The structure of values ​​in modern Russian society. Social values ​​in modern Russia

The transformation of Russian society could not but affect the system of values ​​and values ​​of Russians. Today much is said and written about the destruction of the system of values ​​traditional for Russian culture, the Westernization of public consciousness.

It is the values ​​that ensure the integration of society, helping individuals to make a socially approved choice of their behavior in vital situations.

Today's youth aged 15 to 17 are children born during a period of radical socio-political and economic change ("children of change"). The period of their upbringing in the life of their parents coincided with the requirements strictly dictated by reality to develop new life strategies for adapting, and sometimes even surviving, in a dynamically changing life reality. Basic values ​​are considered to be those that form the basis of a person's value consciousness and implicitly influence his actions in various areas of life. They are formed during the period of the so-called primary socialization of the individual by the age of 18-20, and then remain quite stable, undergoing changes only during the crisis periods of a person’s life and his social environment.

What characterizes the value consciousness of today's "children of change"? It was proposed to name the five most significant life values ​​for them. The group of preferred values ​​included the following criteria: health (87.3%), family (69.7%), communication with friends (65.8%), money, material goods (64.9%) and love (42.4%). ). The level below the average (shared by 20 to 40% of respondents) formed such values ​​as independence, freedom, work to their liking, self-realization. The lowest status (less than 20%) was given to such values ​​as personal security, prestige, fame, creativity, communication with nature.

At the same time, young people understand that in modern conditions a person's position in society is determined precisely by a person's personal achievements in education, professional activity (38.1% of respondents), as well as his personal qualities - intelligence, strength, attractiveness, etc. (29% of respondents). And such qualities as the social status of the family, possession of material resources are not of great importance.

The structure of the basic values ​​of our respondents is quite consistent with their ideas about the main criteria for success in life. So, among the three most significant criteria, there are: the presence of a family, children (71.5%), reliable friends (78.7%), interesting work (53.7%), such indicators as the presence of prestigious property, wealth, a high position important to today's youth. And unfortunately, we have to state a reduction in the importance in the eyes of young people of such a socially oriented goal as "an honestly lived life."

First of all, under the influence of the media, according to young people, there is a formation of such qualities as a citizen and a patriot (22.3%), propaganda of money (31.7%), violence (15.5%), justice (16.9%) , faith in God (8.3%), family values ​​(9.7%).

The answer of young respondents to the question of what they consider the main thing in the upbringing of adolescents in modern conditions seems to be very important. As can be seen from the survey, today's youth demonstrate a fairly wide range of educational orientations, among which is the need to give children a good education, to instill organization, self-discipline and hard work, to cultivate honesty and kindness, as well as stamina and mental abilities.

Thus, in the educational orientations of modern young people, there is a combination of the so-called “bread” moments (education, training in a profession that “feeds”) and the need for moral improvement and upbringing of children (development of honesty, kindness, diligence, self-discipline).

It is noteworthy that the personal qualities associated with the attitude towards other people also have a focus on traditional moral orientations among young people. Of interest in this regard is the answer about the most important human qualities that are most valued in people. Thus, such qualities as responsiveness (82.4%), reliability (92.8%), honesty (74.9%), hospitality (58.2%), modesty (25.6%) received the highest rating. entrepreneurial spirit (57.8%).

One of the traditional basic values ​​of Russian society is love for one's Motherland.

Family values ​​are paramount at all times. Recently, about a hundred different marriages have been distinguished in the west. 61.9% of respondents consider this to be normal. But when answering the question: “How do you feel about the birth of children out of wedlock?”, We revealed the exact opposite of the previous answer. Thus, 56.5% believe that this is simply unacceptable in their lives.

In the structure of young people's value orientations, there is an unstable balance between traditional values ​​and the new pragmatic "morality of success", the desire to combine values ​​that ensure the success of activities, and the preservation of traditionally valuable relationships to a person, family, team. It is possible that in the future this will be expressed in the formation of a new moral system.

Such inalienable values ​​for a democratic society as freedom and property have not yet become sufficiently actualized in the minds of Russians. Accordingly, the ideas of freedom and political democracy are not very popular. Indeed, the old ideas and values ​​have undergone changes and have lost their former existential meaning. But the value system inherent in modern societies has not yet been formed. This is the value conflict. This is partly due to the inconsistent activities of the authorities. The difficult psycho-emotional state of the Russians is superimposed on their conviction that the authorities themselves do not comply with any laws, and it is precisely due to this that lawlessness reigns in Russia. This situation leads, on the one hand, to the spread of legal nihilism and a sense of permissiveness, and on the other hand, provokes a high demand for legality as the simplest need.

  • Specialty HAC RF09.00.11
  • Number of pages 150

Chapter 1. The role of values ​​in the life of society.

1.1. Society values ​​as a system.

1.2. The system of values ​​is the basis for the existence of civilization.

Chapter 2. The originality of the value system of Russian society.

2.1. The Problem of Identity Russian civilization.

2.2. The evolution of values ​​in Russian society. History and current state.

Chapter 3 new system values ​​in modern northern society.^

3.1. Northern society as a regional subcivilization.^

3.2. Prospects for the formation of a new value system in the northern society.1 u"

Introduction to the thesis (part of the abstract) on the topic "Formation of the value system in modern Russian society"

The change of millennia is a rare event in the life of mankind, all the more rare, given that there were changes in the reckoning, which, as it were, threw history back, starting the countdown from scratch. According to the ancient Russian chronology, which existed before the Petrine reforms, it is now the year 75081 from the creation of the world, although it is not entirely clear who the summers were considered to be, since the history of the Russian state has about a thousand years, and Russian civilization - several centuries. From this correlation of dates, we can conclude that Russia, in any case, its certain cultural layer, has very ancient roots, on the other hand, Russia is a young civilization, especially in comparison with ancient.

The country enters the change of millenniums from the Nativity of Christ renewed, public moods are dominated by the desire to continue the initiated economic and social reforms, despite the fact that each social stratum understands their goals and sees their methods in their own way. The failures of the reforms are connected precisely with these disagreements, with the lack of coordination of social programs and reforms with the interests of various strata and regions of society.

The relevance of the research topic is due to the fact that a serious study of the whole complex of reasons for the failures that befell the reformers of Russian society in the 90s has not yet been launched. the outgoing century. One of the reasons is the lack of clear ideas about the specifics of the regions that make up Russian society.

1 Compare: Soloviev S.M. Works. In 18 books. Book. VII. T. 13-14. History of Russia since ancient times - M.: Thought, 1991; pp. 252, 320,582.

In the views of the reformers of the early 90s. there was no understanding of the socio-cultural identity of Russia in general and the regions in particular. They proclaimed their goal to return the country to world civilization, meaning the creation of an economic and political system on the Western model. The transformation of social relations in this direction ran into the deaf and silent resistance of Russian society, huge in its spatial dimensions and diverse in its ethnic composition.

Today, Russian society needs an objective, as far as possible, and non-ideological socio-philosophical analysis. Only after carrying out such work is it possible to further intensify such a reform process that can bring positive results. Otherwise, the new wave of reforms will once again be painful and, to a certain extent, meaningless.

The degree of theoretical development of the problem. The problem of the influence of natural conditions on the course of Russian history was given much attention in the works of pre-revolutionary historians of the 19th - early 20th centuries S.M. Solovieva, V.O. Klyuchevsky, N.I. Kostomarov. In their works, the history of the people of Russia was considered mainly as a derivative of the warehouse of its character, special, according to the apt expression of V.G. Belinsky, "the manner of understanding things"1, and this manner was an imprint of the surrounding landscape.2

1 Belinsky V.G. Cit. according to ed. : Reflections on Russia and Russians. Strokes to the portrait of the Russian national character. - M.: Pravda International, 1996, p.Z.

2 Klyuchevsky V.O. Works. In 9 volumes - M .: Thought, 1987-1988; Kostomarov N.I. Home life and customs of the Great Russian people. - M.: Economics, 1993; Soloviev S.M. Works. In 18 books. History of Russia since ancient times. - M.: Thought, 1989-1992.

The founder of the cultural-historical approach was N.Ya. Danilevsky, however, this approach has already received a thorough development directly as a civilizational one in Western social thought, primarily in the works of O. Spengler, P. Sorokin, A. Toynbee.1

The civilizational approach to the analysis of the historical path of Russia began to be vigorously developed in Russian thought only in the second half of the 1980s. twentieth century. As the reforms slowed down, the problem of the civilizational specifics of Russian society came to the center of attention of domestic social science. The discussion of the issues of the conditionality of the content of the reforms of society by its civilizational characteristics, the system of values ​​inherent in it as the core of culture, and the determination by them of the processes of social life was devoted in the 90s. a significant amount of literature2 Large

1 Danilevsky N.Ya. Russia and Europe - M.: Book, 1991; Spengler O. Decline of Europe: Essays on the morphology of world history - M .: Thought, 1993; Sorokin P. A. About the Russian nation. Russia and America. -M. 1992; Sorokin P. A. Public textbook of sociology. Articles of different years. - M.: Nauka, 1994; Sorokin P.A. Human. Civilization. Society. -M.: Politizdat, 1992; Toynbee A. J. Comprehension of history: - M .: Progress, 1991.

2 See: Vasilenko I.A. Dialogue of Civilizations: Sociocultural Problems of Political Partnership. -M.: Editorial URSS, 1999; Gachev G.D. National images of the world. America in comparison with Russia and the Slavs. - M.: Raritet, 1997; Glushenkova E. Global crisis of civilization, sustainable development and political future of Russia http://www.ccsis.msk.ru/Russia/4/Glob33.htm; Golts G.A. Culture and Economics: Search for Relationships // Social Sciences and Modernity, 2000. No. 1; Spiritual arrangement of Russia. Collection. - Kursk: GUIPP "Kursk", 1996; Erasov B. S. Spiritual foundations and dynamics of Russian civilization, http://scd.plus.centro.ni/7.htm; Erasov B.S. On the geopolitical and civilizational structure of Eurasia // Civilizations and Cultures. Scientific almanac. Issue. 3. Russia and the East: geopolitics and civilizational relations. M.: Publishing House of the Institute of Oriental Studies, 1996; Erasov B.S. Civilization theory and Eurasian studies // Civilizations and cultures. Scientific almanac. Issue. 3. Russia and the East: geopolitics and civilizational relations. - M.: Publishing House of the Institute of Oriental Studies, 1996; Ilyin V.V., Akhiezer A.S. Russian statehood: origins, traditions, prospects. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1997; Lurie C.B. Perception by the people of the developed territory // Social sciences and modernity, 1998. No. 5; Ionov I.N. Paradoxes of Russian civilization (in the wake of one scientific discussion) / / Social sciences and modernity 1999 No. 5; Lurie C.B. Nationalism, ethnicity, culture. Categories of Science and Historical Practice // Social Sciences and Modernity 1999 No. 4; Mamut L.S. The Image of the State as an Algorithm of Political Behavior // Social Sciences and Modernity, 1998. No. 6; Martynov A.S., Vinogradov V.G. Dominant types of nature management cultures and relationships with nature. http://www.sci.aha.ru/ATL/ra22a.htm; Makhnach V. Other. Anthology of the new Russian self-consciousness. Russia in the XX century (Diagnosis of a cultural historian). http://vvww.russ.ru/ antolog/inoe/mahnach.htm/mahnach.htm; Mezhuev V.M. Russian path of civilizational development "Power" 1996 No. 11; Mitrokhin S.S. State policy and society's values ​​// Political studies 1997. No. 1; Nazaretyan A.P. “Aggression, morality and crises contributed to the development of the problems of Russia as a state and Russian civilization by the works of A.S. Akhiezer, B.S. Erasova, V.M. Mezhueva.1 The huge heritage of the outstanding philosophers of the Russian diaspora H.A. was returned from oblivion. Berdyaeva, G.P. Fedotova, P.A. Sorokin, ideologists of Eurasianism. 2

current state spiritual processes in Russia and the causes of their crisis situation was devoted to a number of independent theoretical seminars on the socio-cultural methodology of the analysis of Russian society. The materials of these seminars were published on the Internet. Among them are the works of A.C. Akhiezer, I.Gr. development of world culture. (Synergetics of the social process). - M .: Association "Knizhnik", 1995; Naishul V.A. On the norms of modern Russian statehood. http://www.inme.ru./norms.htm; Nalimov V.V. In search of other meanings. - M.: Progress Publishing Group, 1993; Panarin A.S. Global political forecasting in conditions of political instability. - M.: Editorial URSS, 1999; Polyakov L.V. Methodology for the study of Russian modernization / / Political studies 1997 No. 3; Shapovalov V.F. Perception of Russia in the West: Myths and Reality // Social Sciences and Modernity, 2000. No. 1; Yakovenko I. Gr. Power in Russian traditional culture: the experience of cultural analysis http://scd.plus.centro.ni/3.htm; Yakovenko I.G. Confrontation as a Form of Dialogue (A Dynamic Aspect of Western Perception). // Frontiers 1995 No. 6; pp. 106-123; Yakovenko I.G. Russia's Past and Present: Imperial Ideal and National Interest// Political Studies 1997, No. 4, P. 88-96; Yanov A.L. Methodology for the study of political tradition in Russia, http://scd.plus.centro.ru/22.htm

1 See: Akhiezer A.C. Russia: criticism of historical experience. - M.: Publishing House of the Philosophical Society of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1991; Akhiezer A.S. The specifics of the historical path of Russia. http://www.libertarium.ru/libertarium/llibahies3; Erasov B.S. Spiritual Foundations and Dynamics of Russian Civilization, http://scd.plus.centro.ni/7.htm; Erasov B.S., Avanesova G.A. Problems of analysis of the dyad center - periphery of civilizations // Comparative study of civilizations. - M.: Aspect Press, 1999; Mezhuev V.M. Russian path of civilizational development // "Power" 1996. No. 11.

2 Berdyaev H.A. The sin of war. - M.: Culture, 1993; Berdyaev H.A. About the appointment of a person. - M.: Respublika, 1993; Berdyaev H.A. The fate of Russia. - M.: Soviet writer, 1990; Berdyaev H.A. Philosophy of freedom. The origins and meaning of Russian communism. - M .: CJSC "Svarog and 1C", - 1997; Vernadsky G.V. Ancient Rus': Per. from English. - Tver: LEAN; M.: AGRAF, 1996; Vernadsky G.V. Russian historiography. - M.: AGRAF, 1998; Gumilyov L.N. From Rus' to Russia: essays on ethnic history. - M.: Ekopros, 1992; Gumilyov L.N. Rhythms of Eurasia: Epochs and Civilizations. - M.: Ecopros, 1993; Fedotov G.P. On Holiness, Intelligentsia and Bolshevism: Selected Articles. - St. Petersburg: Publishing house S.-Petersburg. University, 1994; Fedotov G.P. The fate and sins of Russia / selected articles on the philosophy of Russian history and culture: In 2 volumes - St. Petersburg: Sofia, 1991; Sorokin P.A. About the Russian nation. Russia and America. -M. 1992; Sorokin P. A. Public textbook of sociology. Articles of different years. - M.: Nauka, 1994; Sorokin P.A. Human. Civilization. Society-M.: Politizdat, 1992. Gumilyov L.N. From Rus' to Russia: essays on ethnic history. - M.: Ekopros, 1992; Russia between Europe and Asia: Eurasian temptation: An anthology. - M.: Nauka, 1993; Savitsky P.N. Eurasianism as a historical design // Social theory and modernity. Issue. 18. Eurasian project of modernization of Russia: "for" and "against". - M.: Publishing house of the RAGS, 1995.

Yakovenko, G.A. Goltz, I.N. Ionova, A.L. Troshina, A.L. Yanova, A. Shemyakina.1

An interesting idea was put forward to create a complex scientific discipline - Russian studies.2

At the same time, it should be noted that the theoretical positions of modern authors are very original, which makes it difficult and, moreover, makes it almost impossible to theoretically develop optimal means of leading the country out of the crisis onto the path of dynamic development. As an ideological basis for the unification of Russian society, four main socio-political positions are proposed, with conditional simplification, namely, state-centralization, liberal-democratic, Orthodox-autocratic and socialist.

The existence of an integral position that could unite all the above, taking from them practically useful, is hardly visible today. Undoubtedly, a civilizational approach can provide help here. One can point to a number of works deserving close attention.3

Despite the active discussion of the features of Russian civilization, it is still very little studied from the point of view of the nature of the relationship between the center and the regions. In the 90s, a new science arose and formed - regional studies, which considers the country

1 Sociocultural methodology for the analysis of Russian society. Independent theoretical seminar. http://scd.plus.centro.ru

2 Shapovalov V.F. Russian Studies as a Complex Scientific Discipline // Social Sciences and Modernity, 1994. No. 2.

3 Alekseeva T., Gorodetsky A. et al. A centrist project for Russia // Svobodnaya mysl' 1994. No. 4; Alekseeva T., Kapustin B., Pantin I. Integrative ideology: An invitation to reflection // Power 1996. No. 11; Political Centrism in Russia - M.: Fund for the Development of Political Centrism, 1999. from the point of view of the "population-economy-nature" system,1 however, the regions of Russia are practically not considered in it as sub-civilizations of the Russian civilization, which have their own characteristics, due to the history of their formation and development. The theoretical comprehension of this aspect of regional problems still awaits serious study.

As for the system of values ​​as the basis for the existence of civilizational formations, so far not enough attention has been paid to the mechanism of changing these systems, to an analysis of the conditions under which the successful formation and emergence of a new system becomes possible. The existence of the state, its well-being are connected with the presence in society of such a system of values, the main, basic values ​​of which are able to give an answer adequate to the challenge of the environment. This, of course, means not only and so much the natural environment, but external world, militarily and economically strong states surrounding Russia, which may pose a threat to the country's national security.2

In the domestic philosophical thought, despite the difficult ideological conditions, in the 60s - 70s of the XX century, a new philosophical direction was actually created - axiology. The concept of value, the systemic nature of society's values, ways of forming values ​​and value attitudes were defined, the principles of the influence of value hierarchies on social processes were discussed,3

1 See: Matrusov N.D. Regional forecasting and regional development Russia. - M: Nauka, 1995; Ignatov V.G., Butov V.I. Regional studies (methodology, politics, economics, law). - Rostov n / a: publishing center "Mart", 1998; Regional studies: Textbook for universities / T.G. Morozova, M.P. Won, S.S. Shgapov, P.A. Islyaev - M.: Banks and exchanges, UNITI, 1999; Titkov A.S. Images of regions in the Russian mass consciousness // Political research 1999. No. 3; Tsyurupa A.I. Alaska, Kamchatka and Siberia in the geopolitical area // Political research 1998. No. 2.

2 See: Crisis society. Our society in three dimensions. - M.: IFRAN, 1994.

3 See: V. P. Tugarinov, Selected Philosophical Works. - L .: Leningrad University Publishing House, 1988; Shishkin A.F., Shvartsman K.A. XX century and the moral values ​​of mankind. - M.: Thought, 1968; Arkhangelsky L.M. Value orientations and moral development of personality. - M.: "Knowledge", 1978; Zdravomyslov A.G. Needs. Interests. Values. - M.: Publishing house of political literature, 1986; Rich E.M. Feelings and things. - M.: Politizdat, 1975; Anisimov S.F. however, the results obtained have been little used in practice. The dominant ideology tried to absorb all the spiritual and value issues, especially the problem of the practical formation of values ​​and value attitudes among various social groups. Hence, apparently, that touch of abstractness and abstract reasoning, which are often found in the literature on the value problems of those years.

In the 1990s, the theoretical development of the problems of values ​​did not attract much attention from researchers (with the exception of the fundamental work of M.S. Kagan “The Philosophical Theory of Value”)1, it was mainly addressed by religious thinkers.2

The goals and objectives of the research are determined by the chosen subject of research, which can be defined as the value system of Russian society. The most important goal of the study is to find ways to overcome the crisis state of Russian society and integrate it into a single whole, through the analysis of the system of values ​​that unites all layers of society. The work involves a socio-philosophical analysis of Russian society from the point of view of the civilizational approach, the features of the formation and historical development the value systems of the Russian civilization as a whole and its regional sub-civilization - the Russian North.

The logic of the goal set predetermined the following specific research objectives:

Spiritual values: production and consumption. - M.: Thought, 1988; Kortava V.V. To the question of the value determination of consciousness. - Tbilisi: "Metsniereba" - 1987; Kagan M.S. Human activity. (Experience in system analysis). - M.: Politizdat, 1974.

1 Kagan M.S. Philosophical theory of value. - St. Petersburg: LLP TK "Petropolis", 1997.

2 See: (Krestyankin), Archimandrite John. Sermons. - M.: A new book, 1993; Men A.B. Be a Christian. - M: Anno Domini, 1994; Men A.B. Culture and spiritual ascent. - M.: Art, 1992.

Determine the nature of values;

Show the role of values ​​as the core, the basis for the existence of civilization;

To reveal the originality of Russian civilization, the features of the evolution of the system of values ​​in it;

Consider the problem of regional sub-civilizations within the framework of a single Russian civilization and show that each of them has its own historical path of formation and change of value orientations and preferences;

To give an analysis of the features of the formation of a new system of values ​​in Russian society.

The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that it: a) shows the course of formation of the system of values ​​of the Russian society, due to the nature of the interaction of society with the environment, the level of its economic, political and cultural development; b) the historical process of the formation of the Russian civilization is considered from the point of view of the value-semantic norms inherent in it, in the presence of the main system-forming value - the value of a strong state; c) the specificity of the Russian North in the general paradigm of the Russian civilization from the point of view of the adaptation of its population to the environment is revealed; c!) as a result, it was proved that the northern society consists of three social strata of the population, different in types of economy, which share the living space among themselves northern territories and in various ways fit into the all-Russian civilizational context; f) the conclusion is substantiated that the northern society forms a kind of sub-civilization, which is a peripheral part of the Russian one;

1) the concept of multi-level social integration of Russian society is proposed, consisting, on the one hand, of the vertical integration of regions-subcivilizations around the center, and on the other hand, of the horizontal integration of regions among themselves, moreover, vertical integration acts as a determining factor in relation to horizontal integration; g) formulated a new approach to solving the problem of formation modern system values ​​of Russian society, based on the need for an organic combination of all-Russian basic values ​​and the values ​​of the northern society, which has retained many features of traditional society.

Methodological and theoretical foundations research, in addition to the civilizational approach to the analysis of history indicated above, there are also systemic, comparative historical and sociocultural approaches. The use of these approaches in their totality makes it possible to identify the most significant trends in the general course of development of Russian society in the past and present, to outline ways for its consolidation based on the creation of an integral system of values.

The theoretical and practical significance of the work lies in the fact that its main provisions and conclusions can be used in determining ways to reform the socio-economic, political and spiritual spheres of life in Russian society, as well as in the development of regional programs for economic and cultural development.

The results obtained in the work can be used in methods for studying social processes at the regional level. A New Look on the relationship between the center and the regions makes it possible to outline specific ways to harmonize the existing tension between them, to promote the consolidation of the country.

Approbation of work. The dissertation was discussed at a meeting of the problem group of the Department of the History of Russian Statehood and Social Philosophical Thought and was recommended for defense. The main provisions and theoretical conclusions of the work are presented in publications.

The structure and scope of work correspond to the goals and objectives of the study. The thesis includes an introduction, three chapters, a conclusion and a bibliography. The first chapter is devoted to the problems of defining the concept of value, the main features of the formation and change of value systems in society, the increasing complexity of the place and functions of value systems as society develops. The second chapter of the dissertation examines the process of formation of the value system of Russian society in the course of its centuries-old historical development. The third chapter examines the historical path of development of the value system of the northern regions, as a well-established sub-civilization.

Dissertation conclusion on the topic "Social Philosophy", Yushkova, Yulia Gennadievna

Conclusion

This analysis of Russian society has revealed its main parameters, principles of functioning and the causes of internal contradictions that can be eliminated. Their elimination will entail the consolidation of his forces and potentialities.

The main source of contradictions is the relationship between the state and the people, which politically resulted in relations between the center and the regions, due to the fact that the center historically assumed all state-forming functions, and provided the regions with the functions of resource support for state building. This situation has developed historically on the basis of the extensive development of the country, which was determined by the initial poverty of the main source of resources, which until recently was agricultural production. The state kept the people and regions in this position with the help of a powerful state machine, which gives rise to a special Russian etatism. Its consequence was a split as a reaction of the people to such a technology of state administration.

The idea that unites the parties was and remains the idea of ​​a powerful state, hence the leading unifying value of the Russian system has become the value of a strong state, which includes the values ​​of security, stability of the international situation and internal affairs of the country. The success of the center in achieving the set goals made it possible to form within the borders of Russia, on the basis of the formed system of values, a special, very peculiar civilization.

Recently, there has been a turn in the general course of the country's development, due to Russia's entry into the stage of reform, as a result of which the main source of resources has changed and a general democratization of life has taken place. The inability of the state machine to adapt flexibly and quickly led to open tension between the center and the regions and split off a number of its peripheries from the core of civilization. The state, historically occupied with the process of reproduction of itself, did not agree to reduce its functions, did not give part of the power to the democratically prepared people and regions directly in time.

However, in the conditions of the development of a democratic society, there is no need to maintain the most powerful state machine, and the state-forming functions, the functions of civilizational bonds can move from a bureaucratic machine to an ideological one, working through high culture and the media. With a developed high culture and network higher education, a single information space, with the development of different sectors of the economy, the integration of the economic economy, the role of the state as the only guarantor of the integrity of the country can be reduced and brought into line with the real need for it.

Under these conditions, the national idea that binds the country becomes extremely important, but attempts to create it ran into opposition at the regional level. This could be expected, since in principle there was no idea of ​​a regional idea as an integral part of a national idea.

Now the ideological and philosophical life of the regions proceeds at the level of regional myths, more or less corresponding to the real socio-economic processes taking place in them. Until relatively recently, these processes took place within individual regions, but now they have gone beyond the framework of not only the regions, but also the country, which corresponds to the general logic of the development of world economic processes at the beginning of the 21st century, despite the fact that the role of the region as the subject of this process has increased, and the role of the center has a downward trend. The process of globalization and the process of individualization are dialectically related processes.

The question arises of what can serve as the basis for an ideological connection in a country that is breaking up into regions, subcultures, subcivilizations, social groups and personality, in a situation where pluralism is becoming an urgent requirement of the times. The analysis carried out showed that the basis of such a connection can be the initial Russian value a strong state, associated with a high economic potential and a level of well-being, a strong international position and, most importantly, a high ability to find consensus in a situation where the specific interests of various subjects do not coincide. With all the strength of the tendencies towards isolation, the regions, more than ever before, need a coordinating center that ensures the unity of space - economic, political, cultural, etc. New role the center will strengthen its position from the point of view of the core of civilization, which are more significant in the modern world than the positions of the bureaucratic machine.

The political expression of these principles of relations between the center and the regions are the principles of federalism, which implies a single form of government in all its subjects, economic responsibility and independence of the subject within its borders, and the regulatory role of the center. Within the framework of the federal economic model, it is possible to build a post-industrial society in which the post-material values ​​of the population dominate. It is within the framework of this society that it will be possible to overcome the ecological crisis, fundamentally different models of doing business will be found, and the former resource-intensive production will be gradually rebuilt. Accordingly, those Natural resources that are needed for the economy now will no longer be needed. This scenario makes Russia's transition to sustainable development possible.

It is worth noting that the principles of democratic communication, the economic independence of the regions, the increasing role of culture and education in the life of the population have led to the establishment of horizontal ties between the subjects of government, and this situation is true not only for Russia. In addition, the depletion of resource sources, environmental crises have led to the emergence of another challenge of nature to man, which he is able to solve only by combining efforts on the territorial principle. All this leads to the creation of sub-civilizations, which, being within the boundaries of the global civilization, create their own local value priorities that regulate their life. The pioneers of such a movement are the countries of the Arctic region, which, being one of the last raw materials and ecological reserves, poses its own challenge to the planet, the answer to which is a circumpolar civilization.

This picture corresponds to the motley picture of the post-industrial world, which is characterized by pluralism and multipolarity, dialectically interconnected with the growing degree of unification of mankind. The growing diversity of cultures and civilizations does not eliminate, but outlines more clearly the integrity of mankind, the laws of world history, the commonality of historical destinies in every small corner of the universe.

The national idea of ​​Russia, as a country-civilization, which includes several sub-civilizations, should have the attraction of a great civilizational idea, capable of combining sub-civilizational ideas. Its citizenship should be based on the principles of coordination of rights and obligations, responsibility and legal capacity of the regions among themselves and in relation to the center. The multipolarity of the world leads to the existence of attraction of its various centers, and regions, due to their geographical and industrial position, which are in a position equidistant™ from different poles of attraction, will tend to gravitate towards that pole, to that association, membership in which will promise greater stability and prosperity. This is as true for foreign as for domestic policy.

Despite such big problems for the center at this political moment, the missing link in the chain of stabilization is now at the regional level. The problem of the formation of a new system of regional values, understanding of regional subcultures and economic processes is far from its theoretical and practical solution, since it has not even been perceived as such in recent times.

The all-Russian value system should reflect the growing role of regional value systems and, above all, the northern society, which is the historical reserve of Russian statehood.

Modern high technologies open up entirely new possibilities for effective use this experience in solving acute modern economic, political and social problems of the Russian North. But this task is not only technological, it is, first of all, a philosophical task associated with understanding real ways and means of giving the disparate value orientations of the northern society a systemic character.

List of references for dissertation research candidate of philosophical sciences Yushkova, Yulia Gennadievna, 2000

1. Avanesova G.A. The core-periphery and the processes of regionalization of culture // Comparative study of civilizations: Reader: Proc. A manual for university students / Comp., ed. and intro. Art. B.S. Erasov. Moscow: Aspect Press, 1999; pp. 186-190.

2. Akaimov. P. From Reykjavik to Salekhard: What was discussed at the PAR conference // Russian Federation Today, 1998 No. 10; pp. 35-36.

3. Aksyuchits V. Atheistic ideology. State. Church // Russian Diaspora in the Year of the Millennium of the Baptism of Rus': Collection. -M.: Capital, 1991 - 464 p.

4. Alekseeva T.A. Is philosophy necessary for politics? M.: Editorial URSS, 2000. - 128 p.

5. Alekseeva T.A., Kapustin B.G., Pantin I.K. Prospects for Integrative Ideology (Abstracts) // Political Studies 1997 No. 3; pp. 17-22.

6. Anisimov S.F. Spiritual values: production and consumption. M.: Thought, 1988. - 253 p.

7. Arkhangelsk JI. M. Value orientations and moral development of personality. Moscow: Knowledge, 1978. 64 p.

8. Akhiezer A. S. Legal and historical and cultural problems of dual power in Russia http://scd.plus.centro.ru/mnf.htm

9. Akhiezer. A. S. Problems of state power in Russia.// Frontiers -1996, No. 1; pp. 84-109.

10. Akhiezer A. S. Russia: criticism of historical experience. T.I. M.: Publishing House of the Philosophical Society of the USSR, 1991. - 318 p.

11. Akhiezer A. S. Russia: criticism of historical experience. (Sociocultural Dictionary). Volume III. M.: Publishing House of the Philosophical Society of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1991.-470 p.

12. Akhiezer A. S. The specifics of the historical path of Russia, http: //www. Iibertarium.ru/libertarium/llibahies3

13. Babakov V. G. Crisis ethnic groups - M.: IFRAN, 1993. 183 p.

14. Baranov Vladimir. Exodus // Computerra. (Computer Weekly) January 18, 2000 No. 2; pp.35-37.

15. Barents Euro-Arctic region. Regional Council. Activity Report 1996 Luleå (Sweden) 1997.

16. Barents Program 1994/1995. International organization Barents Euro-Arctic region.

17. Belenkina T. I. Lay-off crafts of the peasants of the Komi region in the first half of the 19th century // Questions of the history of the Komi ASSR. Proceedings of IYALI Komi Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Issue 16. Syktyvkar, 1975.

18. Berdyaev N. A. The sin of war. M.: Culture, 1993. - 272 p.

19. Berdyaev N. A. On the appointment of a person. M.: Respublika, 1993. - 383 p. - (B-ka ethical thought)

20. Berdyaev N. A. The fate of Russia. M .: Soviet writer, 1990. - 346 p.

21. Berdyaev N. A. Philosophy of freedom. The origins and meaning of Russian communism. M .: CJSC "Svarog and K", - 1997. - 415 p.

22. Brzezinski 3. Grand chessboard. American dominance and its strategic imperatives. M.: International relations, 1998. -256 p.

23. Rich E. M. Feelings and things. M.: Politizdat, 1975. 304 p.

24. Borev Yu. B. Aesthetics. 4th ed., add. - M.: Politizdat, 1988. -496 e.: ill.

25. The future of Russia and the latest sociological approaches. All-Russian scientific conference. Abstracts of reports. Moscow. February 10-12, 1997. 26 p.

26. Be a face: the values ​​of civil society. / Ed. IN AND. Bakshtanovsky, Yu.V. Sogomonova, V.A. Churilova. Volume I. Tomsk: Publishing House Vol. university 1993. - 259 p.

27. Byzov L. Formation of a new political identity in post-Soviet Russia: the evolution of socio-political orientations and public demand http://pubs.carnegie.ru/books/ 1999/09ag/02.azr

28. Valentey S. D. Federalism: Russian history and Russian reality. M.: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1998. - 132p.

29. Vapentey. S., Nesterov L. Global and Russian trends in the accumulation of social wealth // Federalism 1999. No. 3; S. 6990.

30. Vasilenko I.A. Dialogue of Civilizations: Sociocultural Problems of Political Partnership. M.: Editorial URSS, 1999. - 272 p.

31. Vahtre L. History of Estonian culture. Short review. Tallinn: Jaan Tõnisson Institute, 1994. - 229p.

32. Vernadsky V.I. Beginning and eternity of life. M: "Soviet Russia" 1989. -703s.

33. Vernadsky. IN AND. Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon / Otv. ed. A.L. Yanshin; Foreword A.L. Yanshin, F.T., Yangshina.; Academy of Sciences of the USSR M.: Nauka, 1991, - 270 p.

34. Vernadsky G.V. Ancient Rus': Per. from English. Tver: LEAN; M.: AGRAF, 1996. - 447p. - (History of Russia, vol. 1.)

35. Vernadsky G.V. Russian historiography. M.: AGRAF, 1998. - 447 p. -(New story).

36. Vilchek G. The harsh reality of the Arctic: about the problems of sustainable development of the Arctic // Eurasia: environmental monitoring, 1996 No. 2; pp. 8-18.

37. Windelband V. History of Philosophy: Per. with him. K .: Nika-center, 1997. 560 p. - (Series "Knowledge"; Issue 5).

38. Windelband V. From Kant to Nietzsche / Per. with him. Ed. A.I. Vvedensky M.: "Kanon-press", 1998. - 496 p. - ("The Canon of Philosophy"),

39. Windelband V. Philosophy of culture and transcendental idealism / Culturology. XX century: Anthology M.: Lawyer, 1995; S. 5768.

40. Vlasov P. Peace in the Barents Sea: American-Norwegian negotiations // Expert, 1999. No. 40; pp. 16-17.

41. Volkov V.V. Monopoly on violence and hidden fragmentation of the Russian state. (Research hypothesis) // Political research 1998. No. 5; pp. 39-47.

42. Gaman Golutvina O.V. Political elites Russia. - M.: Intellect, 1998.-415 p.

43. Gachev G.D. National images of the world. America in comparison with Russia and the Slavs. M.: Raritet, 1997. - 680 p.

44. Gellner E. Nations and nationalism. Per. from English. ed. and after. I.I. Krupnik. M.: Progress, 1991. - 320 p.

45. Glushenkova E. Global crisis of civilization, sustainable development and political future of Russia http://www.ccsis.msk.ru/ Russia/4/Glob33 .htm

47. Golubchikov Yu.N. Russian North in modern geopolitics // Social sciences and modernity, 1999. No. 1; pp. 125-130.

48. Golts G.A. Culture and Economics: Search for Relationships // Social Sciences and Modernity, 2000. No. 1; pp. 23-35.

49. Golts G.A. On the universal and specific in the history of Russia. / Sociocultural methodology for analyzing Russian society. Independent theoretical seminar No. 21. October 21, 1998 http://scd.plus.centro.ru/23.htm

50. City in the Arctic and the environment. Abstracts of the International Conference. Syktyvkar, 1994 -112p.

51. Gumilyov JI.H. From Rus' to Russia: Essays on Ethnic History. / Aftermath. S.B. Lavrov. M.: Ekopros, 1992. - 336 p.

52. Gumilev JT.H. Rhythms of Eurasia: Epochs and Civilizations / Foreword. S.B. Lavrov. M.: Ekopros, 1993. - 576 p.

53. Danilevsky N.Ya. Russia and Europe / Compiled, foreword. and comments by S.A. Vaigacheva, - M .: Book, 1991, - 574 p.

54. Dean K. Delis, K. Philips. The paradox of passion: she loves him, but he does not: Per. from English. M.: "MIRT", 1994. - 447 p. ("The path to success = The path to happiness"),

55. Dynamics of the values ​​of the population of reformed Russia. / RAN. Institute of Philosophy; resp. ed. N.I. Lapin, L.A. Belyaev. M.: Editorial URSS, 1996.-224 p.

56. Diogenes Laertecius. On the life, teachings and sayings of famous philosophers / Ed. volumes and ed. intro. Art. A.F. Losev; Translation by M.L. Gasparov. 2nd ed. - M.: Thought, - 1986. - 571 p. - (Philos. heritage).

57. Spiritual arrangement of Russia. Collection. Kursk: GUIPP "Kursk", 1996. - 224 p.

58. Esakov V.A. The city as a social reality. Dissertation for the degree of Cand. philosophical sciences. M. RAGS, 1999. -144 p.

59. Erasov B. S. Spiritual foundations and dynamics of Russian civilization. http://scd.plus. centro.ru/7. htm

60. Erasov B.S. On the geopolitical and civilizational structure of Eurasia // Civilizations and Cultures. Scientific almanac. Issue. 3. Russia and the East: geopolitics and civilizational relations. M.: Publishing House of the Institute of Oriental Studies, 1996. - 415 e.; pp. 86-102.

61. Erasov B.S. Civilization theory and Eurasian studies // Civilizations and cultures. Scientific almanac. Issue. 3. Russia and the East: geopolitics and civilizational relations. M.: Publishing House of the Institute of Oriental Studies, 1996, - 415 e.; pp. 3-28.

62. Erasov B.S., Avanesova G.A. Problems of Analysis of the Center-Periphery Dyad of Civilizations // Comparative Study of Civilizations: A Reader: Proc. A manual for university students / Comp., ed. and intro. Art. B.S. Erasov. Moscow: Aspect Press, 1999; pp. 180-183.

63. Life values ​​of Russians: is our mentality changing? http://www.nns.ru/analytdoc/doclacß.html

64. Zayfudim P. X. Health of the owners of the North. http://mfV.samovar.ru/library/nl4/north.html

65. Zdravomyslov A.G. Needs. Interests. Values. M .: Publishing house of political literature, 1986, - 221 p.

66. Zotova Z.M. Optimization of the relationship between the center and regions // Political research 1998. No. 3; pp. 204-207.

67. Zyryanov P.N. Stolypin and the fate of the Russian village // Social sciences and modernity, 1991. No. 4; pp. 114 124.

68. Ilyenkov E.V. Philosophy and culture. M .: Politizdat, 1991. - 464 p. - (Thinkers of the XX century).

69. Ilyin V.V. Philosophy: A textbook for universities, - M .: Academic project, 1999, - 592 p.

70. Ilyin V.V., Akhiezer A.S. Russian statehood: origins, traditions, prospects. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1997. - S.384.

71. Ilyin V.V., Panarin A.S. Philosophy of politics. M: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1994.-283 p.

72. Ionov I.N. Paradoxes of Russian civilization (in the wake of one scientific discussion) // Social Sciences and Modernity 1999 No. 5; pp. 115-127.

73. Kagan M.S. Human activity. (Experience in system analysis). -M.: Politizdat, 1974 328s.

74. Kagan. M.S. Philosophical theory of value. St. Petersburg: LLP TK "Petropolis", 1997. - 205 p.

75. Kamkin A.B. Public life of the northern village of the 18th century (ways and forms of peasant public service). / Textbook for the special course. Vologda. 1990. - 96 p.

76. Kant. I. Works in 8 volumes, - M .: "Choro" 1994, v. 4 630 e.; v.8 - 718 p.

77. Kapustin B.G. Ideology and Politics in Post-Communist Russia. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2000. 136 p.

78. Kent R. Salamina. / Per. from English, ed., afterword. and note. N. Ya Bolotnikova. Rice. Author. M.: Thought, 1970. - 383 p.

79. Clement O. Questions about a person // Russian abroad in the year of the millennium of the baptism of Rus': Collection. M.: Capital, 1991, - 464 p.

80. Klyuchevsky V.O. Works. In 9 volumes. V.2. Russian history course. 4.2 / Post-final and comment. compiled by V.A. Aleksandrov, V.G. Zimin. M.: Thought, 1987. - 447 p.

81. Klyuchevsky V.O. Works. In 9 vols. T.Z. Russian history course. Ch.Z / Ed. VL Yanina; Afterword and comment. compiled by V.A. Aleksandrov, V.G. Zimin. M.: Thought, 1988. - 414 p.

82. Kovalskaya G. I will not choose young // Results. (Weekly magazine) November 16, 1999 No. 46; pp. 20-25.

83. Kolesnikov P.A. Northern Rus' (Archival sources on the history of the peasantry and Agriculture XVIII century) Vologda, 1971.-208 p.

84. Kolesnikov P.A. Northern Rus'. Issue 2. (Archival sources on the history of the European North Russia XVIII century) Vologda, 1973. -223s.

85. Konovalov V. Does Russia need to develop and protect the North? // Dialogue, 1999 No. 6; S.62-73.

86. Conflicts and consent in modern Russia (Social-philosophical analysis). M.: IFRAN, 1998. - 160 p.

87. The concept of state national policy Russian Federation. Materials of parliamentary hearings. March 19, 1996. -M.: Izvestia, 1996. 96 p.

88. Kortava V.V. To the question of the value determination of consciousness. -Tbilisi: "Metsniereba", 1987. 64 p.

89. Kostomarov N.I. Home life and customs of the Great Russian people / Compilation, preface, notes C.J1. Nikolaev. M.: Economics, 1993. - 399 p.

90. Kotlobay JI. Shamanism as a socio-cultural phenomenon of folk culture. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of philosophical sciences M. RAGS, 1995. - 135 p.

91. Kotov P.P. Non-agricultural occupations of the population of the Komi region in the late 18th - first half of the 19th centuries. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkar State University, 1999. - 29s.

92. Kradin H.H. Nomadism in civilizational and formational development // Civilizations. Issue. 3. M.: Nauka, 1995. - 234 e.; pp.164-179.

93. Crisis society. Our society in three dimensions. M.: IFRAN, 1994. 245s.

94. Kuznetsov H.A. Information interactions in nature, society, technology. // II All-Russian Scientific Conference " Russia XXI century” Moscow 1999 Abstracts; pp. 121-124.

95. Culturology. XX century: Anthology M.: Lawyer, 1995. -703 p. - (Faces of culture).

96. Culturology. History of World Culture: Textbook for Universities / A.N. Markova, L.A. Nikitich, N.S. Krivtsova and others; Ed. prof. A.N. Markova.- M.: Culture and sport, UNITI, 1995. 224 p.

97. Lebon. G. Psychology of peoples and masses. St. Petersburg: Model, 1995. - 316 p.

98. Leybin V.M. Freud, psychoanalysis and modern Western philosophy. Moscow: Politizdat, 1990. - 397 e.: photo.

99. YUZ. Leisio T. Self-consciousness and national survival (on the example of forest Finns) // Finno-Ugric studies, 1994, No. 2 (Yoshkar-Ola); pp. 84-89.

100. Linz X., Stepan. A. Statehood, nationalism and democratization // Political studies 1997 No. 5; S. 9 30.

101. Lorenz K. The reverse side of the mirror: Per. with him. / Ed. A.B. Smooth; Comp. A.B. Gladky, A.I. Fedorov; Afterword by A.I. Fedorov. M.: Respublika, 1998. - 393 p. (Thinkers of the XX century).

102. Losev A.F. Dare spirit. M.: Politizdat, 1988. - 336 p. - (Personality. Morality. Education).

103. Lossky N.O. Character of the Russian people. Book one. Reprint reproduction of the 1957 edition of "Posev" M .: Publishing House "Key", 64 p.

104. Lurie C.B. Perception by the people of the developed territory // Social sciences and modernity, 1998. No. 5; pp. 61-74.

105. Lurie C.B. Nationalism, ethnicity, culture. Categories of science and historical practice // Social sciences and modernity, 1999. No. 4, pp. 101-111.

106. Lyaporov V. Digital world. New person? // Computerra. (Computer Weekly) January 11, 2000 No. 1; pp. 24-25.

107. Sh. Mainov V. The Forgotten River // Monuments of the Fatherland. Komi land. Almanac of the All-Russian Society for the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments, 1996, No. 36; pp.74-82.

108. Malthus T.R. Experience on the law of population // Anthology of economic classics. In 2 volumes T.2. M .: "Economy", 1992, - 486s.

109. Mamardashvili. M. Kantian variations. M.: Agraf, 1997, - 320 p.

110. Mamut L.S. State in the value dimension. M.: Publishing house NORMA, 1998.-48 p.

111. Mamut L.S. The Image of the State as an Algorithm of Political Behavior // Social Sciences and Modernity, 1998. No. 6, S. 8597.

112. Martynov A.S., Vinogradov V.G. Dominant types of nature management cultures and relationships with nature. http://www.sci.aha.ru/ATL/ra22a.htm

113. Makhnach V. Other. Anthology of the new Russian self-consciousness. Russia in the XX century (Diagnosis of a cultural historian). http://www.russ.ru/ antolog/inoe/mahnach.htm/mahnach.htm

114. Mezhuev V.M. Russian path of civilizational development // Power 1996. No. 11; P. 41-50.

115. Milov JI. B. Natural and climatic factor and features of the Russian historical process// Issues of history 1992 No. 4 -5; pp. 37-56.

116. Mitrokhin S.S. State policy and society's values ​​// Political studies 1997. No. 1; pp.34-36.

117. Nazaretyan A. P. Aggression, morality and crises in the development of world culture. (Synergetics of the social process). - M .: Association "Knizhnik", 1995. 163 p.

118. Naishul V.A. On the norms of modern Russian statehood, http: // www.inme.ru./norms.htm

119. There are no small nations / Comp. E.S. Korobov. M .: Young Guard, 1991. - 206 p. ill.

120. Nikolaev M. The Arctic in the value system of the planet http://sl.vntic.org.ru/Resurs/8.htm

121. Nietzsche. F. Works in 2 volumes; v.2 M.: Thought, 1997. - 829 p.

122. Nietzsche F. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. M.: Progress, 1994. - 512p.

123. Nietzsche F. Will to power. The experience of reassessing all values ​​http://www.skrijali.ru/Nietzshepage/N-Volya.htm

124. Ortega-i Gasset X. Selected works: Per. from Spanish / Comp., foreword. and general ed. A.M. Rutkevich. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishing House, 1997. - 704 p.

125. Panarin A.S. Global political forecasting in conditions of political instability. M.: Editorial URSS, 1999. - 272 p.

126. Panarin A.S. To the reconstruction of the second world http://www.russ.ni/antolog/inoe/panar.htm

127. Pek M.S. Untraveled paths. New psychology of love, traditional values ​​and spiritual growth: Per. from English. H.H. Mikhailov. M.: Avicenna, UNITI, 1996. - 301 p. - (Foreign bestseller).

128. Penkov V.F., Kovrikova O.I. On the value orientations of the electorate (on the materials of sociological research in the Tambov region) / Edited by Professor Z.M. Zotova. Tambov, 1998. - 83 p.

129. Penkov E.M. social norms regulators of personal behavior. Some questions of methodology and theory. - M.: Thought, 1972. - 198 p.

130. Peccei A. Human qualities/ Per. from English. O.V. Zakharova. Tot. ed. and intro. Art. D.M. Gvishiani. Ed. 2. M.: Progress, 1985 - 312 p.

131. Pivovarov Yu. Fursov A. Russian System. // Frontiers 1995 No. 6; pp. 44-65.

132. Plekhanov G.V. Letters without an address. / Works. t.XIV. Ed. D. Ryazanova. M.: State Publishing House, 1925. - 350 p.

133. Plekhanov G.V. What is the dispute about? / Works. t.H. M.-JI. : State Publishing House, 1925; pp. 399 407.

134. Plyusnin Yu. M. Psychology of survival. Worldview and social dispositions of the Pomor population of the Russian North. http://www.philosophy.nsc.ru/life/journals/humscience/l97/16plus. htm

135. By road V. Phenomenology of the body. Introduction to philosophical anthropology. Materials of lecture courses 1992 -1994. M.: Ad Marginem, 1995. -339 p.

136. Political centrism in Russia M.: Fund for the development of political centrism, 1999. - 123 p.

137. Polyakov JI.B. Methodology for the study of Russian modernization // Political Studies 1997 No. 3; pp.5-15.

138. Prokhorov B.B. Russia is a northern country. North in anthropoecological terms. http://www.sci.aha.ru/ATL/rallc.htm

139. Pryanishnikov N. Region. Culture. Development, http://www.ndm.ru/fest/doklad/prianishnikov.htm

140. Putin V. V. Russia at the turn of the millennium http://pravitelstvo.gov.ru/ goverment/minister/article-wpl .html

141. Reflections on Russia and Russians. Strokes to the portrait of the Russian national character / Comp. and foreword. S. K. Ivanova. Tit. ed. Yu.P. Senokosov. M.: Pravda International, 1996, - 464 p. - (Distant ancestors: 1-15 centuries. Issue 1).

142. Rickert G. Natural sciences and cultural sciences // Culturology. XX century: Anthology M.: Lawyer, 1995; pp. 69-103.

143. Rickert G. Philosophy of life: Per. with him. K.: Nika-center, 1998. -512 p. - (Series "Knowledge"; Issue 6).

144. Rickert G. Philosophy of history: Per. with him. S. Gessen St. Petersburg, 1908, - 154 p.

145. Rosales H.M. Education of civic identity: on the relationship between nationalism and patriotism // Political research 1999. No. 6; pp. 93-104.

146. Russia between Europe and Asia: Eurasian temptation: An anthology. / RAN. Institute of Philosophy; M.: Nauka, 1993. - 368 p. - (Russian sources of modern social philosophy).

147. Savitsky P.N. Eurasianism as a historical design // Social theory and modernity. Release. 18. Eurasian project of modernization of Russia: "for" and "against". - M.: Publishing house of the RAGS, 1995; S. 197213.

148. Savitsky P.N. Eurasian concept of Russian history // Social theory and modernity. Release. 18. Eurasian project of modernization of Russia: "for" and "against". - M.: Publishing house of the RAGS, 1995; pp.214-217.

149. Sazonov Yu. Screaming problems of the silent North // Parliamentary newspaper October 29, 1999. No. 206, p.3.

150. Svanidze A.A. To the problem of continuity and interrelation of civilizations // Civilizations. Issue 3 M .: Nauka, 1995, - 234 e.; pp. 199 -202.

151. Northern forum; materials http://www.nothernforum.org

152. Seytov A. Problems of management in the XXI century (according to the materials of the Club of Rome) // Social Sciences and Modernity 1992 No. 4: P.97 109.

153. Semennikova L.I. Russia in the World Community of Civilizations: Textbook for Universities. Ed. 3rd, revised. and additional - Bryansk: "Kursiv", 1999. - 558 p.

154. Siberian. V. A. Changing social values ​​of youth. (Experience of comparative analysis) http:// www.soc.pn.ru/ publications/vestnik/ 1997/2/sibirev.html

155. Sidorov A.S. Witchcraft, sorcery and magic. Materials on the psychology of witchcraft. SP b: Aleteyya, 1997. - 272 p.

156. Smith A. Theory of moral feelings / Entry. Art. B.V. Meerovsky; Prep. text, comments A.F. Gryaznov. M.: Respublika, 1997. - 351 p. (B-ka ethical thought).

157. Soloviev S.M. Works. In 18 books. Book. IV. History of Russia since ancient times. T. 7-8 / Resp. Ed.: I.D. Kovalchenko, S.S. Dmitriev. M.: Thought, 1989, - 752 p.

158. Soloviev S.M. Works. In 18 books. Book. VII. T. 13-14. History of Russia since ancient times Rev. Ed.: I.D. Kovalchenko, S.S. Dmitriev. -M.: Thought, 1991. 701 p.

159. Sorokin P.A. About the Russian nation. Russia and America / Compiled, author introd. Art. E.S. Troitsky M. 1992, 114 p.

160. Sorokin PA Public textbook of sociology. Articles of different years / Institute of Sociology. M.: Nauka, 1994. - 560 p. - (Sociological heritage).

161. Sorokin P.A. Human. Civilization. Society / Ed. and with preface. and comp. A.Yu. Sogomonov. -M.: Politizdat, 1992. 542 p.

162. Social theory and modernity. Release. 18. The Eurasian project of modernization of Russia: "for" and "against", - M.: Publishing house of the RAGS, 1995, - 222 p.

163. Sociocultural methodology for the analysis of Russian society. Independent theoretical seminar http://scd.plus.centro.ru

164. Society of the XXI century: market, firm, person in the information society / ed. A.I. Kolganov. M.: Faculty of Economics, TNIS, 1998.-279 p.

165. Comparative study of civilizations: Reader: Proc. A manual for university students / Comp., ed. and intro. Art. B.C. Erasov. M.: Aspect Press, 1999.- 556 p.

166. Starikov E. Various Russians // New world, No. 4, 1996; pp. 160 172.

167. Sychev Yu.V. Human Being: Problems of Determination and Self-Determination // Social Theory and Modernity / RAU, Humanitarian Center, Dept. philosophy. M., 1992. - Issue 5. - 99s.

168. Sychenkova E.V. Council of the Barents / Euro-Arctic region: features of foreign policy and foreign economic relations. Diss. for an apprenticeship step, candidate of political sciences: M., RAGS 1998, - 152 p.

169. Tavadov G.T. Ethnology: a dictionary-reference book. M.: Sots. watered, journal., 1988.- 688 p.

170. Terra incognita of the Arctic / Ed.-comp. Tolkachev V.F. Arkhangelsk: Publishing House of the Pomor Pedagogical University, 1996. - 303p.

171. Tinbergen N. Animal behavior: Per. from English. / Foreword. K.E. Fabry. M.: Mir. 1985 .- 192 p. ill.

172. Titkov A.S. Images of regions in the Russian mass consciousness // Political studies 1999. No. 3; pp. 61-75.

173. Tishkov V. The phenomenon of separatism // Federalism 1999 No. 3; pp. 5-32.

174. Toynbee A. J. Comprehension of history: Per. from English. / Comp. Ogurtsov A.P.; Intro. Art. Ukolova V.I.; Conclusion Art. Rashkovsky E.B. M.: Progress, 1991, - 736 p.

175. Toffler E., Toffler X. Creation of a new civilization. Third Wave Policy http://www.freenet.bishkek.su/jornal/n5/ЖNAL51 l.htm

176. Tugarinov VP Selected Philosophical Works. D .: Publishing house of the Leningrad University., 1988. - 344 p.

177. Ushakov V. Unthinkable Russia. Other. Reader of the New Russian Identity, http:// www.russ.rii/ antolog/inoe/ ushak.htm/ ushak.htm

178. Fedotov G.P. The fate and sins of Russia / selected articles on the philosophy of Russian history and culture /: In 2 vols / Compiled, introductory article, notes Boykov V.F. St. Petersburg: Sofia, 1991. - 352 e.: portrait

179. Fedotova V.G. Anarchy and order. M.: Editorial URSS, 2000. -144 p.

180. Fedotova V.G. Modernization of the "other" Europe. M.: IFRAN, 1997 -255 p.

181. Theophrastus. Characters. Per., Art. and notes by G.A. Stratanovsky. -M.: Scientific and publishing center "Ladomir", 1993. 123 p.

182. Philosophy of culture. Formation and development. St. Petersburg: Lan publishing house, 1998.-448 p.

183. Philosophy: bases of social forecasting. M: Publishing House of the RAGS, 1996. - 240 p.

184. Frank S.L. Spiritual foundations in the life of society. M.: Respublika, 1992.-511 p.

185. Frank S.L. Reality and man. / Comp. P.V. Alekseev; Note. R.K. Medvedeva. M.: Respublika, 1997. - 479 p. - (Thinkers of the XX century).

186. Fromm E. Psychoanalysis and ethics. M.: Respublika, 1993. - 415 p. - (B-ka ethical thought).

187. Fukuyama F. Confucianism and Democracy http://www.russ.ru/journal predely/97-l l-25/fuku.htm

188. Fursov A. Bells of history // Frontiers 1995 No. 2; pp. 3-31.

189. Habermas. Y. Democracy. Intelligence. Moral. M.: Nauka, 1992. -176 p.

190. Heidegger M. European nihilism http://www.skrijali.ru/Nietzshe page/Heidegger.htm

191. Huntington S. Clash of Civilizations? // Political research 1994, No. 1; pp. 33-48.

192. Huntington S. The clash of civilizations and the rebuilding of the world order http://www.mss.rn/joumal/peresmot/97-10-15/hantin.htm

193. Khord D. Modern classification of civilizations // Comparative study of civilizations M.: Aspect Press, 1999; pp. 279-280.

194. Tsymbursky V.L. Russia Land Beyond the Great Limitrophe: Civilization and Its Geopolitics. - M.: Editorial URSS, 2000. - 144 p.

195. Tsyurupa A.I. Alaska, Kamchatka and Siberia in the geopolitical area // Political research 1998. No. 2; pp. 83-87.

196. Chernyshov A.G. The center of the province in the regional self-consciousness // Political studies 1999. No. 3; pp. 100-104.

197. What is the Barents Euro-Arctic region? Some facts and region. Information material. Published by the Barents Regional Secretariat. Lulea, Sweden. November 1996

198. Chuprov V.V. Land provision of peasant farms of the North at the beginning of the 20th century. // The economy of the northern peasantry in the XIX-beginning of the XX centuries. Intercollegiate collection scientific papers. Syktyvkar 1987, - 122p.

199. Chuprov I. Opinion of the deputy I. Chuprov. Speech at a meeting on May 23, 1768 // Selected works of Russian thinkers of the second half of the 18th century. In 2 vols. M.: State publishing house of political literature, 1952; v.2 p.73-77.

200. Chukhina L.A. Man and his valuable world in religious philosophy. 2nd ed., revised. and additional - Riga: Zinatne, 1991. - 303 p.

201. Shangina V.V. Communal land use in the former state village of the Komi region in the post-reform years of the 19th century // The economy of the northern peasantry in XIX- early XX centuries Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Syktyvkar 1987. 122 p.

202. Shapovalov V.F. Perception of Russia in the West: Myths and Reality // Social Sciences and Modernity, 2000. No. 1, pp. 51-67.

203. Shapovalov V.F. Fundamentals of philosophy. From Classics to Modernity: Textbook for Universities. M.: FAIR - PRESS, 1999. - 576 p.

204. Shapovalov V.F. Fundamentals of modern philosophy. To the results of the XX century: A course of lectures for students and graduate students of humanitarian specialties of universities. M.: Flinta: Nauka, 1998. - 272 p.

205. Shapovalov V.F. Russian Studies as a Complex Scientific Discipline // Social Sciences and Modernity. 1994 No. 2; pp.37-46.

206. Shevchenko V.N. The Crisis of Consciousness of the Intelligentsia: What's Next? // Centaur 1992 No. 11-12; pp.8-16.

207. Shevchenko V.N. Prospects for the humanization of Russian society // Humanism at the turn of the millennium: idea, fate, perspective / Editorial Board: B.N. Bessonov, T.G. Bogatyrev, V.N. Shevchenko (executive editor) M.: Gnosis, 1997; pp.56-64.

208. Shchedrovitsky P. Russian world. // Independent newspaper. February 11, 2000. No. 25 (2087).

209. Scheler M. Selected works: Per. from German / Per. Denezhkina A.V., Malinkina A.N., Filippova A.F.; Ed. Denezhkina A.B. M.: Gnosis Publishing House, 1994. - 490 p.

210. Shils E. Society and societies: a macro-sociological approach // Comparative study of civilizations: Reader: Proc. A manual for university students / Comp., ed. and intro. Art. B.S. Erasov. M.: Aspect Press, 1999. - 556 p.

211. Shishkin A.F., Shvartsman K.A. XX century and the moral values ​​of mankind. M., "Thought", 1968. 271 p.

212. Shkolenko Yu.A. Values ​​of the 20th century. M.: Knowledge, 1990. - 64 p. - (New in life, science, technology. Ser. "Theory and practice of socialism"; No. 6).

213. Spengler O. Decline of Europe: Essays on the morphology of world history: Gestalt and reality / Per. with him., intro. Art. and note. K.A. Svasyan. M.: Thought, 1993. - 666 p.

214. Yurechko O.N. The world of values ​​as a factor of human socialization. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of philosophical sciences. Moscow, RAGS, 1995. - 140 p.

215. Yadov V.A. Social theories on the threshold of the 21st century: crisis, discourse or integration? // The future of Russia and the latest sociological approaches. All-Russian scientific conference. Abstracts of reports. Moscow. February 10-12, 1997; pp. 3-4.

216. Yakovenko I. Gr. Power in Russian traditional culture: experience of cultural analysis. Sociocultural methodology for the analysis of Russian society. Independent theoretical seminar №3 Moscow June 26, 1996 http://scd.plus.centro.ni/3.htm

217. Yakovenko I.G. Confrontation as a Form of Dialogue (A Dynamic Aspect of Western Perception). // Frontiers 1995 No. 6; pp. 106-123.

218. Yakovenko I.G. Russia's Past and Present: Imperial Ideal and National Interest// Political Studies 1997. No. 4.1. pp.88-96.

219. Yakovets Yu.V. Path to partnership of local civilizations // Local civilizations in the 21st century: clash or partnership? Materials for X interdisciplinary discussion. Kostroma, May 21, 1998 - M: 1998, - 142 p.

220. Yanov A.L. Methodology for the study of political tradition in Russia. Sociocultural methodology for the analysis of Russian society. Independent theoretical seminar. Moscow June 10, 1998 http://scd.plus.centro.ru/22.htm

221. Literature on foreign languages:

222. Charles A. Kupchan. Introduction: Nationalism resurgent // Nationalism and nationality in the new Europe. Edited by Charles A. Kupchan. Cornell university press. Ithaca and London. 1995. 224p.

223. Britain's Ethnic Minorities. Produced for the Foreing & Commonwealth Office. Printed in England: IB/ 2050 January 1993.

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for review and obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors related to the imperfection of recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in the PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

Basic national values ​​- the basic moral values, priority moral attitudes that exist in the cultural, family, socio-historical, religious traditions of the multinational people of the Russian Federation, transmitted from generation to generation and ensuring the successful development of the country in modern conditions;

Patriotism as one of the manifestations of a person's spiritual maturity, expressed in love for Russia, the people, a small homeland, in a conscious desire to serve the Fatherland.

Labor and creativity as distinctive features of a spiritually and morally developed personality.

The family as the basis of the spiritual and moral development and education of the individual, the guarantee of the continuity of the cultural and moral traditions of the peoples of Russia from generation to generation and the viability of Russian society.

Nature as one of the most important foundations for a healthy and harmonious life of man and society.

A healthy lifestyle in the unity of its components: physical, mental, spiritual and social and moral health.

Basic national values ​​are derived from national life Russia in all its historical and cultural completeness, ethnic diversity. In the sphere of national life, one can single out the sources of morality and humanity, i.e. those areas of social relations, activity and consciousness, relying on which allows a person to resist destructive influences and productively develop his consciousness, life, the very system of social relations.

The traditional sources of morality are: Russia, the multinational people of the Russian Federation, civil society, family, labor, art, science, religion, nature, humanity.

According to the traditional sources of morality, the basic national values ​​are determined, each of which is revealed in the system moral values(views):

  • * patriotism - love for Russia, for one's people, for one's small Motherland, serving the Fatherland;
  • * social solidarity - personal and national freedom, trust in people, institutions of the state and civil society, justice, mercy, honor, dignity;
  • * citizenship - serving the Fatherland, the rule of law, civil society, law and order, multicultural world, freedom of conscience and religion;
  • * family - love and fidelity, health, prosperity, respect for parents, care for older and younger, care for procreation;
  • * work and creativity - respect for work, creativity and creation, purposefulness and perseverance;
  • * science - the value of knowledge, the pursuit of truth, scientific picture peace;
  • * traditional Russian religions - ideas about faith, spirituality, religious life a person, the values ​​of the religious worldview, tolerance, formed on the basis of interfaith dialogue;
  • * art and literature - beauty, harmony, spiritual world human, moral choice, meaning of life, aesthetic development, ethical development;
  • * nature - evolution, native land, reserved nature, planet Earth, ecological consciousness;
  • * humanity - world peace, diversity of cultures and peoples, progress of mankind, international cooperation.

Basic national values ​​underlie the integral space of spiritual and moral development and education of schoolchildren, i.e. the way of life school life, which determines the lesson, extracurricular and extracurricular activities of students. The organization of such a space and its full functioning requires the coordinated efforts of all social subjects participating in education: families, public organizations, including children's and youth movements and organizations, institutions of additional education, culture and sports, the media, traditional Russian religious associations. The leading, meaningfully determining role in the creation of the way of school life belongs to the subjects of the educational process.

The system of basic national values ​​underlies the idea of ​​a single nation and the readiness of the main social forces for civil consolidation based on common values ​​and social meanings in solving national problems, including the upbringing of children and youth.

Achieving civil agreement on basic national values ​​will strengthen the unity of the Russian educational space, give it openness, dialogue, cultural and social dynamism.

Civil agreement on basic national values ​​has nothing to do with the uniformity of the values ​​of the nation and the nation itself, spiritual and social unification. The unity of the nation is achieved through a basic value consensus in the constant dialogue of various social forces and is supported by their openness to each other, their readiness to jointly solve national problems, including the spiritual and moral education of children and youth as the basis for the development of our country.

In the course "Mathematics", in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard, a significant place is given to the development of a sense of belonging to one's Motherland, people, history and pride in them; awareness of the importance of work, through familiarization with the world of professions; awareness of the value of the family as the basis of spiritual and moral development and education of the individual; respect for the environment; healthy and safe lifestyle. Both textual and illustrative material contributes to the achievement of this goal.

I would like to pay special attention to text tasks. The plot content of text tasks, usually associated with the life of the family, class, school, events in the country, city or village, introduces children to different aspects of the surrounding reality; contributes to their spiritual and moral development and education: forms a sense of pride in their homeland, respect for family values, careful attitude to the surrounding world, nature, spiritual values; develops interest in classes in various circles and sports sections; forms an attitude towards a healthy lifestyle. The development of patriotism, a sense of pride in their homeland, the history of Russia, awareness of the role home country such illustrations and textual material (2) contribute to world development: information from the history of our country and its achievements at the present stage of development (for example, in grade 3 it is proposed to determine the age of Moscow and the Russian fleet.

Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications

Federal Communications Agency

Siberian State University of Telecommunications and Informatics

Department of Sociology, Political Science and Psychology

home writing

Topic: "Values ​​in modern Russian society"

Is done by a student

checked

Introduction 3

Values ​​in modern Russia: results of an expert study 4

Dominant values ​​6

Material well-being 6

The value of "I" (individualism) 7

Career (self-realization) 7

Stability 8

Freedom 9

Respect for elders 9

God (faith in God) 10

Patriotism 10

Duty and honor 11

Antivalues ​​12

“Ideal” consolidating values ​​13

Conclusions: key trends in the development of the Russian value doctrine 14

Conclusion 15

References 16

Introduction

Value is a characteristic feature of human life. For many centuries, people have developed the ability to identify objects and phenomena in the world around them that meet their needs and to which they treat in a special way: they value and protect them, they are guided by them in their life. In ordinary word usage, “value” is understood to mean one or another meaning of some object (thing, state, act), its dignity with a “plus” or “minus” sign, something desirable or harmful, in other words, good or bad.

No society can do without values, as for individuals, they have a choice - to share these values ​​or not. Some are committed to the values ​​of collectivism, while others are committed to the values ​​of individualism. For some, the highest value is money, for others - moral impeccability, for others - a political career.

At the present time, the problem of value is of great importance. This is explained by the fact that the process of renewal of all spheres of public life has brought to life many new, both positive and negative phenomena. Developing scientific and technological progress, industrialization and informatization of all spheres of modern society - all this gives rise to the growth of a negative attitude towards history, culture, traditions and leads to the devaluation of values ​​in the modern world.

The lack of spiritual values ​​is felt today in all spheres. Many of our ideals have changed drastically in the course of change. The spiritual balance was disturbed, and a destructive stream of indifference, cynicism, disbelief, envy, and hypocrisy rushed into the resulting void.

The purpose of my work is to study these changes and identify new, modern values ​​of Russian society.

Values ​​in modern Russia: results of an expert study

In the period from July 15 to September 10, 2007, specialists from the Pitirim Sorokin Foundation conducted a study entitled "Values ​​in Modern Russia". It became the first stage of a large-scale project of the same name aimed at helping to develop a value base capable of consolidating various groups of Russian society.

The relevance of the study is due to the obvious demand of society for a new understanding of the value foundation. Various state and social institutions respond to such a request by intensifying the discussion of this topic, but it is not accompanied by a study of the fundamental foundations on which the expected correction of the value doctrine of society should take place. How do Russians understand the concept of “value”? What moral standards are capable of consolidating society? What ideology should these values ​​serve to form? The initiators of the research project will try to find answers to these and other questions.

The purpose of the first - this - stage of work was to study the value trends of Russian society. In particular, the following tasks were proposed for solution:

    To study opinions about the key values ​​that dominate Russian society at the present stage.

    Determine the vector of correction of the axiological preferences of various religious, ethnic and age groups of Russians.

    Record the understanding of the concept of "national ideology" by various audiences, as well as experts' forecasts regarding the development of the national idea of ​​Russia.

    Determine the value priorities of the Russian youth, associated political preferences and electoral plans.

The study was conducted through an expert survey and focus groups with various youth audiences.

According to the opinion of social scientists surveyed, the Russian value system is still chaotic, undergoing transformation, and in its new quality has not yet fully formed.

The reasons for such a long process of registration are " numerous cataclysms that befell Russia in the past century and reflected in the collective consciousness of the population. Experts believe that " people still have not recovered from the feeling of the ground knocked out from under their feet“According to the estimates of social scientists, today in Russia there is no single value system.

However, many value subsystems coexist in the country, spontaneously formed in accordance with the interests and needs of certain social groups.

Some experts called the modern value picture of Russia " a situation of valuable fragments", When " various parts of society use their wreckage».

Dominant values

Among the axiological attitudes characteristic of modern Russian society, the participants in the study - experts and actors of youth focus groups - indicated the following values ​​(ranked according to the principle of descent of the noted significance):

    Material well-being.

    The value of "I" (individualism).

    Career (self-realization).

  1. Stability.

  2. Respect for elders.

    God (faith in God).

    Patriotism.

    Duty and honor.

Material well-being

The priority of the values ​​of material well-being and consumer prosperity (colloquially - mercantilism) for most of the modern Russian society is noted by many experts. First of all, these values ​​are highlighted by the social scientists surveyed, who have the opportunity to follow the dynamics of social demands in the course of their professional activities. They note that the consumer orientation for Russia is unconventional, since it began to take shape only in the period of the 90s, when “idealist” generations left the socially active life.

Analyzing the reasons for the dominance of consumer orientation as a value, the experts pointed out the massive propaganda of the consumer lifestyle and the urbanization of the country as such.

The value of "I" (individualism)

The respondents believe that it is precisely in the concentration of an individual on his own needs and, accordingly, “ in the perception of the surrounding world through an egocentric prism is the essence of individualism as a value.

Such a situation, according to experts, is a consequence of the introduction of the idea of ​​a consumer society, when a hypertrophied orientation towards prosperity focuses a person only on personal interests. Individualism is a response to the empty niche of "common" values, the Soviet system of which was destroyed, and a new one was not created.

The dominance of individualist values, according to a number of respondents, limits the socio-psychological wealth and cultural prospects of the country.

Career (self-realization)

A kind of conversion of the individualistic priorities of modern Russian society is the presentation by experts as an important value of self-realization, which primarily means a successful career. According to a large part of the respondents, it is she who gives Russians, especially young people, “ feeling of worth in the eyes of others", testifies to" social standards" gives the feeling that " you have achieved something in life". Self-realization as the dominant value at the current stage was identified by both experts and young people who participated in focus groups.

Family

The basic nature of the value of the family was noted by all participants in the study without exception.

However, the nature of loyalty to family values ​​differed in a number of expert groups. A significant part of the respondents confidently insist that the family in Russia has been and remains a key element of the social system.

Supporters of this position note that in the new Russia the trend of growing importance of the family is intensifying and they insist on the need for systematic work to introduce family values ​​into the public consciousness.

For another number of experts, the appeal to the family as a value is external - inertial - in nature: this value is indicated as fundamental, but subsequent discussions about it demonstrate a peripheral attitude to the institution of the family in reality.

Separately, it is worth highlighting the position of young people regarding the family: an unexpected result of the study was the fact that, despite the erosion of the institution of the family in a modern globalized society, the vast majority of the young audience states the importance of the family, points to the importance of preserving and protecting the family institution.

Stability

The vast majority of respondents - experts and participants in youth focus groups - noted stability, which means the absence of socio-political and economic cataclysms, as a value that is basic for them.

Young people associate the likelihood of their success in life with stability. Experts of middle and older age explain the desire for stability by fatigue from the “epoch of change”.

Society's desire for stability, experts say, has socio-psychological and pragmatic aspects. Firstly, the correction of the circumstances of existence from extreme to comfortable requires the instinct of psychological self-preservation of society. Secondly, Russians associate the prospects for a personal and national economic breakthrough with stability.

Liberty

Freedom as a basic socially significant value in the course of the study was noted mainly by representatives of the youth audience. At the same time, it is worth pointing out the semantic dichotomy of the value of freedom, which manifested itself in connection with which youth groups spoke out on this issue.

  • 3.1. The East as a sociocultural and civilizational phenomenon
  • 3.2. Pre-Axial Cultures of the Ancient East The level of material civilization and the genesis of social ties
  • Early state in the East
  • Worldview and religious beliefs
  • Art culture
  • 3.3. Post-Axial Cultures of the Ancient East Culture of Ancient India
  • Culture of Ancient China
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 4 Antiquity - the basis of European civilization
  • 4.1. General characteristics and main stages of development
  • 4.2. Antique polis as a unique phenomenon
  • 4.3. Man's worldview in ancient society
  • 4.4. Art culture
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 5 History and Culture of the European Middle Ages
  • 5.1. General characteristics of the European Middle Ages
  • 5.2. Material culture, economy and living conditions in the Middle Ages
  • 5.3. Social and political systems of the Middle Ages
  • 5.4. Medieval pictures of the world, value systems, human ideals
  • 5.5. Artistic culture and art of the Middle Ages
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 6 Medieval Arab East
  • 6.1. General characteristics of the Arab-Muslim civilization
  • 6.2. Economic development
  • 6.3. Socio-political relations
  • 6.4. Features of Islam as a world religion
  • 6.5. Art culture
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 7 Byzantine Civilization
  • 7.1. General characteristics of Byzantine civilization
  • 7.2. Social and political systems of Byzantium
  • 7.3. Byzantine picture of the world. The system of values ​​and the ideal of man
  • 7.4. Artistic culture and art of Byzantium
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 8 Rus' in the Middle Ages
  • 8.1. General characteristics of medieval Rus'
  • 8.2. Economy. Social class structure
  • 8.3. Evolution of the political system
  • 8.4. The value system of medieval Rus'. spiritual culture
  • 8.5. Artistic culture and art
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 9 Revival and Reformation
  • 9.1. The content of the concept and periodization of the era
  • 9.2. Economic, social and political background of the European Renaissance
  • 9.3. Changes in the mindset of citizens
  • 9.4. Renaissance content
  • 9.5. Humanism - the ideology of the Renaissance
  • 9.6. Titanism and its "reverse" side
  • 9.7. Renaissance art
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 10 European history and culture in modern times
  • 10.1. General characteristics of the New Age
  • 10.2. The way of life and material civilization of modern times
  • 10.3. Social and political systems of modern times
  • 10.4. Pictures of the world of modern times
  • 10.5. Artistic styles in the art of modern times
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 11 Russia in the era of modern times
  • 11.1. General information
  • 11.2. Characteristics of the main stages
  • 11.3. Economy. social composition. The evolution of the political system
  • 11.4. The value system of Russian society
  • 11.5. The evolution of spiritual culture Creation of a system of socio-cultural institutions in the era of modern times
  • Correlation between provincial and metropolitan culture
  • Culture of the Don Cossacks
  • The development of socio-political thought and the awakening of civic consciousness
  • The emergence of protective, liberal and socialist traditions
  • Two lines in the history of Russian culture of the XIX century.
  • The role of literature in the spiritual life of Russian society
  • 11.6. Artistic culture of modern times
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 12 Russian history and culture in the late 19th – early 20th centuries.
  • 12.1. General characteristics of the period
  • 12.2. The choice of the path of social development. Programs of political parties and movements Economic policy S.Yu. Witte and P.A. Stolypin
  • Liberal Alternative to Russia's Transformation
  • Social-Democratic Alternative to the Transformation of Russia
  • 12.3. Reassessment of the traditional system of values ​​in the public mind
  • 12.4. Silver Age - the renaissance of Russian culture
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 13 Civilization of the West in the 20th century
  • 13.1. General characteristics of the period
  • 13.2. The evolution of the value system in Western culture of the XX century.
  • 13.3. The main trends in the development of Western art
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 14 Soviet society and culture
  • 14.1. Problems of the history of Soviet society and culture
  • 14.2. The formation of the Soviet system (1917-1930s) General characteristics of the period
  • Ideology. Politic system
  • Economy
  • social structure. public consciousness
  • culture
  • 14.3. Soviet society during the years of war and peace. Crisis and collapse of the Soviet system (40-80s) General characteristics
  • Ideology. Politic system
  • Economic development of Soviet society
  • Social relations. public consciousness. System of values
  • Cultural life
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Chapter 15 Russia in the 90s
  • 15.1. Political and socio-economic development of modern Russia
  • 15.2. Public consciousness in the 90s: the main development trends
  • 15.3. Cultural development
  • Control questions
  • Bibliography
  • Culturology
  • Course implementation procedure
  • Annex 2 program of the course "History and cultural studies"
  • Topic I. Main schools, trends and theories in history and cultural studies
  • Theme II. Primitive society: the birth of man and culture
  • Topic III. History and culture of ancient civilizations
  • Topic IV. History and culture of medieval civilizations (V-XV centuries)
  • Theme V. Rus' in the Middle Ages
  • Theme VI. Renaissance and Reformation
  • Theme VII. History and culture of modern times (XVII-XIX centuries)
  • Theme VIII. The beginning of a new period in Russian history and culture
  • Topic IX. History and culture of the XX century
  • Topic X. Russia in the 20th century
  • Demo materials
  • Bibliography for introduction
  • To topic I
  • To topic II
  • To Topic III
  • To the topic IV
  • To topic V
  • To Topic VI
  • To theme VII
  • To Theme VIII
  • To themes IX and x
  • Subject index
  • name index
  • Content
  • History and cultural studies
  • 105318, Moscow, Izmailovskoe sh., 4
  • 432601, Ulyanovsk, st. Goncharova, 14
  • 11.4. The value system of Russian society

    Radical changes in all spheres of life in the era of the New Age also affected the value system of Russian society. The most important factor that influenced these changes was the formation of technogenic civilization, bourgeois social relations, and rationalistic thinking.

    Despite the split that occurred in Russian society under Peter I between the upper and lower classes, it retained traditional value ideas and a way of life. One of the main such values ​​in the life of the upper and lower classes is the family and family traditions. The authority of the family in Russian society was unusually high. A man who did not want to start a family in adulthood aroused suspicion. Only two reasons could justify such a decision - illness and the desire to enter a monastery. Russian proverbs and sayings speak eloquently about the importance of the family in a person’s life: “Not married is not a person”, “In the family and porridge is thicker”, “A family in a heap is not afraid of a cloud”, etc. The family was the custodian and transmitter of life experience, morality from generation to generation, the upbringing and education of children took place here. So, in the noble estate, portraits of grandfathers and great-grandfathers, stories and legends about them, their things - grandfather's favorite chair, mother's favorite cup, etc. were kept. In Russian novels, this feature of estate life appears as its integral feature.

    In peasant life, also permeated with the poetry of traditions, the very concept of a house had, first of all, the meaning of deep ties, and not just living space: a father's house, a home. Hence the respect for everything that the house makes up. The tradition even provided for different types of behavior in different parts of the house (what is possible at the stove, what is not in the red corner, etc.), the preservation of the memory of the elders is also a peasant tradition. Icons, things and books passed from the old people to the younger generation. Such a peasant-noble perception of life could not do without some idealization - after all, memory preserved the best everywhere. Ritual traditions associated with church and calendar holidays were repeated almost unchanged in various social strata of Russian society. Not only to the Larins could be attributed the words:

    They kept in a peaceful life

    Habits of peaceful antiquity;

    They have oily Shrovetide

    There were Russian pancakes.

    The Russian family remained patriarchal, for a long time guided by the "Domostroy" - an old set of everyday rules and instructions.

    Thus, the upper and lower classes, cut off from each other in their historical existence, nevertheless had the same moral values.

    Meanwhile, the most important socio-economic transformations taking place in Russia, characterized by the establishment of competition in the economy, liberalism in political life, the establishment of the ideas of free thought and enlightenment, contributed to the spread of new European socio-cultural values, which, in fact, did not take root among the masses - only the elite could master them.

    The working masses (the so-called "soil") adhered to the traditions of pre-Petrine antiquity. They guarded the original ideological dogmas associated with Orthodoxy and autocracy, deeply rooted traditions, political and social institutions. Such values ​​could not contribute to the modernization or even intensive sociodynamics of the country. Collectivism remained the defining feature of social consciousness in the "soil" layers. He was the main moral value in the peasant, urban township and Cossack communities. Collectivism helped jointly endure the trials of difficult times, was the main factor in social protection. Thus, the life of the Cossacks was based on community organization and the principles of military democracy: collective decision-making in the Cossack circle, election of atamans, collective forms of ownership*. The harsh and cruel conditions of the existence of the Cossacks contributed to the creation of a certain system values.

    * There were 12 Cossack regions in the Russian Empire. The Russian phenomenon of the Cossacks is characterized by ambiguity, the presence of controversial issues. The Cossacks lived in the newly developed territories of Russia, on its outskirts. In the pre-Petrine era, they independently fought against the powerful Ottoman Empire, the Crimean Khanate and the Kingdom of Poland, protecting the Russian borders from devastating raids. Subsequently, the Cossacks participated in the wars of the Russian Empire.

    The pre-revolutionary historian E. Savelyev, who described the history of the Don Cossacks, drew attention to the fact that “the Cossacks were a straightforward and chivalrous people, they did not like unnecessary words, and they decided matters in the Circle quickly and fairly.” Cunning and intelligence, steadfastness and the ability to endure severe hardships, merciless revenge on the enemy, cheerfulness of character distinguished the Cossacks. They firmly stood for each other - "all for one and one for all", for their Cossack brotherhood; were incorruptible; betrayal, cowardice, theft were not forgiven. In campaigns, border towns and cordons, the Cossacks led a single life and strictly observed chastity. A textbook example is Stepan Razin, who ordered a Cossack and a woman to be thrown into the Volga for violating chastity, and when he himself was reminded of the same, he threw a captive Persian princess into the water. It was high moral qualities that contributed to the constantly high combat readiness of the Cossack army.

    From the judgments made about the system of values ​​in the "soil" way of Russian society, it can be seen how the people's worldview was little affected by the grandiose changes that took place in the state in the New Era. To a much greater extent, the changes affected the literate and active part of the population of Russia, which V. Klyuchevsky called "civilization". New classes of society were formed here, entrepreneurship developed and market relations developed, professional intelligentsia appeared. The intelligentsia was represented by the clergy and nobility, commoners and serfs (actors, musicians, architects, etc.). In the ranks of the intelligentsia, rationalism, an optimistic worldview, and belief in the possibility of improving the world were affirmed as a style of thinking. The worldview was freed from the spiritual power of the church.

    Peter I abolished the patriarchate and put a synod at the head of the church, in fact a board of officials, thereby subordinating the church to the state. Further weakening of the church occurred in the 60s of the 18th century, when Catherine II, who strengthened the foundations of the secular absolutist state, confiscated most of the land holdings belonging to the church and monasteries. Of the 954 monasteries that existed at that time, only 385 survived the secularization.

    Destruction of the closed Orthodox world largely due to Russian enlightenment. F. Prokopovich, V. Tatishchev, A. Kantemir, M. Lomonosov, D. Anichkov, S. Desnitsky, A. Radishchev developed ideas about the independence of nature and man from divine predestination, the need to separate the spheres of influence of religion and science, etc. . In the 19th century the ideas of free thought, sharp criticism of religion were put forward by many Decembrists, as well as revolutionary democrats V. Belinsky, A. Herzen, N. Chernyshevsky, N. Dobrolyubov. They tried to create a general atheistic concept, highlighting the origin of religion, its social functions, especially Orthodoxy.

    Changes in the personal and social life of the estates played an important role in the value system of Russian society. According to D.S. Likhachev, under Peter I, “the awareness of the transition forced us to change the system of signs”: put on a European dress, new uniforms, “scrape off” beards, reform all state terminology in a European way, recognize European.

    One of the features of the personality of a nobleman was the ability to communicate, which suggested for him wide friendly ties. At the same time, assemblies and secular clubs (English, etc.) were of considerable importance, which introduced a woman into the public life of Russia. After the "terem", closed world, in which even a high-ranking woman lived in the Middle Ages, a new type of woman appeared - educated, following European standards of life. 18th and 19th centuries give many such examples: E. Dashkova - the first president of the first Russian Academy of Sciences, E. Rostopchina - a writer, M. Volkonskaya and other wives of the Decembrists.

    The life of the nobility necessarily included dinners and balls, reading books and playing music, enjoying works of art. A daily walk in the park entered the life of the nobility not only in the village, but also in the city*. At the end of the XVIII century. such a socio-cultural phenomenon as a noble estate arose, with which an extensive layer of national culture is associated, which goes beyond its noble part.

    * Quoted. By: Polikarpov V.S. History of morals in Russia. Rostov-on-D.: Phoenix, 1995. S. 196.

    The inconsistency of the era was manifested in the "sublime" achievements of the noble "estate culture" and the presence of serf customs. Humanity and nobility coexisted with the landlord's "hardness of heart". However, in general, for the Russian nobles of the XVIII-XIX centuries. characteristic was the rejection of landlord arbitrariness, cruelty, class arrogance, arrogance. In this milieu a brilliant and enlightened stratum of the intelligentsia arose. Those who entered it led closed image life, observing a certain moral distance in relation to the provincial and district administrations, the policy of oppression of the common people.

    This generation of intelligentsia had a huge impact on the development of national culture. It was then that education, the talent of scientists and literary success became the main criteria for the honor and dignity of a nobleman. “Educated circles represented among us then among the Russian people oases in which the best mental and cultural forces were concentrated - artificial centers, with their own special atmosphere, in which elegant, deeply enlightened and moral personalities were developed,” wrote K.D. Kavelin*.

    * Quoted. By: Russian society 30s of the XIX century. People and ideas. Memoirs of contemporaries. M., 1989. S. 145.

    Feelings of citizenship, love for the Fatherland, the need to improve a person (improve the breed) were preached here. It was believed that the love of knowledge, science, theater would contribute to the improvement of morals. Literature played the most important role in shaping the value system of the Russian intelligentsia. She played the role of models and samples, forms of life behavior of the individual. A.S. Pushkin, N.I. Turgenev, N.V. Gogol, F.M. Dostoevsky, L.N. Tolstoy, A.P. Chekhov and many other writers and poets created images - mirrors, allowing you to compare your own actions and actions with them. Interestingly, the Russian bureaucracy, being an important factor public life, left almost no trace in the spiritual life of Russia: it did not create its own culture, or its own ethics, or even its own ideology. The value system of this part of Russian society was accurately expressed by Kapnist in the comedy Yabeda:

    Take it, there is no science here;

    Take what you can take.

    What are our hands tied to?

    How not to take?

    The advanced intelligentsia was united by the rejection of Russian reality, its despotic mores, arbitrariness, lawlessness. In the 19th century a radical intelligentsia appeared, proclaiming the need to change the social system in Russia. This part of the intelligentsia was distinguished by the presence of ideas of social restructuring, a heightened sense of responsibility for the fate of the people. In identifying a special cultural-historical and psychological type of a noble revolutionary, an important role was played by the sharpness and directness of their judgments, "indecent" from the point of view of secular norms; energy, enterprise, firmness aimed at practical changes; sincerity and honesty; the cult of fiery friendship and brotherhood; responsibility before history; poetry of freedom. Dual behavior, insincerity in relations with political opponents, violence as a way of life for a revolutionary appeared later (in the 60s-80s of the 19th century). So, for the populist revolutionaries, life in a double world has become the norm.

    Members of the organization "Narodnaya Volya" A. Zhelyabov, S. Perovskaya, N. Kibalchich and others became supporters of terrorist activities. To an even greater extent, violence was established among the Marxist intellectuals, who associated the progress of mankind, the realization of the age-old aspirations of the people for equality and justice, with the forcible introduction of socialism.

    Among the new Russian bourgeoisie, the value orientations of the bourgeois way of life were affirmed. Here appeared the desire for European education, upbringing, patronage and charity, which did not at all correspond to the mores of the merchant class, vividly described by A. Ostrovsky in his plays. The dynasties of the Demidovs, Shchukins, Tretyakovs, Morozovs, Soldatenkovs had a huge impact on the cultural life of Russia. Large manufacturers and merchants showed great interest in urban life and helped her with significant donations. Examples of such an educated merchant class in Rostov-on-Don were the Gairobetovs, Sadomtsevs, Yashchenkos, Litvinovs, Krechetovs, and others. The theater developed here thanks to the merchants Gairobetov and Asmolov. The construction of one of the most beautiful buildings in the city, the Alexander Nevsky Church, became the life work of the merchant Ilyin. Merchant charity in the field of health care and social charity was of no less importance.

    Thus, under the influence of Western European ideas, a new worldview, lifestyle, and mores were formed that changed the system of values ​​of the Russian elite. However, as a result of all the transformations in the era of the New Age, Russia did not become Europe, it, according to the figurative expression of G.V. Plekhanov, "had a European head and an Asian body." The combination of European and traditional values ​​led to the emergence of the problem of "intelligentsia and the people" - an eternal Russian problem.

    
    Top