photographs of the famous Zen photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson. There it is the peak moment of the movement made by a person or an object; the moment when the situation being filmed reached its maximum expressiveness, which allows creating a picture characteristic of this particular moment in time with a clear and unambiguous plot, a kind of squeeze or quintessence of a “beautiful” moment that should be stopped at any cost. According to the precepts of Doctor Faust.

Philippe-Lorca di Corchia "Eddie Anderson"

In the premise of stopping a beautiful or terrible moment, modern journalistic narrative photography originates, and as a result, advertising photography. Both use the image only as an intermediary between the idea (product) and the consumer. In this system of concepts, the image becomes a clear text that does not allow any omissions or ambiguities. However, the secondary characters of magazine photographs are closer to me - they still do not know anything about the “decisive moment”.

The "decisive moment" in Hopper's paintings lags behind Bresson's by a few moments. The movement there has only just begun, and the gesture has not yet taken on a phase of certainty: we see its timid birth. And therefore - Hopper's painting is always a mystery, always a melancholic uncertainty, a miracle. We observe a timeless gap between moments, but the energy intensity of this moment is as great as in the creative void between the hand of Adam and the Creator in the Sistine Chapel. And if we talk about gestures, then the decisive gestures of God are rather Bressonian, and the unrevealed gestures of Adam are Hopperian. The first is a little “after”, the second is rather “before”.

The mystery of Hopper's paintings also lies in the fact that the actual actions of the characters, their "decisive moment", are only a hint at the true "decisive moment", which is already located outside the frame, outside the frame, at the imaginary point of convergence of many other intermediate "decisive moments". moments" paintings.

At first glance, Edward Hopper's paintings lack all the external attributes that can attract the viewer - the complexity of the compositional solution or the incredible color scheme. Monotonous colorful surfaces covered with sluggish strokes can be called boring. But unlike "normal" paintings, Hopper's work in an unknown way affects the very nerve of vision and leaves the viewer in thought for a long time. What is the mystery here?

Just as a bullet with a displaced center of gravity hits harder and more painfully, so in Hopper's paintings the semantic and compositional center of gravity is completely shifted into some kind of imaginary space outside the picture itself. And in this lies main riddle, and for this reason, the paintings become in some way the semantic negatives of ordinary paintings, built according to all the rules of pictorial art.

It is from this art space and a mysterious light streams, at which the inhabitants of the paintings look as if spellbound. What is it - the last rays of the setting sun, the light of a street lamp, or the light of an unattainable ideal?

Despite the deliberately realistic plots of the paintings and ascetic artistic techniques, the viewer is not left with a feeling of elusive reality. And it seems that Hopper deliberately slips the spectator a trick of visibility so that the spectator cannot discern the most important and essential behind the false moves. Isn't that what the reality around us does?

One of Hopper's most famous paintings is NightHawks. Before us is a panorama night street. A closed empty store, the dark windows of the building opposite, and on our side of the street - a showcase of a night cafe, or as they are called in New York - dive, in which there are four people - married couple, a lone man sipping his long drink, and a bartender ("Do you want it with or without ice?"). Oh no, of course I was wrong - a man in a hat that looks like Humphrey Bogart and a woman in a red blouse are not husband and wife. Rather, they are secret lovers, or ... Is the man on the left a mirror double of the first? Options multiply, a plot grows out of understatement, as happens during a walk around the city when looking into open windows eavesdropping on snatches of conversations. Unfinished movements, unclear meanings, indefinite colors. A performance that we watch not from the beginning and is unlikely to see its finale. At best, one of the actions. Bad actors and a bad director.

It’s as if we are peeping through a crack into someone else’s unremarkable life, but so far nothing is happening - but is it ordinary life so often something happens. I often imagine that someone from afar is watching my life - here I am sitting in an armchair, here I got up, poured tea - nothing more - they are probably yawning from boredom upstairs - there is no point or plot. But to create a plot, an external detached observer is simply needed, cutting off the superfluous and introducing additional meanings - this is how photographs and films are born. Rather, the internal logic of the images itself gives rise to the plot.

Edward Hopper. "Hotel Window"

Perhaps what we see in Hopper's paintings is just an imitation of reality. Perhaps this is the world of mannequins. A world from which life has been removed is like the creatures in the bottles of the Zoological Museum, or stuffed deer, from which only the outer shells remain. Sometimes Hopper's paintings frighten me with this monstrous emptiness, absolute vacuum that shines through every stroke. The path to absolute emptiness started by Black Square ended with Hotel Window. The only thing that does not allow us to call Hopper a complete nihilist is precisely this fantastic light from outside, these unfinished gestures of the characters, emphasizing the atmosphere of the mysterious expectation of the important event, which is not happening. It seems to me that Dino Buzzati and his "Tatar Desert" can be considered a literary analogue of Hopper's work. Throughout the novel, absolutely nothing happens, but the atmosphere of delayed action permeates the entire novel - and in anticipation of great events, you read the novel to the end, but nothing happens. Painting is much more concise than literature, and the whole novel can be illustrated by Hopper's painting "People in the Sun" alone.

Edward Hopper. "People in the Sun"

Hopper's paintings become a kind of evidence to the contrary - this is how medieval philosophers tried to determine the qualities of God. The presence of darkness itself proves the existence of light. Perhaps this is what Hopper is doing - showing a gray and boring world, he is only with this subtraction action negative qualities hints at the existence of other realities that cannot be reflected by the means available to painting. Or, in the words of Emil Cioran, "we cannot imagine eternity in any other way than to eliminate everything that happens, everything that is measurable for us."

And yet, Hopper's paintings are united by one plot not only within the framework of the artist's biography. In their sequence, they represent a series of images that a spying angel would see flying over the world, looking into the windows of office skyscrapers, entering houses invisible, spying on our unremarkable life. This is what America is like, seen through the eyes of an angel, with its endless roads, endless deserts, oceans, streets through which you can study the classical perspective. And the actors, a bit like mannequins from the nearest supermarket, a bit like people in their little loneliness in the middle of a big bright world, blown by all the winds.

Edward Hopper (Edward Hopper) art historians give different names. “Artist of empty spaces”, “poet of the era”, “gloomy socialist realist”. But whatever name you choose, it does not change the essence: Hopper is one of the brightest representatives American painting, whose works cannot leave anyone indifferent.

Gas station, 1940

The American creative method took shape during the Great Depression in the United States. Various researchers of Hopper's work tend to find in his works echoes with the writers Tennessee Williams, Theodore Dreiser, Robert Frost, Jerome Salinger, with the artists DeKirko and Delvaux, later they begin to see a reflection of his work in the film works of David Lynch ...

It is not known for certain whether any of these comparisons have a real basis, but one thing is clear: Edward Hopper very subtly managed to depict the spirit of the time, conveying it in the poses of heroes, in the empty spaces of his canvases, in a unique color scheme.

This is referred to as representatives of magical realism. Indeed, his characters, the environment in which he places them, is utterly simple in domestic plan. Nevertheless, his canvases always reflect some kind of understatement, always reflect a hidden conflict, give rise to the most various interpretations. Reaching, sometimes, to the point of absurdity. For example, his painting "Night Conference" was returned by the collector to the seller, because he saw in it a hidden communist conspiracy.

Evening meeting, 1949

Most famous painting Hopper - "Night owls". At one time, its reproduction hung in the room of almost every American teenager. The plot of the picture is extremely simple: in the window of a night cafe, three visitors are sitting at the bar counter, they are served by a bartender. It would seem that nothing remarkable, but anyone who looks at the picture of an American artist, almost physically feels the transcendent, aching feeling of the loneliness of a person in a big city.

Midnighters, 1942

Hopper's magical realism was not accepted by his contemporaries at the time. With a general trend towards more “interesting” methods - cubism, surrealism, abstractionism - his paintings seemed boring and inexpressive.
“They never understand Hopper said, that the originality of the artist is not a fashionable method. This is the quintessence of his personality.”

Today, his work is considered not just a milestone in American fine art, but a collective image, the spirit of his time. One of his biographers once wrote: “Descendants will learn more about that time from the paintings of Edward Hopper than from any textbook.” And, perhaps, in a sense, he is right.

Each national school painting can mark several of its best representatives. Just as Russian painting of the 20th century is impossible without Malevich, so is American painting without Edward Hopper . There are no revolutionary ideas and acute themes in his works, there are no conflicts and complex plots, however, all of them are permeated with a special atmosphere that we are not always able to feel in Everyday life. Hopper brought American painting to the world level. His followers were David Lynch and other later artists.

Childhood years and youth of the artist

Edward Hopper was born in 1882, in Nuascu. His family had an average income, and therefore was able to provide young Edward with a proper education. After moving to New York in 1899, he studied at the School of Advertising Artists and then entered the prestigious Robert Henry School. Parents were very supportive young artist and tried to develop his talent.

Trip to Europe

After graduation Edward Hopper worked only a year in the New York advertising agency and already in 1906 went to Europe. This trip was supposed to open to him the already well-known artists of other schools, to introduce him to Picasso, Manet, Rembrandt, El Greco, Degas and Hals.

Conventionally, all artists who have visited Europe or studied there can be divided into three categories. The first responded immediately to existing experience great masters and quickly conquered the whole world with their innovative style or the genius of their work. Of course, Picasso belongs to this category to a greater extent. Others, in effect own character or other reasons, remained unknown, although very talented artists. Still others (which is more applicable to Russian painters) took the acquired experience with them to their homeland and created their best works there.

However, already in this period, the isolation and originality of style inthe works of Edward Hopper. Unlike all young artists, he is not passionate about any new schools and techniques and takes everything quite calmly. Periodically, he returned to New York, then again went to Paris. Europe has not captured it entirely. However, it would be wrong to assume that such an attitude characterizes Hopper as an infantile or a person unable to fully appreciate the already existing brilliant artistic heritage of other masters. This is exactly the style of the artistEdward Hopper - inouter calm and tranquility, behind which there is always a deep meaning.

After Europe

As already mentioned, all the works of the masters were produced on Edward Hopper a vivid but short-lived impression. He quickly became interested in the technique and style of this or that author, but always returned to his own. Degas also admired him to the greatest extent. It can be said that their styles even echoed. But the works of Picasso, as Hopper himself said, he did not even notice. It is rather difficult to believe in such a fact, because Pablo Picasso was perhaps the most famous among artists. However, the fact remains.

After returning to New York, Hopper never left America.

Getting started on your own

The path of Edward Hopper, although it was not filled with dramas and sharply dissonant scandals, was still not easy.

In 1913, the artist returned to New York forever, settling in a house in Washington Square. The beginning of a career seems to be going well - the firstpainting by Edward Hopperwas sold in the same 1913. However, this success temporarily ends. Hopper first showed his work at the Armory Show in New York, which was conceived as an exhibition of contemporary art. Here Edward Hopper's style played with it bad joke- against the backdrop of avant-garde paintings by Picasso, Picabia and other painters, Hopper's paintings looked quite modest and even provincial. His idea was not understood by his contemporaries.Paintings by Edward Hopperwere perceived by both critics and viewers as ordinary realism, not carrying any artistic value. This is how the quiet period begins. Hopper is experiencing financial difficulties, so he is forced to take the position of an illustrator.

Before recognition

Experiencing the hardships of the situation, Edward Hopper takes on private orders for commercial publications. For a while, the artist even leaves painting and works in the technique of etching - engraving, which is performed mainly on a metal surface. In the 1910s, it was etching that was most adapted to printing activities. Hopper had never been in the service, so he had to work with great diligence. In addition, this situation also affected his health - often the artist fell into severe depression.

Based on this, it can be assumed that Edward Hopper, as a painter, could lose his skills during the years that he did not paint. But, fortunately, this did not happen.

Return after "silence"

Like any talent, Edward Hopper needed help. And in 1920, the artist was lucky enough to meet a certain Gertrude Whitney, a very wealthy woman who was very interested in art. She was the daughter of the then famous millionaire Vanderbilt, so she could afford to be a patron of the arts. So, Gertrude Whitney wanted to collect the work of American artists and, of course, help them and provide conditions for work.

So, in 1920, she organized for Edward Hopper his first exhibition. Now the public reacted to his work with great interest. Suchpaintings by Edward Hopper,like "Evening Wind" and "Night Shadows", as well as some of his etchings.

However, it was not yet a resounding success. And Hopper's financial situation hardly improved, so he was forced to continue working as an illustrator.

Long-awaited recognition

After several years of "silence" Edward Hopper still returns to painting. He has hope that his talent will be appreciated.

In 1923, Hopper marries Josephine Verstiel, a young artist. Their family life was quite difficult - Jo was jealous of her husband and even forbade him to draw nude female nature. However, such details of personal life are not significant for us. Interestingly, it was Jo who advised Hopper to try his hand at watercolor. And, we must pay tribute, this style led him to success.

The second exhibition was organized at the Brooklyn Museum. Six works by Edward Hopper were presented here. The museum acquired one of the paintings for its exposition. This a starting point creative upsurge in the life of the artist.

Formation of style

It was during the period when Edward Hopper chose watercolor as his main technique that his painting finally crystallized. own style. Hopper's paintings always show completely simple situations - people in their natural form, in ordinary cities. However, behind each such plot lies a subtle psychological picture that reflects deep feelings and states of mind.

For example, Night Owls by Edward Hopperat first glance, they may seem too simple - just a night cafe, a waiter and three visitors. However, this picture has two stories. According to one version, "Night owls" appeared as a result of impressions from Van Gogh's "Night Café in Arles". And according to another version, the plot was a reflection of E. Hemingway's story "The Killers". Shot in 1946, the film "The Killers" is rightfully considered the personification of not only literary source, but also the style of Hopper's painting. It is important to note that"Nighthawks" by Edward Hopper(referred to as "Midnighters") largely influenced the style of another artist - David Lynch.

At the same time, Hopper does not abandon the technique of etching. Although he no longer experienced financial difficulties, he continued to create engravings. Of course, this genre also influenced the master's painting. A peculiar combination of techniques found a place in many of his works.

Confession

Since 1930, Hopper's success has become irreversible. His works are gaining more and more popularity and are present in the expositions of almost all museums in America. In 1931 alone, about 30 of his paintings were sold. Two years later, the New York Museum hosts his solo exhibition. With the improvement of the material condition, Hopper's style is also transformed. He has the opportunity to travel outside the city and paint landscapes. So, in addition to the city, the artist begins to paint small houses and nature.

Style

In Hopper's works, the images seem to freeze, stop. All those details that are impossible to catch in everyday life, to assess their significance, become visible. This partly justifies the directors' interest in Hopper's paintings. His paintings can be viewed like the changing frames of a film.

Hopper's realism is very closely intertwined with symbolism. One of the tricks is open windows and doors as a display of ringing loneliness. To some extent, this symbolism reflected the state of mind of the author. The slightly ajar windows of the rooms, the doors to the cafe, where there is only one visitor, show one person among vast world. Many years spent alone in search of an opportunity to create left their mark on the artist's attitude. And in the pictures, the soul of a person is, as it were, open, on display, but no one notices it.

For example, you can look at Edward Hopper's painting "Reclining nude". The image of a naked girl seems to be saturated with apathy and silence. And the calm color scheme and the unsteadiness of watercolor emphasize this state of bliss and emptiness. A whole plot is being drawn mentally - a young woman in an empty room, immersed in her thoughts. This is another characteristic Hopper's works are an opportunity to imagine the situation, the circumstances that brought the heroes into just such an environment.

Glass became another important symbol in the master's paintings. The same "Midnighters" show us the characters through the cafe window. This move can be seen very often in Hopper's work. The loneliness of the characters is also expressed in this way. The inability or inability to start a conversation - this is the glass. It is transparent and sometimes even imperceptible, but still cold and strong. As a kind of barrier that isolates the heroes from the whole world. This can be seen in the paintings "Automatic", "Morning Sun", "Office in New York".

Modernity

Until the end of his life, Edward Hopper did not stop working. My last picture"Comedians" he created just two years before his death. The artist participated in all the exhibitions of Whitney Hall, a museum created by his patroness, Gertrude Whitney. In 2012, 8 short films dedicated to the artist were released. Any person, even a little familiar with his work, will say thatNighthawks by Edward Hopperthis is one of his most famous paintings. Reproductions of his works are now in demand all over the world, and the originals are highly valued. The uniqueness of his talent was still able to break through the avant-garde fashionable at that time, through critical views public, the hardships of an unemployed position. The paintings of Edward Hopper entered the history of painting as very thin psychological work conquering with its depth and unobtrusiveness.