In our time, when there has been a tendency to revise the established true concepts, well-known styles and genres, there is a need to take a slightly different perspective on one of the longest developing genres with an unusually rich tradition in the art of music, the suite. We consider the suite as an integral phenomenon, where each part, with all its self-sufficiency, plays an important dramatic role.

In most works, a new approach to the suite, overcoming the disparity in the perception of parts, can be traced through the example of individual cycles. Therefore, consideration of the semantic-dramatic unity of the suite in a broader context - at the level of many cycles of several national cultures- seems new and very relevant.

The goal of the dissertation work follows from the problem posed - to identify the invariant structure of the suite genre or its "structural-semantic invariant" (definition by M. Aranovsky). Aspectization of the research, indicated in the title of the dissertation, puts forward the following tasks:

Disclosure of the compositional features of suite cycles with subsequent generalization in a historical perspective; deciphering the logic of connecting the parts of the suite by identifying typological constants.

The material of the study is a “multiple object” (D. Likhachev’s definition): suites of the early 18th, 19th and 20th centuries, different in nationality (German, Russian, Norwegian) and personalities. The Western European suite is represented by the work of I.S. Bach, R. Schumann, E. Grieg, and the Russian suite - the works of M.I. Glinka, M.P. Mussorgsky, P.I. Tchaikovsky, A.P. Borodina, N.A. Rimsky-Korsakov, S.V. Rachmaninov, D.D. Shostakovich and G.V. Sviridov. The wide temporal and spatial framework of the study allows one to penetrate into the deep essence of the phenomenon, since, as M. Bakhtin’s statement, which has already become an aphorism, says, “... any entry into the sphere of meanings is made only through the gates of chronotopes” (101, p. 290).

The scientific knowledge about the suite is vast and multidimensional. At the present stage of development of musicology, it becomes very important to distinguish between external and internal forms (definitions by I. Barsova), analytical-grammatical and intonation (definitions by V. Medushevsky). As an analytical-grammatical form, as special kind The suite has received an excellent description in the studies of B. Asafiev (3,136,137), V. Bobrovsky (4,5,32), B. Yavorsky (27), in the works on the analysis of musical forms JI. Mazel (8), S. Skrebkov (18), I. Sposobina (21), V. Zukkerman (24.25).

The historical perspective of the study of the suite is widely covered both in domestic and foreign publications. V. Rabei (65), A. Petrash (55), I. Yampolsky (75), F. Blume (216), A. Milner (221) turn to her background. The essay by T. Norlind (223) presents the evolution of the lute suite of France, Italy and Germany from the beginning of the 16th to the middle of the 18th centuries. The author pays much attention to the process of formation of the main dance framework of the suite. G. Altman in the article "Dance Forms and Suite" (214) writes about the origin of the suite from peasant folk music. T. Baranova, analyzing the dance music of the Renaissance, believes that "... in addition to the ball with its traditional sequence of dances, ballet and a masquerade procession could serve as a prototype for an instrumental suite" (31, p. 34). The compositional and thematic features of the suites of the English virginalists are considered by T. Oganova in her dissertation research “English virginal music: problems of the formation of instrumental thinking” (175).

Suite cycle formation of the Baroque is covered in the works of T. Livanova (48.49), M. Druskin (36), K. Rosenshild (67). In the monograph "Musical form as a process" B. Asafiev (3) offers a comparative analysis

French, English and orchestral suites by J.S. Bach in order to show the various manifestations of contrast as the fundamental core of the suite composition. Of the foreign publications on the history of the German suite, one should single out the studies of K. Nef (222) and G. Riemann (224). G. Beck goes beyond one national-historical variety, offering a panorama of the development of the baroque suite in major European countries (215). At the same time, the author reveals specific features genre in different regions. He not only explores in detail the origins of the formation of the suite, but also makes a brief overview of the European suite of the 19th and 20th centuries. An analysis of the old and new romantic suite is presented in the works of JL Mazel (8), V. Bobrovsky (5), T. Popova (63). Questions of the theory and history of the genre are also touched upon in encyclopedic articles by I. Manukyan (9), Y. Neklyudov (12), D. Fuller (217).

In the historical review of personalities, works on the history of music, the history of pianoforte art, harmony, epistolary material and monographic publications were of great help, among which the monographs by D. Zhitomirsky "Robert Schumann" (195), O. Levasheva “M.I. Glinka" (197), V. Bryantseva "S.V. Rachmaninoff" (189).

If the analytic and grammatical form of the suite demonstrates a pronounced cyclic decentralization, then its internal, intonational form is fraught with a certain integrity, hidden behind external kaleidoscopicity and functioning in depth. The suite has its own “proto-dramaturgy”, which forms a stable semantic framework inherent in concrete historical varieties of the genre that are so dissimilar to each other (whether it is a Bach suite, a new romantic suite, or a suite by Rachmaninoff and Shostakovich). The list of musicological works shows that interest in this topic has always been present.

One of the first to experience the magnetic influence of this problem was B. Yavorsky. In "Bach Suites for Clavier" and (as it turned out thanks to the serious research of V. Nosina), in manuscripts, Yavorsky captures the most interesting factual material concerning both the onto- and phylogeny of the baroque suite. Through the most precise characteristics of the semantic roles of the parts, it makes it possible to reach the conceptual integrity of the suite, which allows us to consider its dramatic model in a broader historical and cultural context.

The next stage in the development of genre theory is represented by the research of T. Livanova. She offers the first theory in Russian musicology cyclic forms. T. Livanova emphasizes the historical aspect of the assessment of suite cycling (49). But an attempt to reveal the dramatic invariant of the suite leads to the context of "symphoniocentrism". As a result, the author states historical role the suites are merely the forerunners of the sonata-symphony cycle, thereby involuntarily extinguishing the proper quality of suite thinking.

Interest in the suite as a self-sufficient system became possible only when musicology mastered cultural method research. One of the notable phenomena of this kind was the article by M. Starcheus “ New life genre tradition” (22), which sheds new light on the problems of the genre. Returning us to the poetics of the Baroque era, the author discovers the principle of enfilade in the structure of the suite, and also focuses on the narrative nature of the genre. Developing M. Bakhtin's idea about the "memory of the genre", M. Starcheus emphasizes that in the perception of the suite, it is not so much the genre ensemble that is important as the author's modality (relation to specific genre signs). As a result, the suite - as a certain type of cultural integrity - begins to be filled with some kind of living content, a specific meaning inherent only to it. However, this meaning in the article is expressed in a very "hieroglyphic" way. The logic of the internal process of the suite remains a mystery, just as a certain internal mechanism of self-movement of the cycle, the dramatic “script” of the suite series, remains behind the scenes.

essential role in an attempt to decipher the immanent logos of the suite, the development of a functional approach to musical form played. V. Bobrovsky considers the connection of parts based on dramatic functions as the leading principle of cyclic forms (4). It is in the functional connection of the parts that the main difference between the suite and the sonata-symphony cycle lies. So, V. Zuckerman sees in the suite a manifestation of unity in plurality, and in the sonata-symphonic cycle - the plurality of unity. According to O. Sokolov, if the principle of subordination of parts operates in the sonata-symphonic cycle, then the suite corresponds to the principle of coordination of parts (20, p.34). V. Bobrovsky singles out a similar functional difference between them: “A suite is the union of a number of contrasting works, a sonata-symphony cycle, on the contrary, the division of a single work into a number of separate works subordinate to the whole (4, p. 181). M. Aranovsky also observes polar tendencies in the interpretation of the considered multi-part cycles: emphasized discreteness in the suite and internally overcome discreteness while maintaining its external features - in the symphony (1).

N. Pikalova, the author of a dissertation research on the theory of the suite, comes to the very important problem of integrating parts into a single musical organism: “The suite cycle differs significantly from the sonata-symphony one, however, not by the absence or insufficiency of unity, but rather by other principles of unity. The factor of unity itself is essential for the suite, because without it the multiplicity would be perceived as chaos, and not as an aesthetically justified diversity” (14, p. 51). N. Pikalova defines a suite as "...a complex genre based on a free multi-component cyclicity, expressed through contrasting parts (models of simple genres), coordinated by a generalizing artistic idea and collectively aimed at embodying the aesthetic value of the diversity of phenomena of reality" (p. 21- 22).

A truly "bestseller" in this area - the interpretation of a sequence of miniatures as a single musical organism - was V. Bobrovsky's article "Analysis of the composition of Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition" (32), published in 1976. Finding the principle of through development in the mode-intonation sphere, the author comes to the problem of the compositional unity of the cycle. This idea is further developed in the works of A. Merkulov on Schumann's suite cycles (53) and Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition (52), as well as in the article by E. Ruchyevskaya and N. Kuzmina "The Poem "Departed Rus'" in the context of Sviridov's author's style » (68). In Sviridov's cantata "Night Clouds", T. Maslovskaya observes a complex, "contrasting" relationship of parts, multifaceted connections between them (51). The tendency to perceive suite integrity at the level of modal-intonational and compositional unity opens up new horizons of research, providing an opportunity to touch upon its semantic-dramatic aspect. In this vein, considers children's album» Tchaikovsky A. Kandinsky-Rybnikov (45), relying on the author’s hidden subtext that, in his opinion, exists in the manuscript version of the work.

In general, modern literature on the suite is distinguished by a very diverse approach to the issue of content and compositional unity of the suite cycle. N. Pikalova sees the semantic core of the suite in the idea of ​​a contrasting set, and its artistic image - in the united set of givens. As a result, the suite is a "multiple series of self-valuable givens" (14, p. 62). V. Nosina, developing the ideas of A. Schweitzer, B. Yavorsky, M. Druskin on comparing the types of movement in the suite, believes that the main content of the suites is the analysis of movement: physics and mathematics” (13, p. 96). The genre of the suite, according to the author, provides "... a way of musical comprehension of the idea of ​​movement" (p. 95).

E. Shchelkanovtseva (26) traces the analogy between the six-part cyclic framework of the Suite for solo cello by I.S. Bach and oratory, which also has a clear division into six parts:

Exordium (introduction) - Prelude.

Narratio (narration) - Allemande.

Propositio (proposal) - Courant.

Confutatio (challenging, objection) - Sarabande.

Confirmatio (approval) - Plug-in dances.

Peroratio (conclusion) - Gigue.

A similar parallel, however, with the sonata-symphony cycle, is drawn by V. Rozhnovsky (17). He reveals the similarity of the four main sections of the construction of speech, distinguished in ancient and medieval rhetoric, with the four universal functions of thinking:

Givenness Narratio Homo agens Sonata Allegro

Derivative Propositio Homo sapiens Slow part

Negation Confutatio Homo ludens Minuet

Confirmatio Homo communius Final

According to V. Rozhnovsky, this quadrivium of functions and the main sections of speech construction reflect the universal laws of dialectics and, accordingly, form the conceptual basis of sonata-symphony dramaturgy, but not suite dramaturgy.

E. Shchelkanovtseva's interpretation of the parts of the suite itself is also very problematic and raises some doubts. Thus, the Confutatio section (contestation, objection) rather corresponds not to the sarabande, but to inserted dances, which form a sharp contrast not only in relation to the sarabande, but also to the main dance frame as a whole. In turn, the gigue, undoubtedly, being the final part, is functionally closer to both the Peroratio (conclusion) and Confirmatio (statement) sections.

For all its outward discreteness, dissection1, the suite has a dramatic integrity. As a single artistic organism, according to N. Pikalova, it is designed “... for the cumulative perception of parts in a certain sequence. Within the framework of the suite, only the entire cycle is a complete integrity” (14, p. 49). The concept of dramatic integrity is the prerogative of the inner form of the suite. I. Barsova writes: “To find an inner form means to single out something from the given, which contains the impulse for further transformation (99, p. 106). Exploring the internal structure of the musical genre, M. Aranovsky believes that it determines the immanence of the genre and ensures its stability over time: “The internal structure contains the “genetic code” of the genre, and the fulfillment of the conditions laid down in it ensures the reproduction of the genre in a new text” (2, p. .38).

Research methodology. The suite captivates with its unpredictability and imaginative diversity. Its immanent musical meaning is truly inexhaustible. The versatility of the genre also implies different ways of studying it. Our study proposes a semantic and dramatic analysis of the suite in a historical context. In essence, the historical approach is inseparable from the semantic-dramatic approach, since semantics, as M. Aranovsky emphasizes, is “... a historical phenomenon in the broadest sense of the word, including all aspects related to the specifics and development of culture” (98, p. 319). These two categories complement each other, form a single whole, allowing one to penetrate into the immanent nature of suite self-movement. The foundation for the semantic-dramatic analysis of the suite was:

Functional approach to the musical form of V. Bobrovsky (4);

Study of the structure of the musical genre by M. Aranovsky (2), as well as his "Theses on musical semantics" (98);

1 “The suite cycle has grown from a contrasting-composite form by bringing each of its parts to the level of an independent play” (19, p. 145).

Scientific developments in the theory of composition by B. Asafiev (3), E. Nazaykinsky (11), V. Medushevsky (10), JL Akopyan (97),

The initially chosen textual, semantic approach to the analysis of the suite allows reaching the level of perception of each individual cycle as an integral phenomenon. Further, the “productive” (definition by M. Aranovsky) simultaneous coverage of many suites contributes to the discovery of characteristic, typological features of the suite organization.

The suite is not limited by strict limits, rules; differs from the sonata-symphony cycle by freedom, ease of expression. Irrational by its nature, the suite is connected with the intuitive processes of unconscious thinking, and the code of the unconscious is myth1. Thus, the mentality of the suite provokes special structural norms of the organization, fixed by the mythological ritual.

The structural model of the suite approaches the mythological understanding of space, which, according to Yu. Lotman's description, is "... a set of individual objects that bear their own names" (88, p. 63). The beginning and end of the suite series are very arbitrary, like a mythological text, which is subject to cyclic temporal movement and is conceived as “... some continuously repeating device, synchronized with the cyclic processes of nature” (86, p. 224). But this is only an external analogy, behind which lies a deeper relationship between the two chronotopes: suite and mythological.

Analysis of the sequence of events in the myth allowed Y. Lotman to identify a single mythological invariant: life - death - resurrection (renewal). On a more abstract level, it looks like

1 In our study, we rely on the understanding of myth as a timeless category, as one of the constants of human psychology and thinking. This idea, first expressed in Russian literature by A. Losev and M. Bakhtin, has become extremely relevant in modern mythology (77,79,80,83,97,104,123,171). entry into a closed space1 - exit from it” (86, p. 232). This chain is open in both directions and can multiply infinitely.

Lotman rightly notes that this scheme is stable even in those cases when the direct connection with the world of myth is obviously cut off. On the ground modern culture texts appear that implement the archaic mechanism of myth-making. The mythic-ritual frame turns into something that the reader does not consciously feel and begins to function on a subconscious-intuitive, archetypal level.

The concept of archetype is closely connected with the semantics of the ritual, which actualizes the deepest meanings of existence. The essence of any ritual is the preservation of cosmic order. M. Evzlin believes that the ritual is “archetypal and in many respects similar to the archetypal one. Freeing people from confusion, depression, horror that arise at the time of the most acute crises that cannot be rationally resolved, softening the situation, the ritual allows you to return to your original sources, plunge into your “first infinity”, into your own depth. ”(81, p. 18).

In traditional ritualogy, the transformation of some crisis situation into a new one is interpreted as death - rebirth. Yu. Lotman relies on this scheme when describing the structure of mythological plots. So, the myth has a special type of action associated with the ritual triad basis.

How do the required constants of the mythological action and the compositional units of the suite series correlate with each other?

1. The initial dance couple in the suite corresponds to the binary opposition or mythologeme. It is a "bundle of functional relations" (the definition of K. Levi-Strauss), provoking the emergence of new oppositions on the principle of multiplication, synchronization of everything that exists, has

1 A closed space is a test in the form of illness, death, an initiation rite.

2 Mythologeme is a unit of myth, its "summary", formula, semantic and logical characteristics (83). layered "structure, vertical way of organization. The variant deployment of pair relations in the suite is identical.

2. In the course of dramatic development, a play appears, ambivalent in its semantics, in which the binary opposition is synchronized. It performs the function of mediation, mediation - a mechanism for removing oppositions, resolving fundamental contradictions. It is based on the archetype of giving birth to death, the most ancient mythology of "dying - resurrection". Without rationally explaining the mystery of life and death, myth introduces it through a mystically irrational understanding of death as a transition into another existence, into a new qualitative state.

3. The finale of the suite appears in the meaning of reintegration. This is a symbol of a new level, restoring the integrity of being; harmonization of personality and the world; "... a cathartic feeling of belonging. to the immortal harmony of the Universe" (77, p. 47).

K. Levi-Strauss (84) expresses the model of the mediative process by the following formula: fx(a) : fy(a) = fx(b) : f^y), where the term a is associated with the negative function X, and the term b acts as a mediator between X and a positive function y. Being an intermediary, a mediator, b can also take on the negative function X. The last term fa-i(y) means the annulment of the original state and some additional acquisition resulting from the spiral development. Thus, the mythological model in this formula is reflected through spatial and value inversion. E. Meletinsky projects this formula onto the situation fairy tale: “The initial negative situation - wrecking (x) of the antagonist (a) is overcome by the actions of the hero-mediator (b), capable of negative actions (x) directed at the antagonist (a) not only to neutralize the latter, but also to acquire additional fabulous values ​​in the form of a wonderful reward , marriage with a princess, etc. " (89, p. 87).

The key position of K. Kedrov's mythological and ritual research (82) is the idea of ​​"anthropic inversion", the meaning of which the author deciphers in the following statements:

Buried below, in the earth, will be in heaven. A prisoner in a narrow space will gain the entire universe” (82, p. 87).

In a night conversation, Christ tells Nicodemus that a person must be born twice: once from the flesh, the other from the spirit. Birth from the flesh leads to death, birth from the spirit leads to eternal life” (p. 90).

The folklore act about death and resurrection is the first word spoken by man in the universe. This is a pra-plot, it contains the genetic code of all world literature. Who suggested it to the man? The “genetic code” itself is nature itself” (p. 85).

K. Kedrov elevates the principle of "anthropic inversion" to the rank of a universal category, calling it a metacode. According to the author's definition, this is “... a system of symbols that reflects the unity of man and the cosmos, common for all times in all existing areas of culture. The main patterns of the metacode, its language are formed in the folklore period and remain indestructible throughout the development of literature. Metacode is a single code of being, penetrating the entire metauniverse” (p. 284). The metacode of "anthropic inversion" is aimed at the "deification" of a person through the symbolic "inside" of God, society, the cosmos, which ultimately establishes the harmony of a person and the cosmos, top and bottom, where a person is a "spiritualized cosmos" and the cosmos is a "spiritualized person".

The suite row, provided that it is perceived as an organic, cumulative whole, becomes a structure, moreover, a structure that embodies a certain model, in this case a mythological one. Based on this,

1 According to Yu. Lotman, “the structure is always a model” (113, p. 13). the main method on which the work is based, it is advisable to consider the structural method. “A feature of structural study,” writes Yu. Lotman in “Lectures on Structural Poetics,” is that it does not mean considering individual elements in their isolation or mechanical connection, but determining the relationship of elements to each other and their relationship to the structural whole” (117, p.18).

The defining feature of the structural method is its modeling nature. B. Gasparov deciphers this provision as follows. The process of scientific cognition is understood “as an imposition on the material of some initial conceptual apparatus, in the parameters of which this material is described. This apparatus of description is called a metalanguage. As a result, we are presented not with a direct reflection of the object, but with a certain interpretation of it, a certain aspect within the given parameters and in abstraction from countless other properties of it, that is, a model of this object” (105, p. 42). The statement of the modeling approach has an important consequence: “The research apparatus, separating from the object of description, being once built, gets in the future the possibility of application to other objects, that is, the possibility of universalization” (p. 43). With regard to the humanities, Yu. Lotman makes an important correction in the definition of this method, calling it structural-semiotic.

The work also uses stylistic, descriptive, comparative methods of analysis. Along with general scientific and musicological analytical techniques, the developments of a modern complex humanities, namely general art criticism, philosophy, literary criticism, mythology, ritualogy, cultural studies.

The scientific novelty of the study is determined by the mythological structuring of the immanent logic of the suite self-movement, the use of the methodology of mythoanalysis to substantiate the specifics of the genre archetype of the suite. Such a perspective allows revealing the integrity of suite compositions, as well as discovering new semantic dimensions of music of different cultures and styles using the suite as an example.

As a working hypothesis, the idea of ​​the semantic-dramatic unity of the suite for a variety of artistic manifestations, regardless of time, nationality and individuality of the composer, was put forward.

The complexity of this rather problematic issue dictates the need for a consistent consideration of it from two perspectives: theoretical and historical.

The first chapter includes the main theoretical provisions of the topic, the key terminological apparatus, focuses on the problem of the genre archetype. It was found in the clavier suites of J.S. Bach (French, English Suites and Partitas). The choice of the suites of this composer as a structural and semantic basis is explained not only by the fact that the flourishing of the baroque suite, where it received its ingenious embodiment, is connected with his clavier work, but also because among the elegant “fireworks” of the suites of the baroque era, it is in Bach’s cyclic formation that the a certain sequence of basic dances, which makes it possible to reveal the dramatic logic of suite self-movement.

The second and third chapters have a diachronic orientation. They are devoted not so much to the analysis of the most striking precedents of suites in music of the 19th and XX centuries, how much the desire to realize the dynamics of the development of the suite genre. Historical types suites are cultural and stylistic interpretations of its semantic core, which is what we are trying to consider in each individual essay.

In the era of classicism, the suite fades into the background. In the 19th century, its renaissance begins, it again finds itself at the forefront. V. Medushevsky associates such stylistic fluctuations with the dialogue of the right and left hemisphere vision of life. He notes that the variable dominance in the culture of the mechanisms of right and left hemisphere thinking is associated with reciprocal (mutual) inhibition, when each of the hemispheres slows down the other. The intonation side of the form is rooted in the right hemisphere. It performs simultaneous syntheses. The left hemisphere - analytical - is responsible for the awareness of temporal processes (10). The suite, with its inherent openness of form, variegation and plurality of equivalent elements, gravitates towards the right-brain mechanism of thinking that prevailed in the times of baroque and romanticism. Moreover, according to D. Kirnarskaya, “...according to the data of neuropsychology, the right hemisphere.is associated with the archaic and childish way of thinking, the roots of right hemisphere thinking go back to the most ancient layers of the mental. Speaking about the features of the right brain, neuropsychologists call it “myth-creating” and archaic” (108, p. 39).

The second chapter is devoted to the 19th century suite. The romantic suite is represented by the work of R. Schumann (first essay), without which it is completely unthinkable to consider this stylistic variety of the genre and, in general, the suite of the 19th century. Semantic and Dramaturgical Analysis of Some of the Composer's Cycles

Poet's Love”, “Children's Scenes”, “Forest Scenes”, “Carnival”, “Davidsbündler Dances”, “Humoresque”) reveals the characteristic features of his suite thinking.

Schumann's influence on the development of the 19th century suite is boundless. Continuity is clearly visible in Russian music. Among the works devoted to this problem, it is worth highlighting the articles by G. Golovinsky "Robert Schumann and Russian Music of the 19th Century" (153), M. Frolova "Tchaikovsky and Schumann" (182), an essay on Schumann by V. Konen (164). Schumann's suite creativity is not just one of the important sources that nourished the Russian suite, but its invisible spiritual companion, not only throughout the 19th, but also the 20th century.

The Russian suite of the 19th century, as a young genre, is of interest from the point of view of original forms of assimilation of Western European experience in the form of Schumann's new romantic suite. Having absorbed its influence, Russian composers very peculiarly implemented the logic of suite self-movement in their work. The suite principle of shaping is much closer to Russian culture than the sonata one. The lush, varied flowering of the Russian suite of the 19th century expands the analytical space in the structure of the dissertation research (features 2-7).

In the second essay, the vocal cycle “Farewell to St. Petersburg” by M.I. Glinka. The next two essays are devoted to the composers of the new Russian school represented by M.P. Mussorgsky, A.P. Borodin and N.A. Rimsky-Korsakov. The third essay analyzes the suite dramaturgy of Mussorgsky (“Pictures at an Exhibition”, “Songs and Dances of Death”) and Borodin (Little Suite for Piano). The fourth essay is about Rimsky-Korsakov's suites based on the fairy-tale story "Antar" and "Scheherazade".

The fifth and sixth essays present the composers of the Moscow school: the suite works of P.I. Tchaikovsky

The Seasons”, “Children's Album”, First, Second, Third Orchestral Suites, Serenade for String Orchestra, suite from the ballet The Nutcracker), and Suites for two pianos by S.V. Rachmaninov.

A strange turn at first glance in the seventh, final essay of the second chapter to the Norwegian suite "Peer Gynt" by E. Grieg, upon closer examination, turns out to be very logical. For all their originality and unique national image, the Peer Gynt suite cycles concentrated the experience of Western European and Russian cultures.

They are separated from Schumann's suites by a fairly significant time period, while in relation to individual Tchaikovsky suites,

Rimsky-Korsakov and Rachmaninoff, this phenomenon arose in parallel.

The three national-cultural traditions considered in the second chapter (German, Russian, Norwegian) have a lot in common and are interconnected by deep, archetypal roots.

The 20th century further expands the field for analysis. Respecting the framework of the dissertation research, in the third chapter it was necessary to make restrictions: spatial (Russian music) and temporal (1920-beginning

80s)1. The choice deliberately fell on the two largest figures in Russian music - these are the Teacher and the Student, D.D. Shostakovich and

G.V. Sviridov, composers with the opposite type of attitude:

Shostakovich - with a heightened sense of time, drama, and Sviridov - with an epic generalization of life's collisions, a sense of time as a category of the Eternal.

The eighth essay presents the evolution of Shostakovich's suite work:

Aphorisms”, “From Jewish Folk Poetry”, “Seven Poems by A. Blok”, “Six Poems by M. Tsvetaeva”, Suite for Bass and Piano to Words by Michelangelo.

The ninth essay analyzes the cycles of G.V. Sviridova:

Instrumental (Partitas for piano, Musical illustrations for the story by A.S. Pushkin "The Snowstorm");

Chamber-vocal ("Six poems to the words of A.S. Pushkin",

Songs to the words of R. Burns”, “Departed Rus'” to the words of S. Yesenin);

1 Chamber instrumental suite in Russian Soviet music 60s - the first half of the 80s was studied in the candidate's dissertation by N. Pikalova (14).

Choral ("Kursk songs",

Pushkin vein>, "Night Clouds",

Four choirs from the cycle "Songs of Timelessness", "Ladoga").

Sviridov's chamber-vocal and choral cycles can rightly be called suites, since, as analysis shows, they have the characteristic attributes of this genre.

The practical significance of the work. The results of the study can be used in courses in the history of music, the analysis of musical forms, the history of performing arts and in performing practice. The scientific provisions of the work can serve as a basis for further research in the field of the suite genre.

Approbation of the research results. The dissertation materials were repeatedly discussed at meetings of the Department of Music History of the Russian Academy of Music. Gnesins. They are stated in a number of publications, as well as in speeches at two scientific and practical conferences: “ Musical education in the context of culture”, RAM im. Gnesinykh, 1996 (report: "Mythological code as one of the methods of musicological analysis on the example of J.S. Bach's clavier suites"), a conference organized by the E. Grieg Society in the Russian Academy of Sciences. Gnesins, 1997 (report: “Suites “Peer Gynt” by E. Grieg”). These works were used in teaching practice in the course of the history of Russian and foreign music for students of foreign faculty. Lectures were given on the analysis of musical forms to teachers of the Department of Music Theory music school them. I.S. Palantay, Yoshkar-Ola, as well as students of the ITC faculty of the RAM. Gnesins.

Conclusion

Suite - historically developing phenomenon, cardiogram of the world-feeling, understanding of the world. Being a sign of the socio-cultural perception of the world, it has a mobile, flexible character; is enriched with new content, while acting in the most diverse grammatical roles. Composers of the 19th and 20th centuries responded intuitively universal principles suite formations that have developed in Baroque art.

Analysis of many suites of different eras, styles, national schools and personalium made it possible to reveal a structural-semantic invariant. It consists in the polyphonic conjugation of two types of thinking (conscious and unconscious, rational-discrete and continual-mythological), two forms (external and internal, analytic-grammatical and intonational), two cultures: the “Old” time, the unchanging (code of mythology) and "New", giving rise to historical varieties of the suite with a constant renewal of the genre and under the influence of the socio-cultural conditions of a particular era. How does the external, grammatical plot, a discrete series of self-valuable givens, change?

If the main frame of Bach's suites is represented by dances, then the genre image of the suites of the 19th and 20th centuries is undergoing significant changes. The rejection of the predominance of dance parts leads to the perception of the suite as a collection of genre and everyday signs of culture. For example, the genre kaleidoscope of “Pictures at an Exhibition” by Mussorgsky, “Children’s Album” by Tchaikovsky, “Peer Gynt” by Grieg, “Snowstorms” by Sviridov was born by the theme of wandering, and Tchaikovsky’s Orchestral Suites, “Aphorisms” by Shostakovich, Partita Sviridov are an excursion into the history of culture . The multiple series of diverse genre sketches in the cycles Farewell to Petersburg by Glinka, Songs and Dances of Death by Mussorgsky, From Jewish Folk Poetry by Shostakovich, and Songs to Words by R. Burns by Sviridov allow us to consider these compositions as vocal suites.

The figurative relations of the romantic suite of the 19th century go back to the ps and -chological poles of the introverted and extraverted

I * » I f g o. This dyad becomes the artistic dominant of Schumann's worldview, and in Tchaikovsky's The Four Seasons cycle it serves as the dramatic core of the composition. In the works of Rachmaninoff and Sviridov, it is refracted in a lyric-epic mode. Being the initial binary opposition, it gives rise to a special type of setting in suite dramaturgy, associated with the process of introversion (Tchaikovsky's Four Seasons, Rachmaninov's First Suite, Sviridov's Night Clouds).

The last three suites by D. Shostakovich are a new type of suite - confessional-monologic. Introverted and extroverted images flicker in a symbolic duality. A discrete series of self-valuable givens is genre abstracted: symbols, philosophical categories, lyrical revelations, reflection, meditative contemplation - all this reflects various psychological states, plunging both into the universal spheres of being and into the secrets of the subconscious, into the world of the unknown. In Sviridov's cycle "Departed Rus'", the confessional-monologic beginning appears under the powerful, majestic vault of the epic.

The suite is ontological in nature, in contrast to the "epistemology" of the sonata-symphonic cycle. In this perspective, the suite and the symphony are comprehended as two correlative categories. The dramaturgy of the final goal inherent in the sonata-symphony cycle presupposes development for the sake of the result. Its procedural-dynamic nature is associated with causality. Each functional stage is conditioned by the previous one and prepares the logic after-! blowing. Suite dramaturgy, with its mythological and ritual basis rooted in the universal constants of the sphere of the unconscious, is based on other relations: “In the mythological triadic structure, the last phase does not coincide with the category of dialectical synthesis. .Mythology is alien to the quality of self-development, qualitative growth from internal contradictions. The paradoxical reunion of differently directed principles occurs as a leap after a series of repetitions. Metamorphosis predominates over qualitative development; buildup and summation over synthesis and integration, repetition over dynamization, contrast over conflict” (83, p. 33).

Suite and symphony are two major conceptual genres that are based on diametrically opposed principles of worldview and their corresponding structural foundations: multi-centered - centered, open - closed, etc. Practically in all suites the same model operates with different variants. Let us consider the features of the three-stage dramaturgical development of the suite from a synchronic perspective.

The results of the analysis of suite cycles showed that one of the main types of binary structuring is the interaction of two forms of thinking: continual and discrete, serious and profaning, and, accordingly, two genre spheres: baroque and divertissement introduction and fugue (waltz, divertissement, prelude, overture ) march, intermezzo)

In the zone of mediation, there is a convergence of the initial binary opposition. “Knightly Romance” incorporates the figurative semantics of the first two numbers of the cycle - “Who is she and where is she” and “Jewish song” (Glinka “Farewell to Petersburg”), and in “Night chants” the semantic plot of “Songs about love” and "Balalaiki" (Sviridov "Ladoga"). In the chorus "The hour hand is approaching midnight", the close contact of the images of life and death gives rise to a tragic symbol of the passing time (Sviridov "Night Clouds"). The ultimate convergence of the real and the unreal, healthy and sick, life and death (Mussorgsky's "Songs and Dances of Death") in Shostakovich's suite "Six Poems by M. Tsvetaeva" leads to a dialogue with oneself, embodying the tragic situation of a split personality ("Hamlet's Dialogue with Conscience"). ").

Let us recall the examples of modal-intonational mediation:

Theme "Walks" in "Pictures at an Exhibition" by Mussorgsky;

The theme of "Truth" in Shostakovich's "Suite on the Words of Michelangelo";

The cis tone is a harmonic intermediary between the mediative parts "Winter" and "The Good Life" in Shostakovich's cycle "From Jewish Folk Poetry".

Let us list the characteristic signs of Schumann's mediation, which are very specifically refracted in the suites of Russian composers.

1. Romantic mediation is presented in two genres:

"Dreams"; barcarolle in Glinka's The Blues Fell Asleep ("Farewell to Petersburg"), in Borodin's "Dreams" ("Little Suite"), in Tchaikovsky's plays "June. Barcarolle (The Four Seasons) and Sweet Dream (Children's Album).

The lullaby reflects the ambivalent world of the real and the unreal, expressed in contrasting thematics - " Lullaby» Glinka (Farewell to Petersburg), Tchaikovsky's Dreams of a Child (Second Suite), Shostakovich's Lullaby (From Jewish Folk Poetry).

2. Carnival opposition of masculine and feminine in the festive atmosphere of the ball: two Mazurkas in Borodin's "Little Suite", Invétsia and Intermezzo in Sviridov's Partita e-moll.

3. The mythology of recognition in the works of Mussorgsky and Shostakovich is acutely social, angrily accusatory in nature (the final lines of “Songs and Dances of Death”; “The Poet and the Tsar” - “No, the drum beat” in the cycle “Six poems by M. Tsvetaeva”) . In the suite "Peer Gynt" by Grieg, she transfers the action from the ritual sphere to real world("The Return of Peer Gynt").

The way out of the "tunnel" is connected with the expansion of space, the sound universe through the gradual layering of voices, compaction of the texture. There is a "specialization" of time, that is, the translation of time into space, or immersion in the Eternal. In "Icon" (Sviridov's "Songs of Timelessness") - this is spiritual contemplation, in the code of the finale of "Scheherazade" by Rimsky-Korsakov - synchronization of the main thematic triad, personifying catharsis.

Open endings are written in variational form, often have a chorus-chorus structure. Endless movement is symbolized by the genres of fugue (Partita e-moll by Sviridov), tarantella (Rakhmaninov's Second Suite), as well as the image of the road (Glinka "Farewell to Petersburg", Sviridov "Cycle on the words of A. S. Pushkin" and "Snowstorm"). A peculiar sign of the "open" finale in the suites of the 20th century is the absence of a final cadenza:

Shostakovich "Immortality" ("Suite on the words of Michelangelo"), Sviridov "Beard" ("Ladoga").

Note that the mythological model is refracted not only in the context of the entire work, but also at the micro level, namely within the framework of the final movement (Tchaikovsky's Third Suite, Sviridov's "Night Clouds") and within individual microcycles:

Tchaikovsky "The Seasons" (in each microcycle), Tchaikovsky "Children's Album" (second microcycle),

Shostakovich "Aphorisms" (first microcycle), Sviridov "Departed Rus'" (first microcycle).

The plot-dramatic plot of the Russian suite reflects as a daily calendar myth (“Children’s Album” and “The Nutcracker” by Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov’s First Suite, “Aphorisms”, “Seven Poems by A. Blok” and “Suite on the Words of Michelangelo” by Shostakovich, “Pushkin’s Wreath” and "Night Clouds" by Sviridov), as well as annual ("The Four Seasons" by Tchaikovsky, "From Jewish Folk Poetry" by Shostakovich, "Snowstorm" by Sviridov).

An analysis of the suite dramaturgy of the 19th and 20th centuries shows that there are successive connections between the suites of Russian composers, semantic-co-dramatic overlaps. Let's give some examples.

1. The playful, conditionally theatrical world is associated with the differentiation of life and the stage, the distance of the author from the object (Tchaikovsky's Orchestral Suites; "Aphorisms", the final triad of the cycle "From Jewish Folk Poetry" by Shostakovich; "Balaganchik" from "Night Clouds" by Sviridov). The Maccabric line, which forms the dramatic basis of the Songs and Dances of Death, is continued in the second microcycle of the Aphorisms, as well as in the Song of Need (From Jewish Folk Poetry),

2. Cosmogonic dissolution in the universal, in the primordial element of nature, the cosmos (codes of the First and Second Suites of Tchaikovsky; the finals of Sviridov's cycles "Kursk Songs", "Pushkin's Wreath" and "Ladoga").

3. The image of the Motherland, bell-shaped Rus' in the finale (“Pictures at an Exhibition” by Mussorgsky, the First Suite by Rachmaninoff, Partita f-moll and “Departed Rus'” by Sviridov).

4. The image of the night in the final as peace, bliss, harmony of the Universe - a lyrical interpretation of the idea of ​​unity:

Borodin "Nocturne" ("Little Suite"), Shostakovich "Music" ("Seven Poems by A. Blok").

5. The motif of the feast:

Glinka. Finale "Farewell to St. Petersburg, Sviridov" Greek feast "(" Pushkin's wreath ").

6. The motive of farewell plays an important role in the cycle “Farewell to Petersburg” by Glinka and in the suite work of Sviridov:

Premonition ”(A cycle on the words of A.S. Pushkin),“ Farewell ”(“ Songs to the words of R. Burns ”).

In the cycle "Departed Rus'" ("Autumn Style"), a mournful lyrical farewell is connected with the tragic semantics of autumn as the end of a life's journey. In the mirror reprise of "The Snowstorm", the atmosphere of farewell creates the effect of gradual distancing, leaving. ♦*

Completion of this study, like any scientific work, is conditional. The attitude to the suite as an integral phenomenon highlighting a certain genre invariant is a rather problematic phenomenon and is still at the initial stage of development. Despite the fact that an invariant model is surprisingly revealed in the deep basis of suite dramaturgy, each suite captivates with its mysterious originality, sometimes completely unpredictable logic of development, which provides fertile ground for its further research. In order to identify the most general patterns of the semantic and dramatic development of the suite, we turned to artistic examples that were already established. Suite analysis in chronological order showed that the mechanism of myth-making also operates at the macro level, in the context of a certain era, making interesting additions to the musical characteristics of Russian culture of the 19th and 20th centuries, to its periodization.

Summarizing the results of the study, we outline its prospects. First of all, it is necessary to present a more complete picture of suite cycling in Russian music of the 19th and 20th centuries, expanding the circle of personalities, and pay special attention to the suite in modern music: what is the cyclical nature of the suite, and whether its semantic-dramatic basis is preserved in conditions when habitual genre formations are collapsing. The intra-genre typology of the modern suite, which is very diverse in stylistic terms, can open up new facets of studying the problem.

An extraordinarily interesting area of ​​analysis is the "theatrical" suites from ballets, from music to plays and films. We did not set ourselves the goal of exploring this huge analytical layer in detail, therefore this genre variety is represented in the work by only three works: Suite from the ballet The Nutcracker by Tchaikovsky, Suites by Grieg from the music for Ibsen's drama Peer Gynt, and Musical illustrations for Pushkin's story "Snowstorm" Sviridov.

Relying on the plot plot of a musical performance, the suite cycle, as a rule, has its own logic of dramatic development, highlighting the universal mythological model.

It is necessary to consider the features of the functioning of the mythological code in the stylization suites.

The object of deep and close study is the process of introducing suite features into the sonata-symphony cycle, observed already in the 19th century (Borodin's Second Quartet, Tchaikovsky's Third and Sixth Symphonies) and especially in the 20th century (Taneev's piano quintet, Schnittke's quintet, 11th, 15 quartets, 8th, 13th symphonies of Shostakovich).

The panorama of the historical overview of the suite genre will be enriched by a journey into the world of the Western European suite, a study of various national suites in their historical development. Thus, the French baroque suite rejects a stable sequence of dances. This leaves an imprint on its semantic-dramatic basis, which differs from the German suite and is built according to other principles that require further research.

The study of the suite as a genre form is inexhaustible. This genre is represented by the richest musical material. Turning to the suite gives the composer a sense of freedom, does not constrain any restrictions and rules, provides unique opportunities for self-expression and, as a result, harmonizes the creative person, plunging into the realm of intuition, into the unknown-beautiful world of the subconscious, into the greatest mystery of the soul and spirit.

1. Aranovsky M. Symphonic Searches: Research Essays. JL, 1979.

2. Aranovsky M. The structure of the musical genre and the current situation in music // Musical contemporary / Sat. articles: Issue 6. M., 1987. S.5-44.

3. Asafiev B. Musical form as a process. Book. 1 and 2. L., 1971.

4. Bobrovsky B. Functional foundations of musical form. M., 1976.

5. Bobrovsky B. Cyclic forms. Suite. Sonata cycle // Book about music. M., 1975. S.293-309.

6. Kyuregyan T. Form in the music of the XVII-XX centuries. M., 1998.

7. Livanova T. Western European music of the XVII-XVIII centuries in a number of arts. M., 1977.

8. Mazel L. The structure of musical works. M., 1979.

9. Manukyan I. Suite // Musical Encyclopedia. In 6 volumes: V.5. M., 1981. Stb. 359-363.

10. Yu.Medushevsky V. Intonation form of music. M., 1993.11. Nazaikinsky E. The logic of musical composition. M., 1982.

11. Neklyudov Yu. Suite // Musical Encyclopedic Dictionary. M., 1990. S.529-530.

12. Nosina V. On the composition and content of the French suites by I.S. Bach // Interpretation of keyboard works by J.S. Bach / Sat. tr. GMPI them. Gnesins: Issue. 109. M., 1993. S. 52-72.

13. Pikalova N. Chamber instrumental suite in Russian Soviet music of the 60s-first half of the 80s (theoretical aspects of the genre): Dis. . cand. claim. L., 1989.

14. Popova T. Musical genres and forms. M., 1954.

15. Popova T. About musical genres. M., 1981.

16. Rozhnovsky V. Interaction of the principles of shaping and its role in the genesis of classical forms: Dis. cand. claim. M., 1994.

17. Skrebkov S. Textbook for the analysis of musical works. M., 1958.

18. Skrebkov S. Artistic principles of musical styles. M., 1973.

19. Sokolov O. To the problem of typology of musical genres // Problems of music of the XX century. Gorky, 1977. S. 12-58.

20. Sposobin I. Musical form. M., 1972.

21. Starcheus M. New life of the genre tradition // Musical contemporary / Sat. articles: Issue 6. M., 1987. S.45-68.

22. Kholopova V. Forms of musical works. Tutorial. SPb., 1999.

23. Zuckerman V. Analysis of musical works. variation form. M., 1974.

24. Zukkerman V. Musical genres and foundations of musical forms. M., 1964.

25. Shchelkanovtseva E. Suites for cello solo I.S. Bach. M., 1997.

26. Yavorsky B. Bach suites for clavier. M.-JL, 1947.1.. Studies in the history of the suite

27. Abyzova E. "Pictures at an Exhibition" by Mussorgsky. M., 1987.

28. Alekseev A. History of piano art: Textbook. In 3 parts: Ch.Z. M., 1982.

29. Alekseev A. History of piano art: Textbook. In 3 parts: 4.1 and 2. M., 1988.

30. Baranova T. Dance music of the Renaissance // Music and choreography of modern ballet / Sat. articles: Issue 4. M., 1982. S.8-35.

31. Bobrovsky V. Analysis of the composition of "Pictures at an Exhibition" // V.P. Bobrovsky. Articles. Research. M., 1988. S.120-148.

32. Valkova V. On earth, in heaven and in the underworld. Musical wanderings in "Pictures at an Exhibition" // Academy of Music. 1999. No.2. pp. 138-144.

33. Vasina-Grossman V. Mussorgsky and Hoffman // Artistic processes in Russian culture of the second half of the XIX century. M., 1984. S.37-51.

34. Dolzhansky A. Symphonic music of Tchaikovsky. Selected works. M.-JL, 1965.

35. Druskin M. Clavier music (Spain, England, the Netherlands, France, Italy, Germany of the 16th-18th centuries). L., 1960.

36. Efimenkova B. Preface. P.I. Chaikovsky. Suite from the ballet "The Nutcracker". Score. M., 1960.38.3enkin K. Piano miniature and the ways of musical romanticism. M., 1997.

37. History of Russian music. In 10 volumes: V.7: 70-80s of the XIX century. 4.1. M., 1994.

38. History of Russian music. In 10 volumes: V.10A: The end of the 19th-beginning of the 20th century. M., 1997.

39. History of Russian music. In 10 volumes: V.9: The end of the 19th-beginning of the 20th century. M., 1994.

40. History of Russian music: Textbook. In 3 editions: Issue 1. M., 1999.

41. Kalashnik M. Interpretation of the suite and partita in the creative practice of the XX century: Dis. cand. claim. Kharkov, 1991.

42. Kalinichenko N. Mussorgsky's cycle "Pictures at an Exhibition" and artistic culture XIX century // Interaction of the Arts: Methodology, Theory, Education in the Humanities / Proceedings of the Intern. scientific-practical. conf. Astrakhan, 1997, pp. 163-168.

43. Kandinsky-Rybnikov A. Annotation to the record "Children's Album" P.I. Tchaikovsky performed by M. Pletnev.

44. Kenigsberg A. Annotation to the record. M. Glinka "Farewell to Petersburg". Carl Zarin (tenor), Hermann Braun (piano), vocal ensemble. Conductor Y. Vorontsov.

45. Kurysheva T. Blokovsky cycle of D. Shostakovich // Blok and music / Sat. articles. M.-L., 1972. S.214-228.

46. ​​Livanova T. History of Western European music until 1789. In 2 volumes. M., 1983.

47. Livanova T. Musical dramaturgy of Bach and its historical connections. 4.1: Symphony. M.-L., 1948.

48. Merkulov A. Some features of the composition and interpretation of "Pictures at an Exhibition" by Mussorgsky // Problems of organizing a musical work / Sat. scientific Proceedings of Moscow. state conservatory. M., 1979. S.29-53.

49. Merkulov A. Schumann's Piano Suite Cycles: Issues of Compositional Integrity and Interpretation. M., 1991.

50. Milka A. Some issues of development and shaping in the suites of I.S. Bach for cello solo // Theoretical problems of musical forms and genres / Sat. articles. M., 1971. S. 249-291.

51. Petrash A. The evolution of the genres of the solo bow sonata and suite until the middle of the 18th century: Diss. claim. L., 1975.

52. Petrova (Masliy) S. Mythological code as one of the methods of musicological analysis on the example of clavier suites by I.S. Bach // Musical construction and meaning / Sat. Proceedings of the RAM them. Gnesins: Issue. 151. M., 1999. P. 99-106.

53. Polyakova L. "The Seasons" P.I. Tchaikovsky. Explanation. M.-L., 1951.

54. Polyakova L. “Pictures at an Exhibition” by Mussorgsky. Explanation. M.-L., 1951.

55. Polyakova L. “Kursk Songs” by G. Sviridov. M., 1970.

56. Polyakova L. Vocal cycles by G. Sviridov. M., 1971.

57. Polyakova L. D. Shostakovich's vocal cycle "From Jewish Folk Poetry". Explanation. M., 1957.

58. Popova T. Symphonic suite // Popova T. Symphonic music. M., 1963. S.39-41.63. Popova T. Suite. M., 1963.

59. Pylaeva L. Harpsichord and chamber-ensemble works of F. Couperin as the embodiment of suite thinking: Dis. cand. claim. M., 1986.

60. Rabei V. Sonatas and Partitas by I.S. Bach for violin solo. M., 1970.

61. Rozanova Y. History of Russian music. T.2, book Z. Second half of the 19th century. P.I. Tchaikovsky: Textbook. M., 1986.

62. Rosenshield K. History of foreign music. Until the middle of the 18th century: Issue L.M., 1978.

63. Ruchyevskaya E., Kuzmina N. The poem "Departed Rus'" in the context of Sviridov's author's style // Musical world of Georgy Sviridov / Sat. articles. M., 1990. S.92-123.

64. Sokolov O. Morphological system of music and its artistic genres. N. Novgorod, 1994.

65. Sokurova O., Belonenko A. “Consonant and harmonious choirs” (Reflections on the “Pushkin wreath” by Georgy Sviridov) // Musical world of Georgy Sviridov / Sat. articles. M., 1990. S.56-77.

66. Solovtsov A. Symphonic works of Rimsky-Korsakov. M., 1960.

67. Tynyanova E. "Songs and Dances of Death" by Mussorgsky // Russian Romance. Experience of intonation analysis / Sat. articles. M.-L., 1930. S. 118-146.

68. Khokhlov Yu. Tchaikovsky's orchestral suites. M., 1961.

69. Yudina M. Mussorgsky Modest Petrovich. “Pictures at an Exhibition” // M.V. Yudin. Articles, memoirs, materials. M., 1978. S.290-299.

70. Yampolsky I. Sonatas and partitas for solo violin I.S. Bach. M., 1963.

71. I. Researches on mythology, ritual

72. Baiburin A. Ritual in traditional culture. Structural and semantic analysis of East Slavic rites. SPb., 1993.

73. Vartanova E. Mythopoetic aspects of S.V. Rachmaninov // S.V. Rakhmaninov. To the 120th anniversary of his birth (1873-1993) / Scientific works of Mosk. state conservatory. M., 1995. S.42-53.

74. Gabay Yu. Romantic myth about the artist and the problems of the psychology of musical romanticism // Problems of musical romanticism / Sat. Proceedings of LGITM them. Cherkasov. L., 1987. S.5-30.

75. Gerver L. Music and musical mythology in the work of Russian poets (the first decade of the XX century): Dis. doc. claim. M., 1998.

76. Gulyga A. Myth and modernity // Foreign literature. 1984. No. 2. S. 167-174.81. Evzlin M. Cosmogony and ritual. M., 1993.

77. Kedrov K. Poetic space. M., 1989.

78. Krasnova O. On the correlation of the categories of mythopoetic and musical // Music and myth / Sat. Proceedings of the GMPI them. Gnesins: Issue. 118. M., 1992. S.22-39.

79. Levi-Strauss K. Structural Anthropology. M., 1985.

80. Losev A. Dialectics of myth // Myth. Number. Essence. M., 1994. S.5-216.

81. Lotman Y. The origin of the plot in typological coverage // Lotman Y. Selected articles. In 3 volumes: V.1. Tallinn, 1992. S.224-242.

82. Lotman Y. The phenomenon of culture // Lotman Y. Selected articles. In 3 volumes: V.1. Tallinn, 1992. S.34-45.

83. Lotman Yu., Uspensky B. Myth is the name of culture // Lotman Yu. Selected articles. In 3 volumes: V.1. Tallinn, 1992. S.58-75.

84. Meletinsky E. Poetics of myth. M., 1976.

85. Pashina O. Calendar-song cycle among the Eastern Slavs. M., 1998.

86. Propp V. Russian agricultural holidays: Experience of historical and ethnographic research. L., 1963.

87. Putilov B. Motive as a plot-forming element // Typological research on folklore. M., 1975. S. 141-155.

88. Florensky P. At the watersheds of thought: V.2. M., 1990.

89. Schelling F. Philosophy of Art. M., 1966.

90. Schlegel F. Conversation about poetry // Aesthetics. Philosophy. Criticism. In 2 volumes: V.1. M., 1983. S.365-417.

91. Jung K. Archetype and symbol. M., 1991.1 .. Studies in philosophy, literary criticism, cultural studies, psychoanalysis and general issues of musicology

92. Akopyan L. Analysis of the deep structure of the musical text. M., 1995.

93. Aranovsky M. Musical text. Structure and properties. M., 1998.

94. Barsova I. The specificity of the language of music in creating an artistic picture of the world // Artistic creativity. Issues of complex study. M., 1986. S.99-116.

95. Bakhtin M. The novel of education and its significance in the history of realism // Bakhtin M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. M., 1979. S.180-236.

96. Bakhtin M. Forms of time and chronotope in the novel. Essays on historical poetics // Bakhtin M. Literary-critical articles. M., 1986. S. 121290.

97. Berdyaev N. Origins and meaning of Russian communism. M., 1990.

98. Berdyaev N. Self-knowledge. M., 1991.

99. Valkova V. Musical thematic Thinking - Culture. Monograph. N. Novgorod, 1992.

100. Gasparov B. Structural method in musicology // Soviet music. 1972. No.2. S.42-51.

101. Gachev G. National images of the world. Cosmo Psycho - Logos. M., 1995.

102. Gachev G. Content art forms. Epos. Lyrics. Theater. M., 1968.

103. Kirnarskaya D. Musical perception: Monograph. M., 1997.

104. Klyuchnikov S. The sacred science of numbers. M., 1996.

105. Likhachev D. Notes on Russian. M., 1981.

106. Lobanova M. Western European musical baroque: problems of aesthetics and poetics. M., 1994.

107. Lobanova M. Musical style and genre: history and modernity. M., 1990.

108. Lotman Yu. Analysis poetic text. The structure of the verse. L., 1972.

109. Lotman Yu. Conversations about Russian culture. Life and traditions of the Russian nobility (XVIII-early XIX century). SPb., 1997.

110. Lotman Yu. Two “Autumns” // Yu.M. Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow semiotic school. M., 1994. S.394-406.

111. Lotman Y. Dolls in the system of culture // Lotman Y. Selected articles. In 3 volumes: V.1. Tallinn, 1992, pp. 377-380.

112. Lotman Yu. Lectures on structural poetics // Yu.M. Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow Semiotic School. M., 1994. S.11-263.

113. Lotman Yu. Articles on the typology of culture: Issue 2. Tartu, 1973.

114. Lotman Yu. Structure artistic text. M., 1970.

115. Pushkin A.S. Blizzard // A.S. Pushkin. Collected works. In 8 volumes: V.7. M., 1970. S.92-105.

116. Pyatkin S. The symbolism of the "blizzard" in the work of A.S. Pushkin in the 30s // Boldinsky Readings. N. Novgorod, 1995. S. 120-129.

117. Sokolsky M. With the smoke of fires // Soviet music. 1969. No. 9. S.58-66. No. 10. P.71-79.

118. Starcheus M. Psychology and mythology of artistic creativity // Processes of musical creativity. Sat. Proceedings No. 140 RAM them. Gnesins: Issue 2. M., 1997. S.5-20.

119. Tresidder D. Dictionary of symbols. M., 1999.

120. Trubetskoy E. Three essays on the Russian icon. Novosibirsk, 1991.

121. Fortunatov N. Pushkin and Tchaikovsky (on the epigraph to the play "January. By the Fireside" from Tchaikovsky's "The Seasons" // Boldin Readings / A.S. Pushkin Museum-Reserve. Nizhny Novgorod, 1995. P. 144-156 .

122. Huizinga J. Autumn of the Middle Ages: Research. M., 1988.

123. Kholopova V. Music as a form of art. 4.2. The content of the musical work. M., 1991.

124. Shklovsky V. Bowstring // Selected. In 2 volumes: V.2. M., 1983. S.4-306.

125. Spengler O. Decline of Europe. Essays on the morphology of world history. 1. Gestalt and reality. M., 1993.

126. V. Research on related musicological issues

127. Alekseev A. Russian piano music (late 19th - early 20th century). M., 1969.

128. Alekseev A. Soviet piano music (1917-1945). M., 1974.

129. Aranovsky M. Musical "dystopias" by Shostakovich // Russian music and the XX century. M., 1997. S.213-249.

130. Aranovsky M. Symphony and time // Russian music and the XX century. M., 1997. S.303-370.

131. Arkadiev M. Sviridov's lyrical universe // Russian music and the XX century. M., 1997. S.251-264.

132. Asafiev B. About symphonic and chamber music. L., 1981.

133. Asafiev B. Russian music of the 19th and early 20th centuries. L., 1968.

134. Asafiev B. French music and its modern representatives // Foreign music of the XX century / Materials and documents. M., 1975. S.112-126.

135. Asmus V. On the work of Mussorgsky // Path: International Philosophical Journal. 1995. No.7. pp.249-260.

136. Belonenko A. The beginning of the path (to the history of the Sviridov style) // Musical world of Georgy Sviridov / Sat. articles. M., 1990. S.146-164.

137. Bobrovsky V. On the musical thinking of Shostakovich. Three fragments // Dedicated to Shostakovich. Sat. articles for the 90th anniversary of the composer (1906-1996). M., 1997.S.39-61.

138. Bobrovsky V. Implementation of the Passacaglia Genre in Shostakovich's Sonata-Symphonic Cycles // V.P. Bobrovsky. Articles. Research. M., 1988. S.234-255.

139. Bryantseva V. On the implementation of waltz in the work of P.I. Tchaikovsky and S.V. Rachmaninov // S.V. Rakhmaninov. To the 120th anniversary of his birth (18731993) / Scientific works of Mosk. state conservatory. M., 1995. S. 120-128.

140. Vasina-Grossman V. Masters of the Soviet romance. M., 1968.

141. Vasina-Grossman V. Music and poetic word. In 3 parts: 4.2. Intonation. Ch.Z. Composition. M., 1978.

142. Vasina-Grossman V. On the poetry of Blok, Yesenin and Mayakovsky in Soviet music // Poetry and music / Sat. articles and research. M., 1973. S.97-136.

143. Vasina-Grossman V. Romantic song of the 19th century. M., 1966.

144. Vasina-Grossman V. Russian classical romance of the 19th century. M., 1956.

145. Veselov V. Star romance // Musical world of George Sviridov / Sat. articles. M., 1990. S. 19-32.

146. Gakkel L. Piano music of the XX century: Essays. M.-L., 1976.

147. Golovinsky G. Way to the XX century. Mussorgsky // Russian music and the XX century. M., 1997. S.59-90.

148. Golovinsky G. Schumann and Russian composers of the 19th century // Russian-German musical connections. M., 1996. S.52-85.

149. Golovinsky G. Mussorgsky and Tchaikovsky. comparative experience. M., 2001.

150. Gulyanitskaya N. Introduction to modern harmony. M., 1984.

151. Delson V. D.D. Shostakovich. M., 1971.

152. Dolinskaya E. Late period works of Shostakovich // Dedicated to Shostakovich. Sat. articles for the 90th anniversary of the composer (1906-1996). M., 1997. S.27-38.

153. Durandina E. Mussorgsky's vocal work. M., 1985.

154. Druzhinin S. The system of means of musical rhetoric in the orchestral suites of I.S. Bach, G.F. Handel, G.F. Telemann: Dis. .cand. claim. M., 2002.

155. Izmailova L. Sviridov's instrumental music (on the issue of intrastyle contacts) // Georgy Sviridov / Sat. articles and research. M., 1979. S.397-427.

156. Kandinsky A. Symphonic Tales Rimsky-Korsakov in the 60s (Russian musical fairy tale between "Ruslan" and "Snegurochka") // From Lully to the present day / Sat. articles. M., 1967. S.105-144.

157. Kirakosova M. Chamber vocal cycle in the work of M.P. Mussorgsky and his traditions: Dis.cand. claim. Tbilisi, 1978.

158. Kirakosova M. Mussorgsky and Dostoevsky // Academy of Music. 1999. No.2. pp.132-138.

159. Konen V. Essays on the history of foreign music. M., 1997.

160. Krylova A. Soviet chamber vocal cycle of the 70s and early 80s (on the problem of the evolution of the genre): Dis. claim. M., 1983.

161. Kurysheva T. Chamber vocal cycle in modern Soviet music: Issues of genre, principles of dramaturgy and composition (based on the works of D. Shostakovich, G. Sviridov, Yu. Shaporin, M. Zarin): Dis.cand. claim. Moscow-Riga, 1968.

162. Lazareva N. Artist and time. Issues of semantics in the musical poetics of D. Shostakovich: Dis. claim. Magnitogorsk, 1999.

163. Left T. Space Scriabin // Russian music and the XX century. M., 1997. S. 123150.

164. Leie T. On the implementation of the nocturne genre in the works of D. Shostakovich // Problems of the musical genre / Sat. Proceedings: Issue 54. M., 1981. S.122-133.

165. Masliy S. Suite in Russian music of the 19th century. Lecture on the course "History of Russian Music". M., 2003.

166. Music and myth: Collection of works / GMI them. Gnesins: Issue. 118. M., 1992.

167. Musical encyclopedic dictionary. M., 1990.

168. Nazaikinsky E. The principle of one-time contrast / / Russian book about Bach. M., 1985. S.265-294.

169. Nikolaev A. On the musical embodiment of Pushkin's images // Academy of Music. 1999. No.2. pp.31-41.

170. Oganova T. English virginal music: problems of the formation of instrumental thinking: Dis. claim. M., 1998.

171. Sviridov G. From different records // Academy of Music. 2000. No. 4. S. 20-30.

172. Skvortsova I. Musical poetics of ballet P.I. Tchaikovsky "The Nutcracker": Cand. claim. M., 1992.

173. Skrynnikova O. Slavic cosmos in the operas of Rimsky-Korsakov: Dis.cand. claim. M., 2000.

174. Sporykhina O. Intext as a component of P.I. Tchaikovsky: Dis. Cand. claim. M., 2000.

175. Stepanova I. Philosophical and aesthetic premises of Mussorgsky's musical thinking // Problems of stylistic renewal in Russian classical and Soviet music / Sat. scientific Proceedings of Moscow. state conservatory. M., 1983. S.3-19.

176. Tamoshinskaya T. Rachmaninov's vocal music in the context of the era: Dis.cand. claim. M., 1996.

177. Frolova M. Tchaikovsky and Schumann // Tchaikovsky. Questions of history and theory. Second Sat. articles / Moscow. state conservatory. P.I. Tchaikovsky. M., 1991. S.54-64.

178. Cherevan S. "The Legend of the Invisible City of Kitezh and the Maiden Fevronia" N.A. Rimsky-Korsakov in the Philosophical and Artistic Context of the Epoch: Abstract of Cand. claim. Novosibirsk, 1998.

179. Shulga E. Interpretation of night motifs in European music and related arts of the 19th-first half of the 20th century: Cand. claim. Novosibirsk, 2002.

180. Yareshko M. Problems of Interpretation of D.D. Shostakovich: Dis. Cand. claim. M., 2000.

181. VI. Monographic, epistolary editions

182. Abert G. V.A. Mozart. Part 1, book 1 / Per. K. Sakva. M., 1998.

183. Alshwang A. P. I. Chaikovsky. M., 1970.

184. Asafiev B. Grig. JI., 1986.

185. Bryantseva V. S. V. Rakhmaninov. M., 1976.

186. Golovinsky G., Sabinina M. Modest Petrovich Mussorgsky. M., 1998.

187. Grieg E. Selected articles and letters. M., 1966.

188. Danilevich L. Dmitry Shostakovich: Life and work. M., 1980.

189. Dmitri Shostakovich in letters and documents. M., 2000.

190. Druskin M. Johann Sebastian Bach. M., 1982.

191. Zhitomirsky D. Robert Schumann. M., 1964.

192. Keldysh Yu. Rakhmaninov and his time. M., 1973.

193. Levasheva O. Mikhail Ivanovich Glinka: Monograph. In 2 books: Book 2. M., 1988.

194. Levasheva O. Edvard Grieg: Essay on life and creativity. M., 1975.

195. Meyer K. Dmitry Shostakovich: Life, creativity, time / Per. E. Gulyaeva. SPb., 1998.

196. Mikheeva L. Life of Dmitry Shostakovich. M., 1997.

197. Rachmaninov S. Memories recorded by Oscar von Rizemann. M., 1992.

198. Rakhmanova M. Nikolai Andreevich Rimsky-Korsakov. M., 1995.

199. Rimsky-Korsakov N. Chronicle of my musical life. M., 1980.

200. Sohor A. A. P. Borodin. Life, activity, musical creativity. M.-L., 1965.

201. Tumanina N. Great master. 1878-1893. M., 1968.

202. Tumanina N. The path to mastery 1840-1877. M., 1962.

203. Finn Benestad Dag Schelderup-Ebbe. E. Grieg. Man and artist. M., 1986.

204. Khentova S. Shostakovich: Life and work. In 2 volumes. M., 1996.

205. Tchaikovsky M. Life of Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky: (According to documents stored in the archive in Klin). In 3 volumes. M., 1997.

206. Tchaikovsky P. Complete Works. literary works and correspondence. T.4. M., 1961.

207. Tchaikovsky P. Complete Works. Literary works and correspondence. T.6. M., 1961.

208. Tchaikovsky P. Complete Works. Literary works and correspondence. T. 12. M., 1970.

209. Schweitzer A. Johann Sebastian Bach. M., 1965.

210. Altman G. Tanzformen und Suite // Altman G. Musikalische Formenlehre: Mit Beispielen und Analysen. Berlin, 1968. S.103-130.

211. Beck H. Die Suite. Koln, 1964.

212. Blume F. Studien zur Vorgeschichte der Orchestersuite im XV und XVI Jahrhundert. Leipzig, 1925.

213. Fuller D. Suite // The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians: Vol. 18. London, 1980. P.333-350.

214. McKee E/ Influences of the early eighteenth century social minuet on the minuet from I.S. Bach suites // Music Analysis: Vol.18. 1999. No. 12. P.235-260.

215. Mellers W. Chopin, Schumann and Mendelssohn // Man and his music. The story of musical experience in the west. Part II. London, 1962. P.805-834.

216. Mellers W. The Russian nationalist // Man and his music. The story of musical experience in the west. Part II. London, 1962. P.851-875.

217. Milner A. The baroque: instrumental music // Man and his music. The story of musical experience in the west. Part II. London, 1962. P.531-569.

218. Nef K. Geschichte der Sinfonie und Suite. Leipzig, 1921.

219. Norlind T. Zur Geschichte der Suite // Samm. d. J.M.G.: Bd.7, Heft 2. Leipzig, 1905-1906. S. 172-204.

220. Riemann H. Zur Geschichte der deutschen Suite // Sammelbande der Internationalen Musikgesellschaft: Bd.6., Heft 7. Leipzig, 1904-1905. S.501-514.

221. Wilson E. Shostakovich: A life Remembered. London; Boston, 1994.